Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic evaluations of economic merit of water resource projects

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of uncertainties in assessing benefits and costs detracts from deterministic economic evaluation. This paper examines three probabilistic economic evaluation procedures: stochastic dominance, expected gain-confidence limit, and Hurwicz criterion. Their relative performances are evaluated through an example. Furthermore, the paper investigates the effects of (1) distributional assumptions of benefit and cost items, (2) uncertainty in project life, and (3) distribution of net present value on the project selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, J. W., Zinn, C. D., and Eldred, B. S.: 1978, A methodology for obtaining the probability density function of the present worth of probabilistic cash flow profiles,AIIE Trans. 10(3), 226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J.: 1963, An expected gain-confidence limit criterion for portfolio selection,Management Sci. 10, 174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bey, R. P.: 1981, The inpact of stochastic project lives on capital budgeting decisions, in R. L. Crum and F. G. J. Derkinderen. (eds.),Capital Budgeting Under Conditions of Uncertainty, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. R. and Askin, R. G.: 1986, Partial means in the economic risk analysis of projects,The Engineering Economists 31(3), 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, D. W.: 1984,Applied Decision Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, J. R. and White, J. A.: 1980.Capital Investment Decision Analysis for Management and Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. C. W. and Manes, R. P., 1986: A note on Bias in capital budgeting introduced by stochastic life,The Engineering Economist 31(2), 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Ramly, N. A., Peterson, R. E., and Seo, K. K.: 1975, Economic comparison of projects incorporating decision theory and the expected gain-confidence limit criterion,The Engineering Economists 20(1), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, N. S.: 1985,Water Resources Planning, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCava, G. J.: 1976, Improving the mean-variance criterion using stochastic dominance,Decision Sci. 7, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: 1959,Portfolio Selection, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. B. and Carey, K.: 1974, Stochastic dominance as a risk analysis criterion,Decision Sci. 5, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha, H. A.: 1976,Operations Research: An Introduction, 2nd edn., MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, S. and Young, D. B.: 1987, Moments of the present worth of general probabilistic cash flows under random timing,The Engineering Economist 32(4), 303–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, Y. K., Wang, P. Y., and Yang, J. C.: 1993, Water resources projects evaluation and ranking under economic uncertainty,J. Water Resour. Mgmt. 7, 311–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne, J. C.: 1972, Capital budgeting under conditions of uncertainty as to project life,The Engineering Economist,17(3), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. B. and Contreras, L. E.: 1975, Expected present worths of cash flows under uncertain timing,The Engineering Economist,20(4), 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tung, YK., Yang, JC. Probabilistic evaluations of economic merit of water resource projects. Water Resour Manage 8, 203–223 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877087

Key words

Navigation