Skip to main content
Log in

Coexistence between the seastars Asterias vulgaris and A. forbesi in a heterogeneous environment: A non-equilibrium explanation

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The interaction between the sympatric, predaceous seastars, Asterias forbesi and A. vulgaris was studied for five years at eight study sites in northern New England. These species range in depth from the low intertidal to at least 50 m and cooccur over a broad geographic range from central Maine to Cape Hatteras. Both overlap greatly in times and intensity of feeding, body size, diet composition and size of prey consumed. Variations occur in these characteristics from site to site but are always positively correlated.

Such similarity along resource dimensions is generally taken to indicate that species compete for resources. In this study, interspecific competition does not seem to occur. Though these seastars are generally smaller than their potential size, and food seems in short supply in some subhabitats, food seems unlimited in other subhabitats. Hence, exploitation competition probably occurs sporadically, not chronically, and is probably a weak selective agent. Laboratory experiments suggest that neither intra- nor interspecific aggression occurs between these seastars. Hence, interference competition seems non-existent in this case.

Observations of massive mortality from disease and storms, large variations in seastar density, and a patchy food supply suggests that these populations are generally held below carrying capacity by a kaleidoscopic suite of selective agents. Under such conditions resource shortage would be unlikely to exert strong selective pressure. The high overlaps are thus most likely a reflection of the general absence of pressure to subdivide resources rather than an indication of severe competition.

In studies of competition, ecological overlaps should be supplemented by other evidence, including experiments before they can be used as indications of competitive pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P.: Limiting similarity and the form of the competition coefficient. Theor. Pop. Biol. 8, 356–375 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P.: Density-independent mortality and interspecific competition; a test of Pianka's niche overlap hypothesis. Am. Natur. 111, 539–552 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, G.M.: Interspecific competition experienced by South African Patella species. J. Anim. Ecol. 45, 507–529 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkeland, C.E.: Interactions between a sea pen and seven of its predators. Ecol. Monogr. 44, 211–232 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carefoot, T.: Pacific Seashores. A Guide to Intertidal Ecology. Seattle: University of Washington Press 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, T., Gilpin, M.E.: Interference competition and niche theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 3073–3077 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H.: Predator-mediated coexistence: a non-equilibrium model. Am. Natur. 112, 127–154 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A.M.: Feeding biology of the seastar Astropecten irregularis Pennant. Ophelia 8, 1–134 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L.: Competition and the structure of bird communities. Monographs in Population Biology 7. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R.K., Futuyma, D.J.: On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 52, 567–576 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H.: The influence of competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42, 710–723 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H.: Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 169–192 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H.: Ecology: field experiments in marine ecology (R. Mariscal, ed.), pp. 21–54. Experimental Marine Biology. New York: Academic Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H.: Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities; a model and evidence from field experiments. In: Ecology and Evolution of communities (M.L. Cody, J. Diamond, eds.), pp. 460–490. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H.: Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.W.: Species diversity and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology 58, 711–724 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P.K.: Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351–389 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P.K.: Two cases of resource partitioning in an intertidal community: making the right prediction for the wrong reason. Am. Natur. 107, 662–670 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J.M.: The role of time and energy in food preference. Am. Natur. 100 611–617 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D.E.: Intrinsic rate of increase, saturation density, and competitive ability. II. The evolution of competitive ability. Am. Natur. 108, 103–116 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D.E., Hairston, N.G.: The dynamics of a natural population of Paramecium and the role of interspecific competition in community structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 41, 137–151 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosner, K.L.: Guide to identification of marine and estuarine invertebrates: Cape Hatteras to the Bay of Fundy. New York: Wiley-Interscience 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Haven, S.B.: Competition for food between the intertidal gastropods Acmaea scabra and A. digitalis. Ecology 54, 143–151 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, H.S.: The measurement of “overlap” in ecological studies. Am. Natur. 100, 419–424 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, R.G.: Competitive exclusion as a factor influencing the distributions of two species of terrestrial salamanders. Ecology 52, 632–637 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, R.G.: Food as a limited resource in competition between two terrestrial salamanders. Ecology 53, 535–546 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landenberger, D.E.: Studies on selective feeding in the Pacific starfish Pisaster in southern California. Ecology 49, 1062–1075 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J., Menge, B.A.: Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecol. Monogr. 48, 67–94 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H.: Geographical Ecology. New York: Harper and Row 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H., Levins, R.: The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Natur. 101, 377–385 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H., Pianka, E.R.: On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Natur. 100, 603–609 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K.H.: Destruction of kelp-beds by sea-urchins: A cyclical phenomenon or irreversible degradation? Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters. 30, 455–467 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauzey, K.P., Birkeland, C.E., Dayton, P.K.: Feeding behavior of asteroids and escape responses of their prey in the Puget Sound region. Ecology 49, 603–619 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M.: Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Monographs in Population Biology 6, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M.: Some notes on estimating the competition matrix, α. Ecology 56, 737–741 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. (ed.): Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M., MacArthur, R.H.: Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 1109–1113 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A.: Foraging strategy of a starfish in relation to actual prey availability and environmental predictability. Ecol. Monogr. 42, 25–50 (1972a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A.: Competition for food between two intertidal starfish species and its effect on body size and feeding. Ecology 53, 635–644 (1972b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A.: Effect of wave action and competition on brooding and reproductive effort in the seastar Leptasterias hexactis. Ecology 55, 84–93 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A.: Brood or broadcast? The adaptive significance of different reproductive strategies in the two intertidal seastars Leptasterias hexactis and Pisaster ochraceus. Mar. Biol. 31, 81–100 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A.: Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol. Monogr. 46, 355–393 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A.: Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community: relation between predator foraging activity and environmental harshness. Oecologia 34, 1–16 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A., Sutherland, J.P.: Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition, and temporal heterogeneity. Am. Natur. 110, 351–369 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, J.L., Menge, B.: Role of resource allocation, aggression, and spatial heterogeneity in coexistence of two competing intertidal starfish. Ecol. Monogr. 44, 189–209 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, R.W.: Fieldbook of Seashore Life. New York: G.P. Putman's Sons 1950

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisita, M.: Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Series E (Biol) 3, 65–80 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R.T.: Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Natur. 100, 65–75 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R.T.: The Pisaster-Tegula interaction: prey patches, predator food preference and intertidal community structure. Ecology 50, 950–961 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R.T.: A short-term experimental investigation of resource partitioning in a New Zealand rocky intertidal habitat. Ecology 52, 1096–1106 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R.T.: Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15, 93–120 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R.T.: Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology 57, 858–873 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C.H., Bradley, B.P.: Estimating the diet of a sluggish predator from field observations. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 35, 136–141 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R.: r and K selection or b and d selection? Am. Natur. 106, 581–588 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R.: Niche overlap and diffuse competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 2141–2145 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R.: Competition and niche theory. In: Theoretical Ecology: Principles and application (R.M. May, ed.), pp. 114–141. Philadelphia W.B. Saunders Co 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, W.J., Weis, I.M.: Resource partitioning and competition within a guild of fugitive prairie plants. Am. Natur. 111, 479–513 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymont, J.E.G.: Plankton and productivity in the Ocean. New York: Pergamon Press 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson, T.B., Bellamy, L.S.: The establishment of interspecific competition in field populations, with an example of competition in action between Polycelis nigra (Mull.) and P. tenuis (Ijima) (Turbellaria, Tricladida). Proc. Adv. Stud. Inst. Dyn. Numbers Pop., 1970, 282–297 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J.: Species packing and the competition function with illustrations from coral reef fish. Theor. Pop. Biol. 5, 163–186 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J.: Feldman, M.: Species packing and predation pressure. Ecology 56, 489–492 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W.: Theory of feeding strategies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2, 369–404 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopf, T.J.M., Murphy, L.S.: Protein polymorphism of the hybridizing seastars Asterias forbesi and A. vulgaris and implications for their evolution. Biol. Bull. 145, 589–597 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumich, J.L.: An introduction to the biology of marine life. Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown Co 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A.J.: An experimental evaluation of competition between three species of intertidal prosobranch gastropods. Oecologia (Berl.) 33, 185–202 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A.: On competition and variable environments. Am. Sci. 65, 590–597 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menge, B.A. Coexistence between the seastars Asterias vulgaris and A. forbesi in a heterogeneous environment: A non-equilibrium explanation. Oecologia 41, 245–272 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377430

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377430

Keywords

Navigation