Skip to main content
Log in

Linear correlation-based learning models require a two-stage process for the development of orientation and ocular dominance

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In our contribution we demonstrate, that orientation (OR) and ocular dominance (OD) cannot develop simultaneously in linear correlation-based learning (CBL) models, because OR and OD occupy separate domains in parameter space. We then analyse the conditions under which waves of spontaneous activity — as have been observed in the developing retina — may give rise at least to OR or OD. We find that in linear CBL models there must be subcortical convergence of ON/OFF as well as left eye/right eye pathways. We present a biologically plausible scenario in which the subcortical connectivity patterns resemble a competitive neural network and argue that OR and OD can robustly emerge, if a two-stage developmental process is assumed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.Erwin, K.Obermayr, and K.Schuiten, “Models of orientation and ocular dominance columns in the visual cortex: A critical comparison”, Neural Computation, Vol. 7, pp. 425–468, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.LeVay, T.N.Wiesel, and D.Hubel, “The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys”, Journal of Comparative Neurology, Vol. 191, pp. 1–51, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.Linsker, “From basic network principles to neural architecture: Emergence of orientation columns”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 83, pp. 8779–8783, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.D.Miller, “A model for the development of simple cell receptive fields and the ordered arrangements of orientation columns through activity-dependent competition between ON- and OFF-center inputs”, Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 14, pp. 409–441, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.D.Miller, J.B.Keller, and M.P.Stryker, “Ocular dominance column development: Analysis and simulation”, Science, Vol. 245, pp. 605–615, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.Obermayer and G.G.Blasdel, “Geometry of orientation and ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex”, Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 13, pp. 4114–4129, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.C.Pape and U.T.Eysel, “Binocular interactions in the laterial geniculate nucleus of the cat: Gabaergic inhibition reduced by dominant afferent activity”, Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 61, pp. 265–71, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.Stetter, A.Müller, and E.W.Lang, “Neural network model for the coordinated formation of orietnation preference and orientation selectivity maps”, Physical Review E, Vol. 50, pp. 4167–4181, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.N.Wiesel and D.H.Hubel, “Ordered arrangement of orientation columns in monkeys lacking visual experience”, Journal of Comparative Neurology, Vol. 158, pp. 307–318, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.O.L.Wong, M.Meister, and C.J.Shatz, “Transient period of correlated bursting activity during development of the mammalian retina”, Neuron, Vol. 11, pp. 923–938, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piepenbrock, C., Ritter, H. & Obermayer, K. Linear correlation-based learning models require a two-stage process for the development of orientation and ocular dominance. Neural Process Lett 3, 31–37 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417787

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417787

Key words

Navigation