Abstract
This study examined learning in the domain of sentence parsing and syntax treediagram construction. The aim of the study was to assess whether subjects could learn ‘vicariously’ from recordings of interactions between a previous student and a tutor.
Four intervention conditions and a control condition were compared. Subjects in a ‘dialogue’ group (DL) read printed tutorial notes and subsequently ‘vicariously” viewed dynamic (animated) recordings of tree diagrams being constructed by a previous student in the presence of a tutor.
The discourse (DI) condition was similar except that subjects viewed recordings of tree diagrams being constructed by a tutor who concurrently verbalised instructional discourse.
In a third condition (DO), subjects viewed tree-diagram construction animation clips which were not annotated with either dialogue or discourse. In a linear text (LT) condition, subjects were given only printed tutorial notes. A control (CO) condition involved pre and post testing without any intervention.
Results indicated that the dialogue condition was as effective as the discourse condition. This provides support for contention that ‘re-usable’ dialogue is a useful resource for the vicarious learner. Another finding was that un-annotated animated diagrams were surprisingly effective. Several reasons for their effectiveness are suggested from the literature on instructional animations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1977).Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Beishuizen, J., Booij, W. & de Visser, M. (1997). Combining Andersen and Bandura in a multimedia program on lecturing.Proceedings of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Athens, August, 1997.
Laurillard, D. (1993).Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: Routledge Press.
Lee, J., McKendree, J., Cox, R., Stenning, K. & Dineen, F. (1998). Vicarious learning: More than common ground. Workshop on ‘The Use of Herbert H. dark's Models of Language Use for the Design of Cooperative Systems’ held at the Third International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems. Cannes, France, May.
Lee, J., McKendree, J., Dineen, F. & Cox, R. (1998). Vicarious learning: dialogue and multimodality. In H. Bunt, R.-J. Beun, T. Borghuis, L. Kievit & M. Verlinden, eds,Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication (CMC'98), pp. 177–180. Den Haag: CIP Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek.
Les, J., Thomason, N. & Cumming, G. (1997). Play it again SAM: StatPlay and a recording and playback facility to support learning. In B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi, eds,Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems (Proceedings of the 8th World Conference of the Artificial Intelligence in Education Society), pp. 466–473. Amsterdam: IOS.
Mayes, T. & Neilson, I. (1996). Learning from other people's dialogues: Questions about computer-based answers. In B. Collins & G. Davies, eds,Innovating Learning with Innovative Technology. North Holland: Amsterdam.
McKendree, J. & Mayes, J.T. (1997). The Vicarious Learner: Investigating the benefits of observing peer dialogues.Proceedings of Computer-Assisted Learning Conference (CAL'97), pp. 161–164. Exeter, U.K.
Ohlsson, S. (1995). Learning to do and learning to undertand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modelling. In P. Reimann & H. Spada, eds,Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science, pp. 37–62. Oxford: Elsevier-Science.
Park, O. & Hopkins, R. (1993). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: A review.Instructional Science 21: 427–449.
Schnotz, W., Boeckheler, J. & Grzondziel, H. (1997). Individual and co-operative acquisition of knowledge with static and animated pictures in computer-based learning environments.Proceedings of the European Association/or Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), pp. 182–183. Gutenberg University Publications.
Schober, M.F. & Clark, H.H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and observers.Cognitive Psychology 21: 211–232.
Schon, D.E. (1987).Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stasko, J., Badre, A. & Lewis, C. (1993). Do algorithm animations assist learning? An empirical study and analysis.Proceedings of the INTERCHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 61–66. The Netherlands: Amsterdam.
Stenning, K., Lee, J., Cox, R., McKendree, J. & Mayes T. (1997) The Vicarious Learner: Understanding the learning benefits of observing peer dialogues.Proceedings of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Athens, August, 1997.
Voss, J.F. (1990) Reasoning by argumentation. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, N. Bennett, & H.F. Friedrich, eds,Learning and Instruction: European Research in an International Context, Vol. 2.1, pp. 305–319. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, R., Mckendree, J., Tobin, R. et al. Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse. Instr Sci 27, 431–458 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891973
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891973