Skip to main content
Log in

Amphetamine and apomorphine restore tactile placing after motor cortex injury in the cat

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unilateral motor cortex injury in the cat results in a prolonged loss of tactile placing in the forelimb contralateral to the injury. Amphetamine (5 mg/kg) temporarily reverses this tactile placing deficit as early as 4 days following the injury. Racemic amphetamine was found to produce a significantly more prolonged restoration of placing than the d isomer, which was significantly more effective than the l isomer. Haloperidol (0.4 mg/kg) blocked the amphetamineinduced recovery of placing responses and also blocked placing in nondrugged cats showing partial spontaneous recovery. This dosage of haloperidol had no effect on tactile placing in normal cats. Apomorphine at moderate dosages (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) produced a weak restoration of tactile placing in motor cortex-injured animals. These pharmacological data suggest that the loss of tactile placing after motor cortex injury is due to a depression of catecholaminergic function, which is temporarily reversible by catecholaminergic stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins RJ, Cegnar MR, Pafuse DD (1971) Differential effects of lesions of the anterior and posterior sigmoid gyri in cats. Brain Res 30: 411–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Amassian VE, Ross RJ (1978) Developing role of sensorimotor cortex and pyramidal tract neurons in contact placing in kittens. J Physiol (Paris) 74:165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Andén NE, Butcher SG, Corrodi H, Fuxe F, Ungerstedt U (1970) Receptor activity and turnover of dopamine and noradrenaline after neuroleptics. Eur J Pharmacol 11:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard P, Brooks CM (1932) Localized cortical control of some postural reactions in the cat and rat together with evidence that small cortical remnants may function normally. Proc Assoc Res Neural Ment Dis 13:107–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard P (1933) Studies on the cerebral cortex. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 30:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogen JE, Suzuki M, Campbell S (1975) Paw contact placing in the hypothalamic cat given caffeine. J Neurobiol 6:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyeson MG, Feeney DM (1982) Catecholamine levels in rats following motor cortex injury and amphetamine administration. Neurosci Abstr 8:484

    Google Scholar 

  • Dail WG, Feeney DM, Murray HM, Linn RT, Boyeson MG (1981) Responses to cortical injury. II. Widespread depression of the activity of an enzyme in cortex remote from a focal injury. Brain Res 211:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest AM (1967) Mode of action of apomorphine and dexamphetamine on gnawing compulsion in rats. Psychopharmacology 10:316–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest AM, Smelik PG (1966) Site of action of dopamine and apomorphine on compulsive gnawing in rats. Experientia 22:837–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney DM, Wier CS (1979) Sensory neglect after lesions of substantia nigra or lateral hypothalamus: Differential severity and recovery of function. Brain Res 178:329–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Murray HM, Dail WG (1980) Amphetamine produces an enduring recovery of locomotor functioning after motor cortex injury in the rat. Neurosci Abstr 6:802

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Law WA (1981) Amphetamine restores locomotor function after motor cortex injury in the rat. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 24:15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Law WA (1982) Amphetamine, haloperidol and experience interact to effect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science 217:855–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney DM, Hovda DA (1980) Amphetamine restores tactile placing after motor cortex lesions. Fed Proc 39:63

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman RB (1971) Discrimination of passively received kinesthetic stimuli following sensorimotor cortical ablation in cats. Physiol Behav 7:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves PM, Rebec GV (1976) Biochemistry and behavior: Some central actions of amphetamine and antipsychotic drugs. Annu Rev Psychol 27:91–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovda DA, Feeney DM (1981) A single dose of d-amphetamine produces an enduring recovery of locomotion after motor cortex injury in the cat. Neurosci Abstr 7:930

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovda DA, Feeney DM (1982) Multiple doses of amphetamine combined with locomotor experience produces a marked acceleration of recovery of locomotion following motor cortex injury in cat. Neurosci Abstr 8:358

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehne JH, Sorenson CA (1978) The effects of pimozide and phenoxybenzamine pretreatments on amphetamine and apomorphine potentiation of the acoustic startle response in rats. Psychopharmacology 58:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Macht MB (1950) Effects of d-amphetamine on hemidecorticate, decorticate and decrebrate cats. Fed Proc 63:731–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Massion J, Roll R, Swett JE (1981) Effect of sensorimotor cortical ablation on the placing reaction in the standing cat. Arch Ital Biol 119:108–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer PM, Hovel JA, Meyer DR (1963) Effects of d,l-amphetamine upon placing responses in neodecorticate cats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 56:402–404

    Google Scholar 

  • von Monakow C (1969) Diaschisis. In: Pribam K (ed) Brain and behavior. Penguin, Baltimore, pp 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RY, Bhatnager RK, Heller A (1971) Anatomical and chemical studies of a nigroneostriatal projection in the cat. Brain Res 30:119–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RG, Shoemaker WJ, Schlumpf M (1980) Time course of changes in catecholamines following right hemispheric cerebral infarction in the rat. Brain Res 181:202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerstedt U (1971) Striatal dopamine release after amphetamine or nerve degeneration revealed by rotational behavior. Acta Physiol Scand (Suppl) 367:49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Villablanca JR, Marcus RJ, Olmstead CE, Avery DL (1976) Effects of caudate nuclei or frontal cortex ablations in cats. III. Recovery of limb placing reactions including observations in hemispherictomized animals. Exp Neurol 53:289–303

    Google Scholar 

  • West JR, Deadwyler S, Cotman CW, Lynch G (1975) Time-dependent changes in commissural field potentials in the dentate gyrus following lesions of the entorhinal cortex in adult rats. Brain Res 97:215–233

    Google Scholar 

  • West JR (1978) The concept of diaschisis: A reply to Markowitsch and Pritzel. Behav Biol 22:413–416

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feeney, D.M., Hovda, D.A. Amphetamine and apomorphine restore tactile placing after motor cortex injury in the cat. Psychopharmacology 79, 67–71 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433018

Key words

Navigation