Skip to main content
Log in

On the nature of the span of apprehension

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Typically, people can only report about four or five items from a briefly presented array of alphanumeric items. A new span task was used to explore the basis of this limitation. In Experiment l, performance suffered when very brief display durations were combined with a verbal-load task, but no significant effects of display duration were found when there was no verbal load. In Experiment 2, a similar interaction was observed between verbal load and the presence of a visual suffix; performance was worse in the verbal-load condition with a visual suffix, but no such effect was observed without verbal load. In both experiments, poorer performance was associated with enhanced serial-position effects. The results can be explained on the assumption that the verbal-load task required some processing resources, and that the quality of information in visual working memory depends on available resources. Thus, both brief-array presentation and the visual suffix degrade the information in visual working memory, but span performance is impaired only when processing resources are relatively scarce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briand, K. A., & Klein, R. M. (1988). Conceptual masking in brief visual displays. Canadian Journal ofPsychology, 42, 496–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. (1885). On the time required for recognizing and naming letters and words, pictures and colors. Philosophische Studien, 2, 635–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 183–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crannell, C. W., & Parrish, J. M. (1957). A comparison of immediate memory span for digits, letters and words. Journal of Psychology, 44, 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. O. (1971). On the problem of selection in short-term visual (iconic) memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 25, 250–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lollo, V. (1978). On the spatio-temporal interactions of brief visual displays. In R. H. Day & G. V. Stanley (Eds.), Studies in perception (pp. 39–55). Perth: University of Western Australia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lollo, V., & Dixon, P. (1988). Two forms of persistence in visual information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 671- 681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lollo, V., & Moscovitch, M. (1983). Perceptual interference between spatially separate sequential displays. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 414–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. (1985). The category effect in visual detection and partial report. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 286–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. (1986). Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., & Di Lollo, V. (1991). Effects of display luminance, stimulus type, and probe duration on visible and schematic persistence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 54–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., & Twilley, L. T. (1988). Location confusions in visual information processing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 378–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, A. (1980). Attributes and priorities in short-term recall: A new model of memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 208–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1982). Similarity-related channel interaction in visual processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 353–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K., & Taylor, H. A. (1964). A detection method and probabilistic model for assessing information processing from brief visual displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 52, 446–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, R. W. (1989). Recency and the modality effect in immediate ordered recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 43, 494–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G. T. (1973). Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 130–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. E., & Yeomans, J. M. (1986). Sensory registration and informational persistence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R., Johnson, C. A., & Shimamura, A. P. (1985). How much is an icon worth? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merikle, P. M., & Coltheart, M. (1972). Selective forward masking Canadian Journal of Psychology 26, 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merikle, P. M., Coltheart, M., Lowe, D. G. (1971). On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 25, 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewhort, D. J. K. (1974). Accuracy and order of report in tachistoscopic identification. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewhort, D. J. K., & Campbell, A. J. (1978). Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W. A., & Christie, D. F. M. (1977). Components of visual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, I., & Norman, D. A. (1964). A nonparametric analysis of recognition experiments. ,Psychonomic Science 1, 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, D. L. (1972). Memory for brief visual displays of symbols. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 408–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74 (Whole No. 498).

  • Sperling, G. (1963). A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 5, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. (1967). Successive approximations to a model for shortterm memory. Acta Psychologica, 27, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G., & Speelman, R. G. (1970). Acoustic similarity and auditory short-term memory: Experiments and a model. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, V. M. (1973). Loss of spatial and identity information following a tachistoscopic exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T. (1978). Visual processing and short-term memory. In Human information processing (Vol. 5, pp. 91–142).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981). Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity and intrusion errors in short-term memory. Jorunal of Experimental Psychology 70 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, G. (1975). Perturbation model for letter identification. Psychological Review, 82, 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, G., & Hollingsworth, S, (1974 a). Evidence that short-term memory is not the limiting factor in the tachistoscopic full-report procedure. Memory & Cognition, 2, 796–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, G., & Hollingsworth, S. (1974b). Retinal location and string position as important variables in visual information processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 437–442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, P., Shedden, J.M. On the nature of the span of apprehension. Psychol. Res 55, 29–39 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419891

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419891

Keywords

Navigation