Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anatomical landmark image registration: Validation and comparison

  • Validation of Registration Techniques
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CVRMed-MRCAS'97 (CVRMed 1997, MRCAS 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1205))

Abstract

This paper describes a validation approach for (interactive) anatomical landmark registration of CT and MR images. Eleven MR-CT image pairs were used, four of which had been scanned with a Leksell stereotactic frame present. Four observers each selected twelve pairs of anatomical landmarks per image pair. The images were then registered using a least squares minimization technique, only taking six transformation parameters (translation and rotation) into account. Each observer processed all twelve image pairs five times. Secondly we describe an algorithm to automatically detect a Leksell stereotactic frame from CT and MR images, scanned according to Leksell protocol. Results have been assessed by examining observer variations in the six parameters. Observer performance is differentiated by comparing median distances (and mean deviations) of identical points in different registrations. Comparison of all results show that intra- and interobserver variations are of the same magnitude as the difference between the automatic frame registration and the average observer registration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buurman J, Bar LJM, de Bliek HLT, van Eeuwijk AHW, Gerritsen FA. Versatile tools for fusion of anatomical and functional images to improve neuroradiological diagnosis and neurosurgery planning in complex cases. Proceedings ECR '95; 1995 suppl. vol 5:s175.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang H, Robb RA and Holton KS. A New Approach to 3-D Registration of Multimodality Medical Images by Surface Matching. Visualization in Biomedical Computing 1992; SPIE proc vol 1808:196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Gleeson MJ et al. Accurate frameless registration of MR and CT images of the head: applications in surgery and radio therapy planning. Radiology 1994; 191:447–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Crossman JE. Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features. British Journal of Radiology 1991; 64:1030–1035.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maurer Jr. CR, Fitzpatrick JM, A Review of Medical Image Registration. In: Maciunas RJ, ed., Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery, American Association of Neuorological Surgeons, Park Ridge, IL, 1993; 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. van den Elsen PA, Pol E-JD, Viergever MA. Medical image matching — A review with classification. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology March 1993; 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown LG. A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 1992;24(4):325–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schonemann P, A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika 1966; 31:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hemler PF, van den Elsen PA, Sumanaweera TS, Napel S, Drace J and Adler JR. A quantitative comparison of residual error for three different multimodality registration techniques. In: Y. Bizais et al. eds. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 1995; 2551–262.

    Google Scholar 

  10. West J, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques. Medical Imaging 1996: Image Processing 1996; SPIE Proc vol 2710:332–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maciunas RJ, Galloway Jr. RL, Latimer JW. The Application Accuracy of Stereotactic Frames. Neurosurgery 1994;35(4):682–695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans AC, Marrett S, Torrescorzo J, Ku S, and Collins L. MRI-PET Correlation in Three Dimensions Using a Volume-of-Interest (VOI) Atlas. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1991;11:A69–A78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arun KS, Huang TS, and Blosten SD. Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1987; 9(5):698–700.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faugeras OD and Hebert M. The Representation, Recognition, and Positioning of 3-D Shapes from Range Data. In: Rosenfeld A ed. Techniques for 3-D Machine Perception, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1986; 13–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn MH, COVIRA: Computer Vision in Radiology. Final report AIM Project A2003, Advanced informatics in Medicine, DGXIII, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen DS, Lustgarten JH, Miller E, Khandji AG, and Goodman RR. Effects of coregistration of MR to CT images on MR stereotactic accuracy. Journal of Neurosurgery 1995; 82:772–779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Golfinos JG, Fitzpatrick BC, Smith LR and Spetzler RF. Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery 1995; 83:197–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leksell stereotactic frame user manual, product nr: A0265-02, Elekta Instrument.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands

    Karel C. Strasters & Johannes Buurman

  2. Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, UK

    John A. Little, Derek L. G. Hill & David J. Hawkes

Authors
  1. Karel C. Strasters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John A. Little
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johannes Buurman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Derek L. G. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David J. Hawkes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Jocelyne Troccaz Eric Grimson Ralph Mösges

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Strasters, K.C., Little, J.A., Buurman, J., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J. (1997). Anatomical landmark image registration: Validation and comparison. In: Troccaz, J., Grimson, E., Mösges, R. (eds) CVRMed-MRCAS'97. CVRMed MRCAS 1997 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029235

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029235

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62734-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68499-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation