Summary
Rats with prefrontal cortex (PFC) lesions or sham operations were tested for acquisition and reversal learning with tactile-visual stimuli. PFC rats performed extremely poorly during acquisition and also differed from control rats in reversal learning. Both higher-order processing and subtle motoric dysfunctions may have combined to account for the marked effects of these cortex lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker JT, Walker JA, Olton DS (1980) Neuroanatomical bases of spatial memory. Brain Res 200: 307–320
Finger S, Frommer GP (1986) Effects of cortical lesions on tactile discriminations graded in difficulty. Life Sci 7: 897–904
Gabriel S, Freer B, Finger S (1979) Brain damage and the overlearning reversal effect. Physiol Psychol 7: 327–332
Jeeves MA (1967) Some paradoxical effects of bilateral lesions in the frontal cortex in rats. Neuropsychologia 5: 73–84
Kling JO, Bartley KS (1974) Effects of frontal ablations on visual discrimination in the rat. J Gen Psychol 91: 305–306
Kolb B (1984) Functions of the frontal cortex of the rat: a comparative review. Brain Res Rev 8: 65–98
Neafsey EJ, Sievert C (1982) A second forelimb motor area exists in rat frontal cortex. Brain Res 232: 151–156
Neafsey EJ, Bold EL, Hurley-Gius KM, Quirk G, Sievert CF, Terreberry RR (1986) The organization of the rat motor cortex: a microstimulation mapping study. Brain Res Rev 11: 7796
Weis BJ, Means LW (1980) A comparison of the effects of medial frontal, dorsomedial thalamic, and combination lesions on discrimination and spontaneous alternation in the rat. Physiol Psychol 8: 325–329
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This project was supported in part by BRSG S07 RR07054-19 awarded by the Biomedical Research Support Grant Program, Division of Research Resources, National Institute of Health
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doar, B., Finger, S. & Almli, C.R. Tactile-visual acquisition and reversal learning deficits in rats with prefrontal cortical lesions. Exp Brain Res 66, 432–434 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243317
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243317