Skip to main content
Log in

Phase II evaluation of the AMAP, 773U82 mesylate, in pancreatic cancer

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause in cancer related death among adults in the United States. Thirtythousand new cases of pancreatic cancer are diagnosed each year, most are metastatic at diagnosis and no effective systemic therapy is available. 773U82 mesylate is one of a series of compounds (arylmethylaminopropanediols-AMAPS) which was synthesized at the Wellcome Research Laboratories. AMAPS bind to DNA, show evidence of topoisomerase 2 inhibition and are active in a variety of murine and human preclinical screens. Based on these data a phase II trial of 773U82 mesylate administered at 800 mg/ m2 daily × 3 at a 4 h infusion repeated every three weeks was carried out. Patients eligible for these trials had histologic proof of adenocarcinoma, good performance status, and normal organ function. This was a multi-institutional trial. Nineteen patients were entered; 15 patients were fully eligible and 4 were ineligible, but were evaluated. Thirteen patients were fully evaluable for response and no response was seen. Median time to progressive disease among eligible patients was 56 days. Toxicity of 773U82 mesylate was myelosuppression which was not prohibitive. 773U82 mesylate is not active in pancreatic cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T: Cancer Statistics, 1991 CA: A Journal of Clinicians 41:19–51, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brennen MF, Kinsella T, Friedman M: Cancer of the pancreas. In: Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, 3rd edition, DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) 1989, pp 800–835

  3. Forrest JR, Longmire WP Jr: Carcinoma of the pancreas and periampullary region: a study of 279 patients. Ann Surg 189:129–134, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks JR: Operative approach to pancreatic cancer. Semin Oncol 6:357–365, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  5. Monge JJ, Judd ES, Gage RP: Radical pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 22 year experience with the complications, mortality rate and survival rate. Ann Surg 160: 711–716, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tepper J, Nardi G, Sut H: Carcinoma of the pancreas. Review of the MGH experience: indications for radiation therapy. Cancer 37:1519–1524, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wiggans G, Wooley PV, MacDonald J, Smythe T, Ueno W, Schein PS: Phase II trial of streptozotocin, mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil (SMF) in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer 41:387–391, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waddell WR: Chemotherapy for carcinoma of the pancreas. Surgery 74:420, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kovach JS, Moertel CG, Schutt AJ, Hahn RG, Reitemeier RJ: A controlled trial of combined 1,3 Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-Nitrosourea and 5-fluorouracil therapy for advanced gastric and pancreatic cancer. Cancer 33:563–567, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cullinan S, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, Schutt AJ, Krook JE, Foley JF, Norris BD, Kardinal CG, Tschetter LK, Barlow JF: A phase III trial of the therapy of advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Evaluations of the mallinson regimen and combined 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Cancer 65:2207–2212, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moertel CG, Childs DS, Reitmeier RJ, Colby MY, Jr, Holbrook MA: Combined 5-fluorouracil and supervoltage radiation therapy of locally unresectable gastrointestinal cancer. Lancet 2:865–869, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bair K, Andrews C, Tuttle R, Knick VC, Cory M, McKee DD: Synthesis and antitumor activity of a novel series of DNA intercalators. Northeast Regional Meeting 15, Nerm 15, Hosted by the Mid-Huston Section of the American Chemical Society, 1985

  13. Bair KW, Andrews CW, Tuttle RL, Knick VC, McKee DD, Cory M: Biophysical studies and murine antitumor activity of arylmethylaminopropanediols (AMAPS), a new class of DNA binding drugs. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 27:424, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carter CA, Bair KW: Effects of arylmethylaminopropanediols (AMAPS) and established agents on macromolecular synthesis in MCF-7 cells. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 31:396, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bellamy W, Dorr R, Bair KW: Cytotoxicity and mechanisms of action of 3 arylmethylaminopropanediols (AMAPS). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 30:562, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carbone PP, Lucas SV, Alberti DB, Arzoomanian RZ, Tombes MB, Trump DL, Remick SR, Wargin WA, Tuttle RL, Frontiera M, Kohler P, Sparks C, Nieting L, Bailey H, Wilding G: Phase I evaluation of BWA773UHCL(BWA773) in two hour infusion repeated daily × 3. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 30:247, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  17. Havlin K, Kuhn J, Craig J: Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of BWA773U, an arylmethylaminopropanediol. Proc Am Soc Clinic Oncol 79:306, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gehan EA: The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. J Chron Dis 13:346–353, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blyth CR, Still HA: Binomial confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 78:108–116, 1983

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trump, D.L., Hathorn, J.A., Grochow, L.B. et al. Phase II evaluation of the AMAP, 773U82 mesylate, in pancreatic cancer. Invest New Drugs 12, 273–276 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873040

Key words

Navigation