Abstract
Bone density measurement by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) commonly uses an external reference phantom to decrease scan-to-scan and scanner-to-scanner variability. However, the peripheral location of these phantoms and other phantom variables is also responsible for a measurable degradation in accuracy and precision. Due to non-uniform artifacts such as beam hardening, scatter, and volume averaging, the ideal reference phantom should be as close to the target tissue as possible. This investigation developed and tested a computer program that uses paraspinal muscle and fat tissue as internal reference standards in an effort to eliminate the need for an external phantom. Because of their proximity, these internal reference tissues can be assumed to reflect more accurately the local changes in the x-ray spectra and scatter distribution at the target tissue. A user interactive computerized histogram plotting technique enabled the derivation of reproducible CT numbers for muscle, fat, and trabecular bone. Preliminary results indicate that the use of internal reference tissues with the histogram technique may improve reproducibility of scan-to-scan measurements as well as inter-scanner precision. Reproducibility studies on 165 images with intentional region-of-interest (ROI) mispositioning of 1.5, 2.5, or 3.5 mm yielded a precision of better than 1% for normals and 1% to 2% for osteoporotic patients—a twofold improvement over the precision from similar tests using the standard technique with an external reference phantom. Such improvements in precision are essential for QCT to be clinically useful as a noninvasive modality for measurement of the very small annual changes in bone mineral density.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reinbold WD, Genant HK, Reiser UJ, et al: Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: Comparison of measurement methods. Radiology 160:469–478, 1988
Genant HK, Steiger P, Block JE, et al: Quantitative computed tomography: Update 1987. Calcif Tissue Int 41:179–186, 1987
Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians: Bone mineral densitometry. Ann Intern Med 107:932–936, 1987
Mazess RB: Bone density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: Thresholds and breakpoints. Calcif Tissue Int 41:117–118, 1987
Cann CE, Genant HK, Kolb FO, et al: Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. Bone 6:1–7, 1985
Cann CE, Genant HK: Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4:493–500, 1980
Goodsitt MM, Rosenthal DI, Reinus WR, et al: Two postprocessing CT techniques for determining the composition of trabecular bone. Invest Radiol 22:209–215, 1987
Merritt RB, Chernery SG: Quantitative CT measurements: The effect of scatter acceptance and filter characteristics on the EMI 7070. Phys Med Biol 31:55–63, 1986
McCullough EC: Factors affecting the use of quantitative information from a CT scanner. Radiology 124:99–107, 1977
Rutherford RA, Pullan BR, Isherwood I: Measurement of effective atomic number and electron density using the EMI scanner. Neuroradiology 11:15–21, 1976
Hall FM, Davis MA, Baran DJ: Bone mineral screening for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 316:212–214, 1987
Kalender WA, Klotz E, Suess C: Vertebral bone mineral analysis: An integrated approach with CT. Radiology 164:419–423, 1987
Imamura K, Masamichi F: Empirical beam hardening correction in the measurement of vertebral bone mineral content by computed tomography. Radiology 138:223–226, 1981
Meagher JM, Mote CD, Skinner HB: CT image correction for beam hardening using simulated projection data. Transactions of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Atlanta, 1988
Hemmingsson A, Jung B, Ytterbergh C: Dual energy computed tomography: Simulated monoenergetic and material-selective imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:490–499, 1986
Cann CE: Quantitative CT applications: Comparison of current scanners. Radiology 162:257–261, 1987
Goodsitt MM, Rosenthal DI: Quantitative computed tomography scanning for measurement of bone and bone marrow fat content: A comparison of single- and dual-energy techniques using a solid synthetic phantom. Invest Radiol 22:799–810, 1987
White DR: Tissue substitutes in experimental radiation physics. Med Phys 5:467–479, 1978
Glover GH, Pelc NJ: Nonlinear partial volume artifacts in x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 7:238–248, 1980
Breatnach E, Robinson PJ: Repositioning errors in measurement of vertebral attenuation values by computed tomography. Br J Radiol 56:299–305, 1983
Cann CE: Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: A review. Radiology 166:509–522, 1988
Laval-Jeantet AM, Roger B, Bouysse S, et al: Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density. Radiology 159:463–466, 1986
Mazess RB Errors in measuring trabecular bone by computed tomography due to marrow and bone composition. Calcif Tissue Int 35:148–152, 1983
Rosenthal DI, Ganott MA, Wyshak G, et al: Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement: Factors affecting precision. Invest Radiol 20:306–310, 1985
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boden, S.D., Goodenough, D.J., Stockham, C.D. et al. Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom. J Digit Imaging 2, 31–38 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168013
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168013