Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of organ-specific immunoliposomes for delivery of 3′,5′-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine in a mouse lung-metastasis model

  • Original Article
  • Immunoliposome, Lipophilic Prodrug, Lung Targeting
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A previous study has shown that lipophilic prodrugs can be delivered efficiently to normal lung endothelium by incorporation into liposomes covalently conjugated to monoclonal antibody (mAb) 34A against the lung endothelial anticoagulant protein thrombomodulin. In the present study, the potential use of these lung-targeted immunoliposomes (34A-liposomes) for delivery of a lipophilic prodrug, 3′,5′-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (dpFUdR), to the tumor-bearing lung was examined using BALB/c mice bearing experimental lung metastasis induced by i.v. injection of EMT-6 mouse mammary tumor cells. Immunohistochemical examination of the tumor-bearing lung showed specificity of mAb 34A to lung endothelium. Tumor cells appeared to localize just outside of the normal blood vessels and were within a small diffusion distance from the mAb 34A-binding sites.111In-labeled 34A-liposomes containing monosialoganglioside (GM1) were prepared that included [3H]-dpFUdR at 3.0 mol% in the lipid mixture. In vitro cell binding studies further demonstrated that 34A-liposomes bound specifically to normal mouse lung cells that expressed thrombomodulin but not to EMT-6 cells. Biodistribution study showed efficient and immunospecific accumulation of [3H]-dpFUdR incorporated into 34A-liposomes in the lung at a level parallel with that of111In-labeled 34A-liposomes, indicating that the drug is delivered to the target organ in intact liposomes. Liposomal dpFUdR appeared to be metabolized in the lung to the parent drug FUdR at a rate slower than in the liver and spleen. Furthermore, treatment of lung-metastasis-bearing mice with dpFUdR incorporated into 34A-liposomes on days 1 and 3 after tumor cell injection resulted in a significant increase in the median survival time of treated mice as compared with control mice (%T/C value, 165%). dpFUdR either dispersed in emulsion or incorporated into antibody-free liposomes was ineffective in prolonging the survival of mice. These results indicate the potential effectiveness of organ-specific immunoliposomes containing a lipophilic prodrug for the targeted therapy of metastatic tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Chol :

Cholesterol

dpFUdR :

3′,5′-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine

DTPA-SA :

diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid distearylamide complex

G M 1 :

monosialoganglioside

IC 50 :

50% inhibitory concentration

mAb :

monoclonal antibody

MST :

mean survival time

NGPE :

N-glutaryl phosphatidylethanolamine

NMLC :

normal mouse lung cells

OG :

octyl-β-d-glucopyranoside

PBS :

phosphate-buffered saline

PC :

egg phosphatidylcholine

%T/C :

(median survival time of treated mice divided by the median survival time of control mice) x100

RES :

reticuloendothelial system

References

  1. Brodsky FM (1988) Monoclonal antibodies as magic bullets. Pharm Res 5: 1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rowlinson-Busza G, Epenetos AA (1992) Targeted delivery of biologic and other antineoplastic agents. Curr Opin Oncol 4: 1142

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kosmas C, Linardou H, Epenetos AA (1993) Review: advances in monoclonal antibody tumour targeting. J Drug Targeting 1: 81

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jain RK (1990) Vascular and interstitial barriers to delivery of therapeutic agents in tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev 9: 253

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rorvik MC, Allison DP, Hotchkiss JA, Witschi HP, Kennel SJ (1988) Antibodies to mouse lung capillary endothelium. J Histochem Cytochem 36: 741

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ford VA, Stringer C, Kennel SJ (1992) Thrombomodulin is preferentially expressed in BALB/c lung microvessels. J Biol Chem 267: 5446

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kennel SJ, Lankford T, Hughes B, Hotchkiss JA (1988) Quantitation of a murine lung endothelial cell protein, P112, with a double monoclonal antibody assay. Lab Invest 59: 692

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennel SJ, Lee R, Bultman S, Kabalka G (1990) Rat monoclonal antibody distribution in mice: an epitope inside the lung vascular space mediated very efficient localization. Nucl Med Biol 17: 193

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wright S, Huang L (1989) Antibody-directed liposomes as drug-delivery vehicles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 3: 343

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ostro MJ (ed) (1987) Liposomes: from biophysics to therapeutics. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes BJ, Kennel S, Lee R, Huang L (1989) Monoclonal antibody targeting of liposomes to mouse lung in vivo. Cancer Res 49: 6214

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holmberg E, Maruyama K, Litzinger DC, Wright S, Davis M, Kabalka GW, Kennel SJ, Huang L (1989) Highly efficient immunoliposomes prepared with a method which is compatible with various lipid compositions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 165: 1272

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maruyama K, Holmberg E, Kennel SJ, Klibanov A, Torchilin VP, Huang L (1990) Characterization of in vivo immunoliposome targeting to pulmonary endothelium. J Pharm Sci 79: 978

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holmberg E, Maruyama K, Kennel S, Klibanov A, Torchilin V, Ryan U, Huang L (1990) Target-specific binding of immunoliposomes in vivo. J Liposome Res 1: 393

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mori A, Liu D, Huang L (1992) Novel immunoliposome targeting system avoiding reticuloendothelial cell. In: Junginger HE (ed) Drug targeting and delivery: concepts in dosage form design. Ellis Horwood, New York, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maruyama K, Kennel SJ, Huang L (1990) Lipid composition is important for highly efficient target binding and retention of immunoliposomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 5744

