Skip to main content
Log in

Reverse “repetition blindness” and release from “repetition blindness”: Constructive variations on the “repetition blindness” effect

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

N. Kanwisher observed that subjects shown rapid lists of words recall two occurrences of a repeated word less often than two unrelated words. Kanwisher explained this “repetition blindness” through a type/token account, which assumes that encoding the second occurrence of a repeated word is inhibited if it occurs too soon after the first. More fundamentally, it assumes that failure to recall a word from a rapid list results from failure to encode its occurrence. Contrary to that interpretation, we observed that subjects can often recognize words that they cannot recall from a rapid list. We also observed “reverse repetition blindness,” when the second presentation was given greater contextual support, and a “release from repetition blindness” effect, when distinctive contextual support was given to each occurrence. We concluded that a constructive account of remembering provides a better explanation of all of the effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, I. T., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in RSVP displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21, 1044–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18, 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, P., & Kanwisher, N. G. (1995). Types and tokens unscathed: A reply to Whittlesea, Dorken and Podrouzek. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1698–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., & Birtwhistle, J. (1972). Retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 11,778–783..

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H.L. Roediger & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M. C. (1989). Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement. Memory & Cognition, 17, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16, 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Review. 87, 252–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J., Caldwell, J. I., & Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1996). When lust is lost: Orthographic similarity effects in the encoding and reconstruction of rapidly presented word lists. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20, 500–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Psotka, J. (1971). Retroactive inhibition in free recall: Inaccessibility of information available in the memory store. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 87, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review. 80, 352–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 19, 1235–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Podrouzek, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: Part 2. Remembering repetitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 21, 1689–1687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., Dorken, M. D., & Podrouzek, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: Part 1. Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 21, 1670–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, D. D. (1973). Some characteristics of word encoding. Memory & Cognition. 1, 485–490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. W. A. Whittlesea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whittlesea, B.W.A., Wai, K.H. Reverse “repetition blindness” and release from “repetition blindness”: Constructive variations on the “repetition blindness” effect. Psychol. Res 60, 173–182 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419765

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419765

Keywords

Navigation