Skip to main content
Log in

Oviposition preference of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostelld) unaffected by the presence of conspecific eggs orBacillus thuringiensis

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neither toxins fromBacillus thuringiensis Berliner nor conspecific eggs deterred oviposition by the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in laboratory choice tests. The finding that toxins did not deter oviposition by moths from a susceptible line shows that oviposition preference and larval survival were not associated in this line. Selection for larval resistance to toxins did not significantly alter oviposition preference, which rules out a strong genetic correlation between larval performance and oviposition preference. Failure of conspecific eggs to deter oviposition may not represent lack of association of preference and performance because other evidence suggests that larval performance may not be greatly affected by larval density. These results suggest that the ability of refuges to slow evolution of physiological resistance toB. thuringiensis toxins will not be magnified by an oviposition preference for untreated foliage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boulter, D., Gatehouse, J.A., Gatehouse, A.M.R., andHilder, V.A. 1990. Genetic engineering of plants for insect resistance.Endeavour 14:185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, M.A., andTabashnik, B.E. 1992. Evolution of resistance to plant defensive chemicals in insects, pp. 179–215,in B.D. Roitberg and M. Isman (eds.). Evolutionary Perspectives in Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, F.S. 1977. Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous food plants. II. The distribution of eggs on potential food plants.Evolution 31:568–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2d ed. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover, J.W. 1985. The responses of some Lepidoptera to labiate herb and white clover extracts.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39:177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferre, J., Real, M.D., Van Rie, J., Jansens, S., andPeferoen, M. 1991. Resistance to theBacillus thuringiensis bioinsecticide in a field populationPlutella xylostella is due to a change in a midgut membrane receptor.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 88:5119–5123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, C.S., andFraley, R.T., 1989. Genetically engineering plants for crop improvement.Science 244:1293–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, F. 1991. Arthropod behavior and the efficacy of plant protectants.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36:305–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.H. 1989. Power analysis and practical strategies for environmental monitoring.Environ. Res. 50:195–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groeters, F.R.Tabashnik, B.E.,Finson, N., andJohnson, M.W. 1992. Fitness trade-offs in the evolution of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis by the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Evolution submitted.

  • Gupta, P.D., andThorsteinson, J.A. 1960. Food plant relationships of the diamondback moth [Plutella maculipennis (Curt.)]. II Sensory regulation of oviposition of the adult female.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 3:305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, D.G. 1986. Population dynamics of the diamondback moth in southern Ontario, pp. 3–15,in N.S. Talekar (ed.). Diamondback Moth Management: Proceedings of the First International Workshop. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofte, H., andWhitely, H.R. 1989. Insecticidal crystal proteins ofBacillus thuringiensis.Microbiol. Rev. 53:242–255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J. 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:243–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J., andGrimaldi, D. 1983. Genetic variation for host preference within and among populations ofDrosophila tripunctata.Evolution 37:1023–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J., andHolt, R.D. 1991. Genetic variation for habitat preference: Evidence and explanations.Am. Nat. I37:s67-s90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klunstra, J.W. 1986. The effect of oviposition deterring pheromone on egg laying inPieris brassicae.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41:139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, D.E., Schenk, T.C., andChiang, H.C. 1986. European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) oviposition preference and survival on sunflower and com.Environ. Entomol. 15:631–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D.W., Pivnick, K.A., andUnderhill, E.W. 1989. Identification of chemical oviposition stimulants for the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella, present in three species of Brassicaceae.Entomol. Exp. App. 53:277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberry, J.T., andWiens, J.A. 1985. Statistical power analysis and community-wide patterns.Am. Nat. 125:164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., andSchoonhoven, L.M. 1977. Assessment of egg load byPieris brassicae, (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).Nature, 266:352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J.M., Tabashnik, B.E., andJohnson, M.W. 1991. Behavioral and physiological responses of susceptible and resistant diamondback moth larvae toBacillus thuringiensis.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 61:179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slansky, F., Jr., andRodriguez, J.G. (eds.) 1987. Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B.E. 1985. Deterrence of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) oviposition by plant compounds.Environ. Entomol. 14:575–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B.E., andSlansky, F., Jr. 1987. Nutritional ecology of forb foliage-chewing insects, pp. 71–104,in F. Slansky, Jr. and J.G. Rodriguez (eds.). Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B.E., Gushing, N.L., Finson, N., andJohnson, M.W. 1990. Field development of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 83:1671–1676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B.E., Finson, N., andJohnson, M.W. 1991. Managing resistance toBacillus thuringiensis: Lessons from the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 84:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talekar, N.S. (ed.) 1986. Diamondback Moth Management: Proceedings of the First International Workshop. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.N. 1988. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.N., andPellmyr, O. 1991. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36:65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. 1990. Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: The experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35:421–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C. 1975. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range inPapilio machaon L.Oecologia 18:185–197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groeters, F.R., Tabashnik, B.E., Finson, N. et al. Oviposition preference of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostelld) unaffected by the presence of conspecific eggs orBacillus thuringiensis . J Chem Ecol 18, 2353–2362 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984954

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984954

Key Words

Navigation