Skip to main content
Log in

RFLP variation and genealogical distance, multivariate distance, heterosis, and genetic variance in oats

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patterns of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) have been proposed as estimators of genetic diversity among breeding lines and as predictors of heterosis and genetic variance. We evaluated these proposals by using a set of nine elite oat lines crossed in a diallel mating design without reciprocals. RFLP analysis was conducted using HindIII-digested DNA and a total of 107 probes from three different sources: 14 heterologous wheat cDNA clones, 17 oat genomic clones, and 76 oat cDNA clones. Of the 77 probes that produced high-quality autoradiographs, 26 detected polymorphisms among this set of lines, with an average of 2.6 variants per probe. RFLP-based genetic distance (FD) was calculated from these data by using Nei and Li's measure of genetic similarity, and was compared with two other measures of genetic divergence. Genealogical distance (GD *) was obtained from the coefficients of parentage based on known parental pedigrees, and multivariate distance (DI) was calculated by using the first five principal components of the parental correlation matrix for 12 agronomic traits. FD was significantly correlated with GD * (r=0.63, P<0.01), but not with DI (r=-0.05). Cluster analysis based on these three distance estimates did not produce equivalent groupings, but the FD and GD * clusters were more similar to each other than to the DI clusters. These results indicate that: (1) sufficient variation exists for further application of RFLP technologyto oats, (2) RFLPs could provide accurate estimates of genetic divergence among elite oat lines, and (3) it is unlikely that dispersed markers can predict heterosis or population genetic variance in oats. Further investigations will require more parental lines, a larger set of markers, and more information on the linkage relationships between RFLP markers and loci controlling the trait of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atchley WR, Newmann S, Cowley DE (1988) Genetic divergence in mandible form in relation to molecular divergence in inbred mouse strains. Genetics 120:239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1992) Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor Appl Genet 83:628–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer MG (1957) Approximate confidence limits for components of variance. Biometrika 44:159–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset A, Lefort-Buson M, Gallais A (1991) Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81:571–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen NM, Frey KJ (1987a) Relationship between genealogical distance and breeding behavior in oats (Avena sativa L.) Euphytica 36:413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen NM, Frey KJ (1987b) Relationships between three measures of genetic distance and breeding behavior in oats (Avena sativa L.) Genome 29:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox TS, Murphy JP (1990) The effect of parental divergence on F2 heterosis in winter wheat crosses. Theor Appl Genet 79:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox TS, Kiang YT, Gorman MB, Rodgers DM (1985) Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in the soybean. Crop Sci 25:529–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden D (1949) The computation of inbreeding coefficients for closed populations. J Hered 40:248–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers JCM, Dentine MR (1991) Quantitative genetic variance associated with chromosomal markers in segregating populations. Theor Appl Genet 81:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Duesing JH, Raeber JG (1989) Requirements of industrial firms for intellectual property. Votr Pflanzenzuchtg 16:253–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehoibu NG, Goddard ME, Taylor JF (1990) Prediction of heterosis in crosses between inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Theor Appl Genet 80:321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Emik LO, Terrill CE (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 40:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1983) A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132:6–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frei OM, Stuber CW, Goodman MM (1986) Use of allozymes as genetic markers for predicting performance in maize singlecross hybrids. Crop Sci 26:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Graner A, Siedler H, Jahoor A, Herrmann RG, Wenzel G (1990) Assessment of the degree and type of restriction fragment length polymorphism in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Theor Appl Genet 80:826–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidrich-Sobrinho E, Cordeiro AR (1975) Codominant isoenzymic alleles as markers of genetic diversity correlated with heterosis in maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 46:197–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Helentjaris T, King G, Slocum M, Siedenstrang C, Wegman S (1985) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms as probes for plant diversity and their development as tools for applied plant breeding. Plant Mol Biol 5:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter RB, Kannenberg LW (1971) Isozyme characterization of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and its relation to single-cross hybrid performance. Can J Genet Cytol 13:649–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquard A (1974) The genetic structure of populations. Translated by D. and B. Charlesworth. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamkey KR, Hallauer AR, Kahler AL (1987) Allelic differences at enzyme loci and hybrid performance in maize. J Hered 78:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Godshalk EB, Lamkey KR, Woodman WW (1989) Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci 29:1067–1071

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort-Buson M, Guillot-Lemoine B, Dattee Y (1986) Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Use of different indicators of genetic divergence in a 7 × 7 diallel. Agronomie 6:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE (1993) Use of RFLP markers for analysis of genetic relationships among breeding materials and prediction of hybrid performance. Int Crop Sci I (in press)

  • Melchinger AE, Lee M, Lamkey KR, Hallauer AR, Woodman WL. (1990 a) Genetic diversity for restriction fragment polymorphisms and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds. Theor Appl Genet 80:488–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE, Lee M, Lamkey KR, Woodman WL (1990b) Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms: relation to estimated genetic effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci 30:1033–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Lee M, Woodman WL, Lamkey KR (1991) Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Crop Sci 31:669–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Messmer MM, Melchinger AE, Lee M, Woodman WL, Lee EA, Lamkey KR (1991) Genetic diversity among progenitors and elite lines from the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) maize population: comparison of allozyme and RFLP data. Theor Appl Genet 83:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li W (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Marroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgenson R, Allard RA (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014–8018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1988) SAS introductory guide for personal computers. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JSC, Smith OS (1989) The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines. II. The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between lines. Maydica 34:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JSC, Smith OS, Bowen SL, Tenborg RA, Wall SJ (1991) The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize. III. A revised scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines utilizing DNA RFLPs. Maydica 36:213–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith OS, Smith JSC, Bowen SL, Tenborg RA, Wall SJ (1990) Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80:833–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith OS, Smith JSC, Bowen SL, Tenborg RA (1992) Numbers of RFLP probes necessary to show associations between lines. Maize Genet Coop Newslett 66:66

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souza E, Sorrells ME (1989) Pedigree analysis of North American oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci 29:595–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza E, Sorrells ME (1991a) Relationships among 70 North American oat germplasms. I. Cluster analysis using quantitative clusters. Crop Sci 31:599–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza E, and Sorrells ME (1991b) Relationships among 70 North American oat germplasms. II. Cluster analysis using qualitative characters. Crop Sci 31:605–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza E, and Sorrells ME (1991c) Prediction of progeny variation in oat from parental genetic relationships. Theor Appl Genet 82:233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin SK (1982) Effective population size for the soybean improvement program in maturity groups 00 to IV. Crop Sci 22:151–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW (1989) Marker-based selection for quantitative traits. Votr Pflanzenzuchtg 16:31–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. Mac Key

Journal paper No. J-15302 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA 50011, USA. Project No. 2818 and 2447. Supported by Quaker Oats grant to M. Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moser, H., Lee, M. RFLP variation and genealogical distance, multivariate distance, heterosis, and genetic variance in oats. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 87, 947–956 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225789

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225789

Key words

Navigation