Skip to main content
Log in

Inheritance of resistance to Meloidogyne spp. in common bean and the genetic basis of its sensitivity to temperature

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Bean lines PI 165426, PI 165435, and Alabama no. 1, possessing resistance to Meloidogyne incognita, and bean lines A315 and A445, possessing gene Me1, were tested against several Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica isolates. Resistance in bean line PI 165426, PI 165435, and Alabama no. 1 was found to be complementary to resistance conferred by gene Me1. Resistance in PI 165426 was found to be dominant and conditioned by one dominant and one recessive gene at 26 °C. We propose Me2me3 as the genotype symbol for this resistance. Resistance in lines PI 165435 and Alabama no. 1 was found to be recessive. Since Alabama no. 1 and PI 165435 were resistant at 26 °C but susceptible at 29 °C, and segregation of F2 progeny derived from crosses involving PI 165426 was 13∶3 at 26 °C and 1∶2∶1 at 28 °C, we concluded that the temperature at which transition from resistance to susceptibility occurs was determined by whether the resistance gene is dominant or recessive. Furthermore, the 1∶2∶1 segregation of F2 plants and an intermediate resistance reaction of F1 plants of crosses involving PI 165426 indicated that allelic dosage of the dominant gene also influenced the transition temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammati M, Thomason IJ, McKinney HE (1986) Retention of resistance to Meloidogyne incognita in Lycopersicon genotypes at high soil temperature. J Nematol 18:491–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrons KC (1939) Root-knot resistance in beans. J Hered 31:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton JW, Tretiak DN (1972) Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J Fish Res Bd Canada 29:1169–1172

    Google Scholar 

  • Dropkin VH (1969) The necrotic reaction of tomatoes and other hosts resistant to Meloidogyne: reversal by temperature. Phytopathology 59:1632–1637

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbenshade PR, Triantaphyllou AC (1985) Electrophoretic methods for the study of root-knot nematode enzymes. In: Barker KR, Carter CC, Sasser JN (eds) An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne, Vol. 2: Methodology. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, pp 115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassuliotis G, Deakin JR, Huffman JC (1970) Root-knot nematode resistance in snap bean: breeding and nature of resistance. J Am Hortic Sci 95:640–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin GD (1969) Effects of temperature on Meloidogyne hapla in alfalfa. Phytopathology 59:599–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman KM, Sasser JN (1985) Identification of Meloidogyne species on the basis of differential host test and perineal pattern morphology. In Barker KR, Carter CC, Sasser JN (eds) An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne, Vol. 2: Methodology. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, pp 69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann RW (1970) Inheritance of resistance to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 96:344–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey RS, Barker KR (1973) A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp. including a new technique. Plant Dis Rep 57:1020–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MR, Sheperd KW, Mayo GME (1989) Effect of genotype and temperature on the expression of L genes in flax conferring resistance to rust. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 35:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Luig NH, Rajaram S (1972) The effect of temperature and genetic background on host gene expression and interaction to Puccinia graminis tritici. Phytopathology 62:1171–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty TI, O'Malley DM, Guries RP (1984) A manual for starch gel electrophoresis. University of Wisconsin, Department of Forestry Staff Paper Series No. 20 (1984) Madison/WI

  • Mullin BA, Abawi GS, Pastor-Corrales MA (1991) Modification of resistance expression of Phaseolus vulgaris to Meloidogyne incognita by elevated soil temperatures. J Nematol 23:182–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Omwega CO, Thomason IJ, Roberts PA (1988) A nondestructive technique for screening bean germ plasm for resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Dis 72:970–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Omwega CO, Thomason IJ, Roberts PA (1990a). A single dominant gene in common bean conferring resistance to three root-knot nematode species. Phytopathology 80:745–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Omwega CO, Thomason IJ, Roberts PA (1990b) Effect of temperature on expression of resistance to Meloidogyne spp. in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Nematol 22:446–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Omwega CO, Thomason IJ, Roberts PA, Waines JG (1989) Identification of new sources of resistance to root-knot nematodes in Phaseolus. Crop Sci 29:1463–1468

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiander RK, Smith MH, Yang SY, Johnson WE, Gentry JB (1971) Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI. Univ Texas Publ 7103:49–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler JM, Hatchett JH (1983) Temperature influence on expression of resistance to Hessian fly (Diptera:Cecidomyiidae) in wheat derived from Triticum tauschii. J Econ Entomol 76:323–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden NF (1984) Distinguishing among white-seeded bean cultivars by means of allozyme genotypes. Euphytica 33:199–208

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omwega, C.O., Roberts, P.A. Inheritance of resistance to Meloidogyne spp. in common bean and the genetic basis of its sensitivity to temperature. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 83, 720–726 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226690

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226690

Key words

Navigation