Abstract
When restraining a mechanically “active” object (one that exerts unpredictable changes in loading forces) with a precision grip of the digits, we maintain a stable grasp by modulating our grip force using somatosensory information related to the loading forces. The response to ramp load increases consists of an initial fast rise in grip force (“catch-up”) followed by a secondary response that steadily increases the grip force in parallel with the load force (“tracking”). The sizes of these response components scale in proportion to the loading rate. However, maintaining a stable grasp without employing an exceedingly large grip force may require further scaling of this load to grip sensorimotor transformation based on two additional factors: (1) the friction at the digit-object interface and (2) the grip force present at the start of the load increase. The present experiments sought to determine whether such scaling occurs and to characterize its control. Subjects restrained a manipulandum held between the tips of the thumb and index finger. At unpredictable times a pulling force appeared, directed away from the subject's hand. Each pull had a trapezoidal load profile beginning and ending at 0 N with 4-N/s ramps; each ramp was 1 s in duration. The texture of the gripped surfaces varied among sandpaper, suede, and rayon, which represented increasingly slippery surfaces. The grip force at the start of the load ramp (intertrial grip force), and the amplitudes of the catch up and secondary grip responses scaled in proportion to the inverse friction. We interpret these results to indicate a uniform scaling of the transformations controlling the intertrial grip force, the catch up response, and the secondary response. Initial state information from tactile cues available upon object contact appeared to update the frictional scaling value. This conclusion is based on observations of immediate changes in the intertriai grip force upon contact with a new surface, and because differences in force-rate profiles appeared virtually by the onset of the catch-up response. Similarly, the intertriai grip force also constituted initial state information. The size of the catch-up and secondary grip force responses varied inversely with the size of the intertrial grip force. These scalings of the load to grip force sensorimotor transformation for friction and intertrial grip force level appear to be functionally adaptive, because they contribute to a stable grasp (prevent object slips) while avoiding exceedingly large safety margins.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker W, Jürgens R (1979) An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Res 19:967–983
Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1988) Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of a grasped object. J Neurophysiol 60:1513–1522
Cordo PJ (1987) Mechanisms controlling accurate changes in elbow torque in humans. J Neurosci 7:432–442
Deubel PJ, Wolf W, Hauske G (1986) Adaptive gain control of saccadic eye movements. Hum Neurobiol 5:245–253
Edin BB, Westling G, Johansson RS (1992) Independent control of finger tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 450:547–564
Forssberg H, Eliasson AC, Kinoshita H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991) Development of human precision grip. I. Basic coordination of force. Exp Brain Res 85:451–457
Ghez C, Vicario D (1978) The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments. Exp Brain Res 33:191–202
Ghez C, Hening W, Gordon J (1991) Organization of voluntary movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1:664–671
Gordon J, Ghez C (1987a) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control. Exp Brain Res 67:241–252
Gordon J, Ghez C (1987b) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Exp Brain Res 67:253–269
Hening W, Favilla M, Ghez C (1988) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. V. Gradual specification of response amplitude. Exp Brain Res 71:116–128
Johansson RS (1991) How is grasping modified by somatosensory input? In: Humphrey DR, Freund H-J (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley, New York, pp 331–355
Johansson RS, Cole KJ (1992) Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2:815–823
Johansson RS, Riso R, Häger C, Bäkström L (1992a) Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude. Exp Brain Res 89:181–189
Johansson RS, Häger C, Riso R (1992b) Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. II. Changes in load force rate. Exp Brain Res 89:192–203
Johansson RS, Häger C, Bäckström L (1992c) Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. III. Impairments during digital anesthesia. Exp Brain Res 89:204–312
Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–554
Johansson RS, Westling G (1987) Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor-responses during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 66:141–154
Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Programmed and triggered action to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:72–86
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1992) Changes in pinch force with bidirectional load forces. J Mot Behav 24:157–164
Lacquaniti F, Maioli C (1987) Anticipatory and reflex coactivation of antagonist muscles in catching. Brain Res 406:373–378
Lacquaniti F, Borghese NA, Carrozzo M (1992) Internal models of limb geometry in the control of hand compliance. J Neurosci 12:1750–1762
McLaughlin SC (1967) Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophysiol 2:359–362
Nashner LM (1981) Analysis of stance posture in humans. In: Towe AL, Luschei ES (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: motor coordination. Plenum, New York, pp 527–561
Ojakangas CL, Ebner TJ (1991) Scaling of the metrics of visually guided arm movements during motor learning in primates. Exp Brain Res 85:314–323
Optican LM, Zee DS, Chu FC (1985) Adaptive response to ocular muscle weakness in human pursuit and saccadic eye movements. J Neurophysiol 54:110–122
Sonderen JF van, Gielen CCAM, Van der Gon JJD (1989) Motor programmes for goal directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location. Exp Brain Res 78:139–146
Vicario DS, Ghez C (1984) The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. IV. Updating of ongoing isometric responses. Exp Brain Res 55:134–144
Westling G, Johansson RS (1984) Factors influencing the force of control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53:277–284
Winstein CJ, Abbs JH, Petashnick D (1991) Influences of object weight and instruction on grip force adjustments. Exp Brain Res 87:465–469
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, K.J., Johansson, R.S. Friction at the digit-object interface scales the sensorimotor transformation for grip responses to pulling loads. Exp Brain Res 95, 523–532 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227146
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227146