Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Australian primary standards of air kerma and absorbed dose are realized in60Co gamma rays. To calibrate the megavoltage photon beams from linear accelerators, radiotherapy centres have their ionization chamber calibrated in a60Co beam and then use a protocol to transfer this calibration to the higher energy. The radiotherapy community is in the process of changing from the ACPSEM Protocol (Second Edition 1998) based on an air kerma calibration to the IAEA’s TRS-398 Code of Practice, based on an absorbed dose to water calibration. To evaluate the shift in absorbed dose resulting from the new protocol, the absorbed dose should be determined using both protocols and compared. We present a formula for this shift which can be used to check the result. To use this formula the centre needs to measure a displacement correction and know the ratio of the air kerma to absorbed dose to water calibration factors at60Co. We calculate the change they should expect by using the average ratio of the air kerma and absorbed dose to water calibration factors for NE2571 and NE2561 chambers, based on Australian standards, and by estimating the displacement correction from published depth dose data. We find the absorbed dose in a megavoltage photon beam to increase by between 0.1 and 0.6% for NE2571 chambers and between 0.7 and 1.1% for NE2561 chambers, for beams up to 35 MV. The dose measured using TRS-398 is always higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine,Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams: an adaptation of the IAEA international codes of practice, 2nd Edition, Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, 1998.

  2. International Atomic Energy Agency,Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams — An International Code of Practice, 2nd Edition, IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 277, IAEA, Vienna, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Atomic Energy Agency,The Use of Plane Parallel Ionization Chambers in High Energy Electron and Photon Beams, IAEA Technical Report Series No. 381, IAEA, Vienna, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andreo, P., Burns, D. T., Hohlfeld, K., Huq, M. S., Kanai, T., Laitano, F., Smyth, V. and Vynckier, S.,Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, IAEA Technical Report Series No. 398, IAEA, Vienna, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andreo, P., Huq, M. S., Westermark, M., Song, H., Tilikidis, A., DeWerd, L., and Shortt, K.,Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international Codes of Practice, Phys. Med. Biol., 47:3033–3053, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Palmans, H., Nafaa, L., De, J. J., Gillis, S., Hoornaert, M. T., Martens, C., Piessens, M., Thierens, H., Van der Plaetsen, A. and Vynckier, S.,Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study, Phys. Med. Biol., 47(3):421–440, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huq, M. S. and Andreo, P.,Advances in the determination of absorbed dose to water in clinical high-energy photon and electron beams using ionization chambers, Phys. Med. Biol., 49:R49-R104, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huntley, R.,The use of 60 Co calibration factors in megavoltage radiotherapy dosimetry, 1st Edition, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Fact Sheet, August 2001, http://www.arpansa.gov.au/cobalt.htm

  9. Jordan, T. J.,Megavoltage X-ray Beams: 2–50 MV, Br. J. Radiol., Suppl. 25, pp 62–109, 1996.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson, K. A., Mattsson, L.O., Lindborg, L., and Svensson, H.,Absorbed dose determination with ionization chambers in electron and photon beams having energies between 1 and 50 MeV, Proceedings National and International Standardization of Radiation Dosimetry, 2, IAEA Vienna, pp 243–270, 1978.

  11. Shortt, K., Shobe, J. and Domen, S.,Comparison of dosimetry calibration factors at the NRCC and the NIST, Med. Phys., 27:1644–1654, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Palmans, H., Nafaa, L., de Patoul, N., Denis, J-.M., Tomsej, M. and Vynckier, S.,A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies, Phys. Med. Biol., 48:1091–1107, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, 619 Lower Plenty Road, 3085, Yallambie, Victoria, Australia

    D. J. Butler & D. V. Webb

  2. Radiation Dosimetry Team, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK

    H. Palmans

Authors
  1. D. J. Butler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Palmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. V. Webb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Butler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, D.J., Palmans, H. & Webb, D.V. Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 28, 159 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178709

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178709

Key words

Search

Navigation