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mori A, Klibanov AL, Torchilin VP, Huang L (1991) Influence of the steric barrier activity of amphipathic poly(ethyleneglycol) and ganglioside GM1 on the circulation time of liposomes and on the target binding of immunoliposomes in vivo. FEBS Lett 284: 263

    Google Scholar 

  18. Litzinger DC, Huang L (1992) Biodistribution and immunotarget-ability of ganglioside-stabilized dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine liposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1104: 179

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mori A, Kennel SJ, Huang L (1993) Immunotargeting of liposomes containing lipophilic antitumor prodrugs. Pharm Res 10: 507

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kabalka G, Buonocore E, Hubner K, Moss T, Norley N, Huang L (1987) Gadolinium-labeled liposomes: targeted MR contrast agents for the liver and spleen. Radiology 163: 255

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwendener RA, Supersaxo A, Rubas W, Weder HG, Hartmann HR, Schott H, Ziegler A, Hengartner H (1985) 5′-O-Palmitoyl- and 3′,5′-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine-novel lipophilic anlogues of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine: synthesis, incorporation into liposomes and preliminary biological results. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 126: 660

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klibanov AL, Maruyama K, Torchilin VP, Huang L (1990) Amphipathic polyethyleneglycols effectively prolong the circulation time of liposomes. FEBS Lett 268: 235

    Google Scholar 

  23. Borssum Waalkes M van, Galen M van, Morselt H, Sternberg B, Scherphof GL (1993) In vitro stability and cytostatic activity of liposomal formulations of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine and its diacylated derivatives. Biochim Biophys Acta 1148: 161

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kennel SJ, Foote LJ, Lankford PK (1981) Analysis of surface proteins of mouse lung carcinomas using monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res 41: 3465

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kennel SJ, Foote LJ, Flynn KM (1986) Tumor antigen on benign adenomas and on murine lung carcinomas quantitated by a two-site monoclonal antibody assay. Cancer Res 46: 707

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rockwell SC, Kallman RF, Fajardo LF (1972) Characteristics of a serially transplanted mouse mammary tumor and its tissue-culture-adapted derivative. J. Natl Cancer Inst 49: 735

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rockwell S (1977) In vivo-in vitro tumor systems: new models for studying the response of tumor to therapy. Lab Animal Sci 27: 831

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mori A, Huang L (1992) Immunoliposome targeting in a mouse model: optimization and therapeutic application. In: Gregoriadis G (ed) Liposome technology, 2nd edn, vol. III. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 153

    Google Scholar 

  29. Osterman LA (ed) (1984) The use of radioisotopes. In: Methods of protein and nucleic acid research. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, p 67

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu MS, Robbins JC, Bugianesi RL, Ponpipom MM, Shen TY (1981) Modified in vivo behavior of liposomes containing synthetic glycolipids. Biochim Biophys Acta 674: 19

    Google Scholar 

  31. Derksen JTP, Morselt HWM, Kalicharan D, Hulstaert CE, Scherphof GL (1987) Interaction of immunoglobulin-coated liposomes with rat liver macrophages in vitro. Exp Cell Res 168: 105

    Google Scholar 

  32. Aragnol D, Leserman L (1986) Immune clearance of liposomes inhibited by an anti-Fc receptor antibody in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 2699

    Google Scholar 

  33. Borssum Waalkes M van (1992) Lipophilic derivatives of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine as liposomal anticancer agents. Thesis, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schwendener RA (1986) The preparation of large volumes of homogeneous, sterile liposomes containing various lipophilic cytotoxic drugs by the use of a capillary dialyzer. Cancer Drug Deliv 3: 123

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nishizawa Y, Casida JE, Anderson SW, Heidelberger C (1965) 3′,5′-Diesters of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine: synthesis and biological activity. Biochem Pharmacol 14: 1605

    Google Scholar 

  36. Supersaxo A, Rubas W, Hartmann H, Schott H, Hengartner H, Schwendener RA (1988) The antitumor effect of lipophilic derivatives of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine incorporated into liposomes. J Microencapsulation 5: 1

    Google Scholar 

  37. Borssum Waalkes M van, Scherphof GL (1990) Liposome-incorporated 3′,5′-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine as a slow-release anti-tumor drug depot in rat liver macrophages. Select Cancer Ther 6: 15

    Google Scholar 

  38. Borssum Waalkes M van, Fichtner I, Dontje BHJ, Lemm M, Becker M, Arndt D, Scherphof GL (1992) In vivo distribution and antitumor activity of liposomal 3′, 5′-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine. J Microencapsulation 9: 335

    Google Scholar 

  39. Blumenthal RD, Sharkey RM, Haywood L, Natale AM, Wong GY, Siegel JA, Kennel SJ, Goldenberg DM (1992) Targeted therapy of athymic mice bearing GW-39 human colonic cancer micrometastases with131I-labeled monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res 52: 6036

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ahmad I, Allen TM (1992) Antibody-mediated specific binding and cytotoxicity of liposome-entrapped doxorubicin to lung cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Res 52: 4817

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ahmad I, Longenecker M, Samuel J, Allen TM (1993) Antibody-targeted delivery of doxorubicin entrapped in sterically stabilized liposomes can eradicate lung cancer in mice. Cancer Res 53: 1484

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This manuscript was authored by a contractor of the United States Government under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400. Accordingly, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free licence to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mori, A., Kennel, S.J., van Borssum Waalkes, M. et al. Characterization of organ-specific immunoliposomes for delivery of 3′,5′-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine in a mouse lung-metastasis model. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 35, 447–456 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686828

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686828

Key words

Navigation