Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus

  • Published:
Psychopharmacologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of mescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylethylamine), a hallucinogen, can function as a discriminative stimulus in appropriately trained rats. As a test of the hypothesis that those pharmacologic properties which distinguish hallucinogens and non-hallucinogens in man are reflected in distinctive stimuli in rats, the present experiments examined the effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus. Administration of a range of doses of DOM and DOET to subjects in which saline functioned as SD and mescaline as Sδ revealed that a dose of 0.3 mg of either DOM or DOET was equivalent to the training dose of mescaline. When tested in rats in which mescaline served as SD, DOM and DOET were likewise found to mimic mescaline. In contrast, doses of d-amphetamine and cocaine (1 and 30 mg/kg, respectively) which were equivalent to the training dose of mescaline as Sδ, did not result in responding appropriate for the mescaline condition when mescaline was trained as SD. When DOET (0.3 mg/kg) was substituted for saline as Sδ, no evidence of discriminated responding was obtained in the course of 50 sessions. The present data, in conjunction with previous observations, suggest that those effects of mescaline in the rat which function as a discriminative stimulus are better correlated with pre-hallucinogenic LSD-like activity in man then with hallucinogenic activity per se. Thus, these effects in rats represent a necessary but not a sufficient condition for prediction of hallucinogenic activity in man.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, H.: Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed. Proc. 33, 1814–1824 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalampous, K. D.: Comparison of metabolism of mescaline and 3,4-dimethoxyphenylethylamine in humans. Behav. Neuropsychiat. 2, 26–29 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalampous, K. D., Tansey, L. W.: Metabolic fate of Β-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-ethylamine in man. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 155, 318–329 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, P. H.: Amphetamine psychosis. London: Oxford University Press 1958

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. D., Cavanaugh, J., Held, J., Oates, J. A.: Dextroamphetamine, Evaluation of psychotomimetic properties in man. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 26, 97–100 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, I. D., Winter, J. C.: Mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) as discriminative stimuli. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 22, 64–71 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollister, L. E., Friedhoff, A. J.: Effects of 3,4-dimethoxyphenylethylamine in man. Nature (Lond.) 210, 1377–1378 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollister, L. E., MacNicol, M. F., Gillespie, H. K.: An hallucinogenic amphetamine analog (DOM) in man. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 14, 62–73 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.-T., Ho, B. T.: Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine and related compounds in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2, 669–673 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. M., Waskow, I. E., Olsson, J.: Characterizing the psychological state produced by LSD. J. abnorm. Psychol. 73, 1–4 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., Morse, W. H.: Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. In: Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and experimental pharmacology, Vol. 60, pp. 2–56. New York: Springer 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulgin, A. T.: Psychotomimetic amphetamines: methoxy-3,4-dialkoxyamphetamines. Experientia (Basel) 20, 366–367 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulgin, A. T., Sargent, T., Naranjo, C.: Role of 3,4-dimethoxyphenylethylamine in schizophrenia. Nature (Lond.) 212, 1606–1607 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotta, K. H., Müller, J.: über den Abbau des Mescalins und mescalinÄhnlicher Stoffe im Organismus. Hoppe-Seylers Z. physiol. Chem. 238, 14–22 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. H., Faillace, L., Hollister, L.: 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (STP): A new hallucinogenic drug. Science 158, 669–670 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. H., Faillace, L. A., Weingartner, H.: DOM (STP), a new hallucinogenic drug, and DOET; effects in normal subjects. Amer. J. Psychiat. 125, 357–364 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. H., Faillace, L. A., Weingartner, H.: A new psychotropic agent. Psychological and physiological effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-amphetamine (DORT) in man. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 21, 95–101 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. H., Weingartner, H., Faillace, L. A.: DOET (2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine and DOM (STP) (2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine), new psychotropic agents: their effects in man. In: Psychotomimetic drugs, D. H. Efron, ed., pp. 247–264. New York: Raven 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. H., Weingartner, H., Faillace, L. A.: DOET (2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine, a new psychotropic drug. Effects of varying doses in man. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 24, 50–55 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. H., Ungar, S., Blatchley, R., Barfknecht, C. F.: Stereospecific actions of DOET (2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine) in man. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 31, 103–106 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. C.: A comparison of the stimulus properties of mescaline and 2,3,4-trimethoxyphenylethylamine. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 185, 101–107 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. C.: Hallucinogens as discriminative stimuli. Fed. Proc. 33, 1825–1832 (1974a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. C.: The effects of 3,4-dimethoxyphenylethylamine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 189, 741–747 (1974b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D., Scoville, W. B.: Paranoid psychosis in narcolepsy and possible danger in benzedrine treatment. Med. clin. N. Amer. 22, 637–645 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported in part by Grant 15406 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winter, J.C. The effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus. Psychopharmacologia 44, 29–32 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421179

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421179

Key words

Navigation