Skip to main content
Log in

The relation between the direction dependence of electromyographic amplitude and motor unit recruitment thresholds during isometric contractions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The activation of muscles can be studied by measuring the activity of a representative set of single motor units in a muscle or by measuring the surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of a muscle that results from the contribution of a large number of motor units. In this study we have developed a model showing how the direction dependence of the amplitude of the EMG activity during isometric contractions can be understood from the recruitment thresholds of single motor units when force is applied in various directions within a plane. The model predicts that the direction with the largest EMG activity (called the “preferred direction”) corresponds to the direction in which the largest number of motor units is recruited. If one assumes homogeneous activation of a population of motor units, this preferred direction can be shown to be equivalent to the direction in which the recruitment threshold of the motor units is smallest. The experimental data show that, for most muscles in the human arm, the amplitude of surface EMG activity for a constant, isometric force at the wrist was proportional to the cosine of the angle between the muscle's preferred direction and the direction of force. As predicted by the model, the preferred direction coincided with the direction in which the recruitment threshold of motor units was smallest. Musculus deltoideus anterior had a more complicated directional sensitivity for surface EMG activity that could not be well fit by a single cosine function. This effect could be explained by the finding of two subpopulations of motor units within that muscle, each with a different recruitment behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buchanan TS, Almdale DPJ, Lewis JL, Rymer WZ (1986) Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. J Neurophysiol 56:1225–1241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan TS, Rovai GP, Rymer WZ (1989) Strategies for muscle activation during isometric torque generation at the human elbow. J Neurophysiol 62:1201–1212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calancie B, Bawa P (1990) Motor unit recruitment in humans. In: Binder M, Mendell LM (eds) The orderly recruitment of motor units. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 75–95

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca CJ (1979) Physiology and mathematics of myoelectric signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 26:359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca CJ, Leferer RS, McCue MP, Xenakis AP (1982) Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions. J Physiol 359:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders M, Soechting JF (1990) Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 64:1818–1837

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen S, Ingen Schenau GJ van, Tax T, Theeuwen M (1990) The activation of mono- and bi-articular muscles in multi-joint movements. In: Winters JM, Woo SLY (eds) Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1971) Dynamic relationship between isometric muscle tension and the electromyogram in man. J Appl Physiol 30:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson B, Pinter MJ (1985) On factors determining orderly recruitment of motor units: a role for intrinsic membrane properties. Trends Neurosci 8:431–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Haar Romeny BM ter, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1982) Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle. Exp Neurol 78:360–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Haar Romeny BM ter, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1984) Relation of the location of a motor unit in human biceps muscle and its critical firing levels for different tasks. Exp Neurol 85:631–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henneman E (1981) Recruitment of motoneurons: the size principle. In: Motor unit types, recruitment, and plasticity in health and disease. In: Desmed JE (ed) Progress in clinical neurophysiology, vol 9. Karger, Basel, pp 26–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO (1965a) Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 28:581–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO (1965b) Excitability and inhibitibility of motoneurons of different size. J Neurophysiol 28:599–620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jongen H (1989) Theories and experiments on muscle coordination during isometric contractions. Thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukulka CG, Ciamann HP (1981) Comparison of the recruitment and discharge properties of motor units in human brachial biceps and adductor pollicis during isometric contractions Exp Brain Res 219:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippold OJC (1952) The relation between integrated action potentials in human muscle and its isometric tension. J Physiol (Lond) 117:492–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LE, Gielen CCAM, Theeuwen M, Doorenbosch D (1992) The activation of mono-and biarticular muscles in multijoint movements. In: Caminiti R, Johnson PB, Burnod Y (eds) Control of arm movement in space. Neurophysiological and computational approaches. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York pp, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE, Hudgins BS, Scott RN (1982) Myoelectric signal as a quantitative measure of muscle mechanical output. Med Biol Eng Comput 20:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Person RS, Kudina LP (1972) Discharge frequency and discharge pattern of human motor units during voluntary contraction of muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 32:471–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Riek S, Bawa P (1992) Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors. J Neurophysiol 68:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax A, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM, Tempel CMM van den (1989) Differences in the activation of m. biceps brachii in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions Exp Brain Res 76:55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax AAM, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM, Kleyne M (1990a) Differences in central control of m. biceps brachii in movement tasks and force tasks. Exp Brain Res 79:138–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax AAM, Denier van der Gon JJ, Erkelens CJ (1990b) Differences in coordination of elbow flexor muscles in force tasks and in movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 81:567–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac FE (1990) Coupling of recruitment order to the force produced by motor units: the “size principle hypothesis” revisited. In: Binder, Mendell (eds) The orderly recruitment of motor units. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 96–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuylen EJ van, Gielen CCAM, Denier van der Gon JJ (1988) Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. J Neurophysiol 60:1523–1548

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theeuwen, M., Gielen, C.C.A.M., Miller, L.E. et al. The relation between the direction dependence of electromyographic amplitude and motor unit recruitment thresholds during isometric contractions. Exp Brain Res 98, 488–500 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233986

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233986

Key words

Navigation