Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of the Systemic Inflammatory Response as a Biomarker in Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Cancer

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) has entered a new paradigm since the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib (Nexavar®) and sunitinib (Sutent®). Despite these advances, immunotherapy, the traditional mainstay of treatment, is not yet obsolete. Immunotherapy offers the possibility of a complete response for a small number of patients with favorable disease factors. However, immunotherapy is a toxic treatment, with a significant impact on quality of life in comparison with a relatively modest survival advantage for most. As such, the search for a biomarker to select patients for immunotherapy and to monitor their progress still remains a clinical and research goal for those involved in treating patients with metastatic renal cancer.

At present, performance status and a number of prognostic scores incorporating performance status and laboratory variables are the most widely used indicators of suitability for immunotherapy. More recently, the histological expression of carbonic anhydrase IX has been reported as a biomarker of response to interleukin (IL)-2 immunotherapy.

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase protein synthesized as part of the systemic inflammatory response. It is readily measured by standardized assays and is reliable, without variability for age, sex, or bodyweight. The presence of an elevated CRP is a prognostic indicator in a number of solid tumors, both in localized and metastatic disease. In advanced renal cancer, the Glasgow Prognostic Score, which is based on elevated CRP and low albumin, has shown prognostic value. CRP is also superior to the widely used performance status in predicting survival for patients treated with either interferon (IFN)-α or IL-2. As such, CRP is an increasingly exciting biomarker for predicting outcomes in immunotherapy. Currently, no other biomarker has been applicable for use in both IFNα and IL-2 immunotherapy. More recently, changes in CRP kinetics have shown promise as a predictive tool, although more research is required. Use of CRP as a biomarker can improve stratification of patients with metastatic renal cancer, allowing the patients less likely to benefit from immunotherapy to avoid a potentially toxic treatment. The ongoing selection of patients based on biomarkers should enable continued research on the optimum dose and timing of immunotherapy while managing toxicity and optimizing outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dorr RT. Interferon-α in malignant and viral disease. Drugs 1993; 45(2): 177–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Steineck G, Strander H, Carbin BE, et al. Recombinant leukocyte interferon alpha-2a and medroxyprogesterone in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a randomized trial. Acta Oncol 1990; 29(2): 155–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kreigmair M, Oberneder R, Hofstetter A. Interferon alfa and vinblastine versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1995; 45(5): 758–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pyrhonen S, Salminen E, Ruutu M, et al. Prospective randomized trial of interferon alfa-2a plus vinblastine versus vinblastine alone in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(9): 2859–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Medical Research Council Renal Cancer Collaborators. Interferon-α and survival in metastatic renal carcinoma: early results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 14–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coppin A, Porzolt F, Awa A, et al. Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (1): CD001425

  7. Mickisch GHJ, Garin A, van Poppel H, et al. Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 358(9286): 966–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA, et al. Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345(23): 1655–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fyfe G, Fisher RI, Rosenberg SA, et al. Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who receive high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 688–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang JC, Sherry RM, Steinberg SM, et al. Randomized study of high-dose and low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003 Aug 15; 21(16): 3127–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McDermott DF, Regan MM, Clark JI, et al. Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(1): 133–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elson PJ, Witte RS, Trump DL. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 7310–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 69: 89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 649–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Baik J, et al. Survival and prognostic stratification of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2530–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Negrier S, Escudier B, Gomez F, et al. Prognostic factors of survival and rapid progression in 782 patients with metastatic renal carcinomas treated by cytokines: a report from the Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 1460–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ando M, Ando Y, Hasegawa Y, et al. Prognostic value of performance status assessed by patients themselves, nurses, and oncologists in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 1634–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bui MHT, Seligson D, Han K, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 802–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Atkins M, Regan M, McDermott D, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of interleukin 2 therapy for renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11(10): 3714–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shuch B, Li Z, Belldegrun AS. Carbonic anhydrase IX and renal cell carcinoma: prognosis, response to systemic therapy, and future vaccine strategies. BJU Int 2008; 101Suppl. 4: 25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(6): 448–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Black S, Kushner I, Samols D. C-reactive protein. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(47): 48487–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Crumley AB, McMillan DC, McKernan M, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer 2006; 94(5): 637–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Leitch EF, Chakrabarti M, Crozier JE, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2007; 97(9): 1266–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Glen P, Jamieson NB, McMillan DC, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2006; 6(5): 450–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 90(9): 1704–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Al Murri AM, Bartlett JM, Canney PA, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2006; 94(2): 227–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer 2007; 109(2): 205–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bromwich E, McMillan DC, Lamb GW, et al. The systemic inflammatory response, performance status and survival in patients undergoing alpha-interferon treatment for advanced renal cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 91(7): 1236–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Casamassima A, Picciariello M, Quaranta M, et al. C-reactive protein: a biomarker of survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with subcutaneous interleukin-2 based immunotherapy. J Urol 2005; 173(1): 52–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miyake H, Kurahashi T, Takenaka A, et al. Clinical outcome of combined immunotherapy with interferon-alpha and low-dose interleukine-2 for Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. Epub 2008 Sep23

  32. Tatokoro M, Saito K, Iimura Y, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative C-reactive protein level in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy. J Urol 2008; 180(2): 515–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramsey S, Aitchison M, Graham J, et al. The longitudinal relationship between the systemic inflammatory response, circulating T-lymphocytes, interleukin-6 and -10 in patients undergoing immunotherapy for metastatic renal cancer. BJU Int 2008; 102(1): 125–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Saito K, Tatokoro M, Fujii Y, et al. Impact of C-reactive protein kinetics on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. Epub 2008 Oct 14

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Ramsey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsey, S. The Role of the Systemic Inflammatory Response as a Biomarker in Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Cancer. Mol Diag Ther 13, 277–281 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256333

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256333

Keywords

Navigation