Abstract
Although analogies are commonly used in instruction, little is known for whom and under what conditions they are most beneficial. This descriptive study investigated the use of analogies in the design of instructional text. Twenty-six science textbooks, ranging from elementary to post-secondary level, were analyzed for the presence of analogies. A total of 216 analogies were identified and organized into several categories which were then synthesized into a classification system. Based on these results, a set of prescriptions regarding the nature and characteristics of the vehicle and topic and their relationship, the presence and amount of grounds and limitations and the appropriate format and position for an analogy in written instruction are proposed. Recommendations for additional research are suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1969). “The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material”, Journal of Education Psychology 51 (5): 267–272.
Brown, W. K. and Olmstead, S. P. (1962). Language and Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Carroll, J. S. (1974). “The potentials and limitations of print as a medium of instruction”, in D. R.Olson (Ed.), Media and Symbols: The Forms of Expression, Communication and Education, 73rd Yearbook, Part 1. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual Methods in Teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Dryden Press.
Diack, H. (1966). Language for Teaching. New York: Philosophical Library.
Gagné, R. M. and Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Good, C. V. (Ed.) (1981). Dictionary of Education. New York: Harper and Row.
Hayes, D. A. and Tierney, R. J. (1980). Increasing Background Knowledge Through Analogy: Its Effects Upon Comprehension and Learning. Washington, D.C.: NIE, October, 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 195 953)
McKim, R. H. (1980). Experiences in Visual Thinking. Monterery, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Ortony, A. (1979). “Beyond literal similarity”, Psychological Review 86 (3): 161–179.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983a). “Meaningfulness and instruction: Relating what is being learned to what a student knows”, Instructional Science 12 (3): 197–218.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983b). “Instructional design: What is it and why is it?” in C. M.Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reigeluth, C. M. and Stein, F. (1983). “The elaboration theory of instruction”, in C. M.Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rigney, J. W. (1978). “Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective”, in H. F.O'NeilJr. (Ed.), Learning Strategies. New York: Academic Press.
Snow, R. E. (1971). “Theory construction for research on teaching”, in R. M. W.Travers (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Verbrugge, R. R. and McCarrell, N. S. (1977). “Metaphoric comprehension: Studies in reminding and resembling”, Cognitive Psychology 9: 494–533.
Bibliography of Textbooks Studied
American Institute of Biological Sciences. Biological Science: An Inquiry into Life. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1963.
Baker, P. S. et al. Chemistry and You. Chicago: Lyons and Carnahan, Inc., 1966.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. Biological Science: Molecules to man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1963.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. Biological Science: An Ecological Approach. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1973.
Bolton, R. P. et al. Action Chemistry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1973.
Branley, R. M., Pelia, M. O. and Urban, J. Science Horizons: The World of Life. Boston: Ginnand Company, 1965.
Brown, W. R. and Anderson, N. D. Physical Science: A Search for Understanding. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1972.
Brown, W. R. and Anderson, N. D. Physical Science: A Search for Understanding. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1977.
Carter, J. L. et al. Life Science: A Problem-Solving Approach. Boston: Ginn and Company, 1971.
Daley, R. B., Higham, W. J. and Matthias, G. F. Earth Science: A Study of a Changing Planet. Fairfield, NJ: Cebco Standard Publishing, 1976.
Flint, R. F. and Skinner, B. J. Physical Geology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1974.
Jackson, W. J., Lauby, C. J. and Konicek, R. D. Inquiring into Science. New York: American Book Company, 1965.
Mallinson, G. G. et al. Science: Understanding Your Environment. (4th grade ed.). Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett Company, 1978.
Mallinson, G. G. et al. Science: Understanding Your Environment. (5th grade ed.). Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett Company, 1978.
O'Connor, P. R. et al. Chemistry Experiments and Principles. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company, 1968.
Physical Science Study Committee. Physics. (2nd ed.). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1965.
Ramsey, W. L. et al. Life Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1978.
Rockcastle, V. N., Salamon, F. R. and Schmidt, V. E.. Elementary School Science. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1972.
Schneider, H. and Schneider, N. Science for Here and Now. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company, 1973.
Schneider, H. and Schneider, N. Science in Your Life. (3rd ed.). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1968.
Smallwood, W. L. and Green, E. R. Biology. Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett Company, 1977.
Smith, E. T. and Lawrence, T. G. Exploring Biology. (6th ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1966.
Thurber, W. A., Kilburn, R. E. and Howell, P. S. Exploring Earth Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1976.
Turner, A. M. and Sears, C. T.Jr. Inquiries in Chemistry. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc., 1974.
Weisz, P. B. The Science of Biology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1963.
Welch, C. A. et al. Biological Science: Molecules to Man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Curtis, R.V., Reigeluth, C.M. The use of analogies in written text. Instr Sci 13, 99–117 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052380
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052380