Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling behavior of starlings foraging in simple patchy environments

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Starlings were allowed to forage in patchy laboratory environments where patches contained either zero or a fixed number of prey. The condition of a given patch (prey or no prey) could only be determined from information gained while exploiting the patch. A starling's task was to determine to what extent to sample an apparently prey-less patch before giving it up as such, in a way which maximizes long-term energy intake rate. The simple model presented to predict the optimal sampling solutions was qualitatively but not quantitatively supported by the data. The main discrepancy was in the fact that an apparently prey-less patch should have been sampled to a fixed extent before leaving, whereas a distribution of sampling behavior was actually observed. The qualitative agreement was very good, however, as the modes of the observed sampling distributions often corresponded to the predicted optimal sampling solutions. Starlings seem to possess a patch-sampling ability which, at least for those simple situations analyzed, can lead to an efficient foraging strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breck JE (1978) Suboptimal foraging strategies for a patchy environment. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University

  • Caraco T, Martindale S, Whittam TS (1980) An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim Behav 28:820–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RF (1980) Bayesian birds: a simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging. Theor Popul Biol 18:244–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RF (1984) Stopping rules for optimal foragers. Am Nat 123:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston A, Kacelnik A, McNamara J (1982) Some learning rules for acquiring information. In: McFarland D (ed) Functional ontogeny. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Masahiko H, Yamamura N (1981) Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Am Nat 117:710–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Ryan JC, Charnov EL (1974) Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study in patch use by chickadees. Anim Behav 22:953–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Stephens DW, Sutherland J (1983) Perspectives in optimal foraging. In: Brush AH, Clark GA (eds) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1984) Downy woodpecker foraging behavior: efficient sampling in simple stochastic environments. Ecology 65:166–174

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara J (1982) Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theor Popul Biol 21:269–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaten A (1977) Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. Theor Popul Biol 12:263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San Fransico

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Charnov EL (1982) Optimal foraging: some simple stochastic models. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:251–263

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lima, S.L. Sampling behavior of starlings foraging in simple patchy environments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16, 135–142 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295147

Keywords

Navigation