Skip to main content
Log in

The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Does the New Name Mean New Therapies?

  • Review Article
  • Disease Treatment Review
  • Published:
Clinical Immunotherapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A new term, the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), has been coined to describe a pathophysiological state that occurs secondary to infectious and noninfectious states such as burns and trauma. When SIRS is secondary to infection, it is called sepsis. In SIRS the host response produces the inflammatory reaction to the inciting agent.

The SIRS can produce conditions that progress through stages of severity, including hypotension, to multiorgan failure. Because multiorgan failure is characterised by numerous definitions that imply extreme organ damage, the term multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) should be used to denote abnormal organ function for all grades of severity.

The pathogenesis of SIRS and MODS involves multiple mediators, including cytokines released from mononuclear phagocytes. The lipopolysaccharide-cytokine score relates the levels of several such mediators to mortality.

Management of SIRS includes supportive therapy, antibacterials when appropriate, and the treatment of the inflammatory response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest 1992; 101: 1644–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 864–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bone RC. The pathogenesis of sepsis. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 457–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bone RC. Gram-negative sepsis: background, clinical features, and intervention. Chest 1991; 101: 802–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suffredini AF, Fromm RE, Parker MM, et al. The cardiovascular response of normal humans to the administration of endotoxin. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 280–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolff SM. Biologic effects of bacterial endotoxins in man. J Infect Dis 1973; 128 (Suppl): 251–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Casey LC, Balk RA, Bone RC. Plasma cytokine and endotoxin levels correlate with survival in patients with the sepsis syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 771–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nies AS, Forsyth RP, Williams HE, et al. Contribution of kinins to endotoxin shock in unanesthetized rhesus monkeys. Circ Res 1968; 22: 155–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Young LS. Gram-negative sepsis. In: Mandell GL, Douglas RG Jr, Bennett JE, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 611–36

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kreger BE, Craven DE, McCabe WR. Gram-negative bacteremia. IV. Re-evaluation of clinical features and treatment in 612 patients. Am J Med 1980; 68: 344–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Treadwell TL. Gram-negative bacteremia: the current setting. Hosp Pract 1988; July: 117–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Antimicrobial Therapy Project Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Combination of amikacin and carbenicillin with or without cefazolin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. J Clin Oncol 1983; 1: 597–603

    Google Scholar 

  14. Packman MI, Rackow C. Optimum left heart filling pressure during fluid resuscitation of patients with hypovolemic and septic shock. Crit Care Med 1983; 11: 165–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. The Veterans Administration Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study Group. Effect of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy on mortality in patients with clinical signs of systemic sepsis. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 659–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sprung CL, Caralis PV, Marcial EH, et al. The effects of high-dose corticosteroids in patients with septic shock: a prospective, controlled study. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1137–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schumer W. Steroids in the treatment of clinical septic shock. Ann Surg 1976; 184: 333–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rackow EC, Astiz ME. Pathophysiology and treatment of septic shock. JAMA 1991; 266: 548–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenman RL, Schein RMH, Martin MA, et al. (the XOMA Sepsis Study Group). A controlled clinical trial of E5 murine monoclonal IgM antibody to endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis. JAMA 1991; 266: 1097–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziegler EJ, Fisher CJ, Sprung CL, et al. Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with a HA-1A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 429–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bone RC. Monoclonal antibodies to endotoxin: new allies against sepsis? JAMA 1991; 266: 1125–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgartner JD. Antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies in sepsis: lessons from recent clinical trials. Clin Immunother 1994; 1: 8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bone, R.C. The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Clin. Immunother. 1, 369–377 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03258514

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03258514

Keywords

Navigation