Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On books

The Tangled Tale of Genes and Environment: Moore’s The Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of “Nature vs. Nurture”

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nature—nurture views that smack of genetic determinism remain prevalent. Yet, the increasing knowledge base shows ever more clearly that environmental factors and genes form a fully interactional system at all levels. Moore’s book covers the major topics of discovery and dispute, including behavior genetics and the twin studies, developmental psychobiology, and developmental systems theory. Knowledge of this larger life-sciences context for behavior principles will become increasingly important as the full complexity of gene—environment relations is revealed. Behavior analysis both contributes to and gains from the larger battle for the recognition of how nature and nurture really work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avital, E., & Jablonka, E. (2000). Animal traditions: Behavioural inheritance in evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beisson, J., & Sonneborn, T. M. (1965). Cytoplasmic inheritance of the organization of the cell cortex in Paramecium aurelia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 53, 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, C. M. (1990). Intergenerational transmission of maternal rejection rates among free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 39, 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1995). How heritability misleads about race. Cognition, 56, 99–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, M. S. (2005). Basic instinct: The genesis of behavior. New York: Thunder’s Mouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. B., Sutcliffe, J. S., Ebert, P. J., Militerni, R., Bravaccio, C., Trillo, S., et al. (2006). A genetic variant that disrupts MET transcription is associated with autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 16834–16839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, P. N., & Masia, C. L. (1997). Vicarious learning revisited: A contemporary behavior analytic interpretation. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 41–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cierpial, M. A., & McCarty, R. (1987). Hypertension in SHR rats: Contribution of maternal environment. American Journal of Physiology, 253, 980–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cierpial, M. A., Murphy, C. A., & McCarty, R. (1990). Maternal behavior of spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto normotensive rats: Effects of reciprocal crossfostering of litters. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 54, 90–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. M., Bone, S., & Galef, B. G. (1989). Uterine positions and schedules of urination: Correlates of differential maternal anogenital stimulation. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. M., Karpluk, P., & Galef, B. G. (1993). Hormonally mediated inheritance of acquired characteristics in Mongolian gerbils. Nature, 364, 712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, C., & Dudek, B. C. (1999). Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions with laboratory environment. Science, 284, 1670–1672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. M. (2004). Heredity and heritability. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved October 5, 2006, from http://plato.stanford.edu// archives/fall2004/entries/heredity

  • Fairbanks, L. A. (1996). Individual differences in maternal style: Causes and consequences for mothers and offspring. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 25, 579–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S. L. (1981). Identical twins reared apart: A reanalysis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Paz, M. F., Ropero, S., Setien, F., Ballestar, M. L., et al. (2005). Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 10604–10609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. D., Diorio, J., Plotsky, P. M., & Meaney, M. J. (2002). Environmental enrichment reverses the effects of maternal separation on stress reactivity. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 7840–7843.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. D., Szegda, K., Campbell, G., Martin, W. D., & Insel, T. R. (2003). Epigenetic sources of behavioral differences in mice. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 445–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, H. L. (1988). The Milwaukee Project: Preventing mental retardation in children at risk. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature-nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. D. (2001). Selfish genes or developmental systems? In R. Singh, K. Krimbas, D. Paul, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Thinking about evolution: Historical, philosophical and political perspectives: Festschrift for Richard Lewontin (pp. 184–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. H. (1961). Black like me. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzmann, N. A. (2002). Genetics and social class. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (1995). Epigenetic inheritance and evolution Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, E. J., & Fisher, C. (1980). Tooth induction in chick epithelium: Expression of quiescent genes for enamel synthesis. Science, 207, 993–995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Layzer, D. (1974). Heritability analyses of IQ scores: Science or numerology? Science, 183, 1259–1266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003). Developmental dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 819–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Man, L. X., & Chang, B. (2006). Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of having a child with a congenital digital anomaly. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 117, 301–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manuck, S. B., Flory, J. D., Ferrell, R. E., & Muldoon, M. F. (2004). Socio-economic status covaries with central nervous system serotonergic responsivity as a function of allelic variation in the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 651–668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayeux, R. (2005). Mapping the new frontier: Complex genetic disorders. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 115, 1404–1407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. (1997). Shapes of time. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, B. D., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Nature = f (nurture): A review of Oyama’s The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (1982). Maternal behavior of rats is affected by hormonal condition of pups. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 96, 123–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (1995). Maternal contributions to mammalian reproductive development and the divergence of males and females. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 24, 47–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (2003). Evolution, development, and the individual acquisition of traits: What we’ve learned since Baldwin. In B. H. Weber & D. J. Depew (Eds.), Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered (pp. 115–139). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., Wong, L., Daum, M. C., & Leclair, O. J. (1997). Mother-infant interactions in two strains of rats: Implications for dissociating mechanism and function of a maternal pattern. Developmental Psychobiology, 30, 301–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (2001). The dependent gene: The fallacy of “nature vs. nurture.” New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C., Xiang, F., Monaghan, J., Han, D., Zhang, Z., Edstroom, L., et al. (2001). Huntington disease phenocopy is a familial prion disease. American Journal of Human Genetics, 69, 1385–1388.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morange, M. (2001). The misunderstood gene(M. Cobb, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. K., Lazo, J. F., & Smith, N. G. (2004). Whether, when, and why Skinner published on biological participation in behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 153–169.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution(2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (Eds.). (2001). Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavelka, J., & Koudelova, J. (2001). Inheritance of a temperature-modified phenotype of the short antennae (sa) mutation in a moth, Ephestia kuehniella. Journal of Heredity, 92, 234–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ressler, R. H. (1966). Inherited environmental influences on the operant behavior of mice. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 61, 264–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald, A., Happe, F., Bolton, P., Butcher, L. M., Price, T. S., Wheelwright, S., et al. (2006). Genetic heterogeneity between the three components of the autism spectrum: A twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 691–699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. M. (2003). Evolution, behavior principles, and developmental systems: A review of Gottlieb’s Synthesizing Nature-Nurture: Prenatal Roots of Instinctive Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriver, C. R., & Waters, P. J. (1999). Monogenic traits are not simple: Lessons from phenylketonuria. Trends in Genetics, 15, 267–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, N. E., & Molina, J. C. (2005). Fetal or infantile exposure to ethanol promotes ethanol ingestion in adolescence and adulthood: A theoretical review. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 909–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, S. J. (1999). Attachment in rhesus monkeys. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 181–197). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, S. J. (2002). How gene-environment interactions can shape the development of socioemotional regulation in rhesus monkeys. In B. S. Zuckerman, A. F. Zuckerman, & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Emotional regulation and developmental health: Infancy and early childhood (pp. 5–26). New Brunswick, NJ: Johnson & Johnson Pediatric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, S. J. (2003). Gene-environment interactions and the neurobiology of social conflict. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008, 132–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Case studies in the great power of steady misrepresentation. American Psychologist, 47, 1441–1453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, 33199, USA

    Susan M. Schneider

Authors
  1. Susan M. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan M. Schneider.

Additional information

I thank Robert Lickliter, Edward K. Morris, Hayne W. Reese, and Ken R. Schneider for their helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, S.M. On books. BEHAV ANALYST 30, 91–105 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392149

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392149

Key words

Search

Navigation