Skip to main content
Log in

WIND Nominal Mission Performance and Extended Mission Design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On November 1, 1994, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration launched the Interplanetary Physics Laboratory, or WIND spacecraft, as part of the Global Geospace Science program on a three-year mission to monitor the solar wind upstream of the Earth. The baseline mission design included a two-year dayside double lunar swingby orbit, followed by one year in a small-amplitude halo orbit at the Sun-Earth interior libration point, L1. During operations, the double lunar swingby phase was expanded to three years. Execution of WIND’s seventeenth successful lunar flyby in October 1997, sending the spacecraft into an eight-month “halo orbit” loop of the double lunar swingby, marked the completion of the nominal mission phase and the inauguration of the extended mission. The extended mission design, which continues to evolve, has comprised various orbital phases and concepts, including the backflip, nightside double lunar swingby, deep-tail excursion, lunar orbit, high-inclination “petal” orbit, and Earth return trajectory, in the pursuit of new science objectives. This paper provides an overview of the original mission design and describes the evolution of both nominal and extended mission phases during WIND’s operational lifetime. The powerful mission design techniques that allowed accomplishment of a successful mission are discussed. Some of these techniques were first validated during flight of the International Sun Earth Explorer-3 (ISEE-3), while others constitute a novel approach to mission design implementation. Finally, WIND’s performance is summarized from both mission design and science perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FARQUHAR and DUNHAM “A New Trajectory Concept for Exploring the Earth’s Geomagnetic Tail,” Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 4, No. 2, March–April 1981, pp. 192–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ACUNA et al. “The Global Geospace Science Program and Its Investigation,” The Global Geospace Mission, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, pp. 5–21.

  3. ACUNA et al. “ISTP-GGS/SOLARMAX,” NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 695, May 1997.

  4. HARTEN and CLARK “The Design Features of the GGS Wind and Polar Spacecraft,” The Global Geospace Mission, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, pp. 23–40.

  5. ENGEL et al. “Launch Window Expansion and Trajectory Correction Strategies Prior to the First Lunar Swingby,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 69, 1989, pp. 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  6. DUNHAM et al. “Double-Lunar Swingby Trajectories for the Spacecraft of the International Solar Terrestrial Physics Program,” AAS Paper 89-167.

  7. SHARER, FRANZ, and FOLTA “WIND Trajectory Design and Control,” CNES International Symposium on Space Dynamics, Toulouse, France, June 19–23, 1995.

  8. FARQUHAR “The Control and Use of Libration-Point Satellites,” NASA TR R-346, September 1970.

  9. PERNICKA and HOWELL “Numerical Determination of Libration Point Trajectories with Out-of-Plane Maneuvers to Avoid the Solar Exclusion Zone,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 69, 1989, pp. 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  10. SHARER and FOLTA “WIND Extended Mission Design,” AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, San Diego, California, July 29–31, 1996.

  11. SHARER and HARRINGTON “Trajectory Optimization for the ACE Halo Orbit Mission,” AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, San Diego, California, July 29–31, 1996.

  12. UPHOFF “The Art and Science of Lunar Gravity Assist,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 69, 1989, pp. 333–374.

    Google Scholar 

  13. UESUGI “Space Odyssey of an Angel—Summary of the Hiten’s Three Year Mission,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 84, 1993, pp. 607–621.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SHARER and ZSOLDOS “Control of Libration Point Orbits Using Lunar Gravity-Assisted Transfers,” Spaceflight Dynamics, Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 84, 1993, pp. 651–663.

    Google Scholar 

  15. OCAMPO and ROSBOROUGH “Transfer Trajectories for Distant Retrograde Orbiters of the Earth,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 84, 1993, pp. 1323–1333.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MUHONEN, DAVIS, and DUNHAM “Alternative Gravity-Assist Sequences for the ISEE-3 Escape Trajectory,” AIAA Paper No. 84-1977, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Seattle, Washington, 1984.

  17. FARQUHAR, DUNHAM, and HSU “Orbital Acrobatics in the Sun-Earth-Moon System,” Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Spacecraft Flight Dynamics, Darmstadt, October 1986 (ESA SP-255 December 1986).

  18. FRANZ “WIND Lunar Backflip and Distant Prograde Orbit Implementation,” AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Santa Barbara, California, February 11–15, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Franz.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, August 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franz, H., Sharer, P., Ogilvie, K. et al. WIND Nominal Mission Performance and Extended Mission Design. J of Astronaut Sci 49, 145–167 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546341

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546341

Navigation