Skip to main content
Log in

Motivational determinants of motor performance: The hidden second task

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The present study was designed to test facilitating and debilitating effects of motivational processes on motor behavior. It was predicted that motivational processes have a more pronounced effect on motor performance when control is frequently transferred to attentional mechanisms (i. e., early in the acquisition phase). The results were consistent with this expectation. A strong motive to achieve success and pretreatment designed to enhance achievement motivation were associated with an increase in the quality of performance. A strong tendency to engage in state-oriented cognitive activities, by contrast, (e.g., thinking about the potential threat to one's selfesteem resulting from failure) was associated with poorer performance, It is concluded that experiments on motor behavior in which subjects are instructed to perform a single motor task may actually involve dual-task (or even multiple-task) performance if some part of the subjects' attentional capacity is used for task-irrelevant cognitive activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, J.W. (1958). Motives in Fantasy, Action, and Society. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.W. & Birch, D. (1970). The Dynamics of Action. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.W. & Cartwright, D. (1964). Some neglected variables in contemporary conceptions of decision and performance. Psychological Reports, 14 575–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.W. & Feather, N.T. (1966). A Theory of Achievement Motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. (1967). The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford, Eng.: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. & Scheier, M.F. (1981). Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. & Scheier, M.F. (In press). A control-systems approach to the self-regulation of action. In: J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. New York: Springer, in press.

  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1963). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation. Meisenheim: Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1 283–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D.H. (Ed.) (1981). Human Skills. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1977). Meß- und prozeßtheoretische Analysen einiger Person- und Situationsparameter der Leistungsmotivation. Bonn: Bouvier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1979). Standard setting and risk preference: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation and an empirical test. Psychological Review, 85 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1981). Motivational and functional helplessness: The moderating effect of state versus action orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1983). Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In: B.A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in Experimental Personality Research (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. & Blankenship, V. (1979). The dynamic theory of achievement motivation: From episodic to dynamic thinking. Psychological Review, 86 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. & Weiß, M. (1983). Performance deficits following uncontrollable failure: Impaired action control or global attributions and generalized expectancy deficits. Manuscript submitted for publication. Max-Planck-Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, FRG, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, G.C. (1962). Aphorismen, Briefe, Satiren. Düsseldorf: Diederichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3 157–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P.D. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29 651–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W.T. (1973). Behavior: The Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W.T. (1978). Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychological Review, 85 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Requin, J., Bonnet, M. & Semjen, A. (1977). Is there a specificity in the supraspinal control of motor structures during preparation? In: S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J.J. (1981). Motor programs. In: D.H. Holding (Ed.), Human Skills (pp. 41–117), New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucholsky, K. (1967). Gesammelte Werke. Band 1 (1907–1924), Reinbeck: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpert, W. (1974). Handlungsstrukuranalyse als Beitrag zur Qualifikationsforschung. Köln: Paul-Rugenstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J.D. (1982). Evaluation anxiety: A cognitive-attentional construct. In: Krohne, H.W. & Laux, L.C. (Eds.), Achievement, Stress, and Anxiety. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuhl, J., Koch, B. Motivational determinants of motor performance: The hidden second task. Psychol. Res 46, 143–153 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308599

Keywords

Navigation