Skip to main content
Log in

Riparian ecosytems of semi-arid North America: Diversity and human impacts

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Riparian ecosystems in the semi-arid West of North America are diverse but have many similarities. The mountainous landscape with wide range of latitude, longitude, and elevation offers diverse opportunities for streamside vegetation. All riparian ecosystems in the region are dependent on supplemental water, usually from the shallow, valley alluvial aquifer. Western riparian ecosystems provide several ecological services. They stabilize streambanks, trap sediment, improve water quality, and help control or modulate hydrologic processes. They function as habitat for many western animal species, serving as a small mesic island or strip within an arid landscape. They also serve as recreational sites for humans. Riparian systems are controlled by interacting hydrologic and geomorphic processes. Floods may alter river channel characteristics and the extent of riparian vegetation while enhancing recruitment of riparian species and recharging the alluvial water table. Geomorphic features, such as canyons and valleys, control the size of the riparian zone, as well as depth of the water table. Driving variables may differ from north to south, especially hydrology. For example, northern riparian zones are influenced by ice scour, while southern zones often have flash floods. Riparian systems occur along spatial and temporal gradients. Along elevational gradients, riparian vegetation may change from simple deciduous forests to mixed deciduous to coniferous and possibly alpine wetlands. Differences among channel, terrace, and upland plant communities decrease with increasing clevation as moisture stress decreases. Temporal gradients occur within a location in the riparian zone as early pioneer communities such as cottonwood/willow give way to late successional communities such as mesquite or sagebrush, often a consequence of sediment accumulation. Many similarities among western riparian ecosystems exist because several dominant genera (e.g.,Populus) are common throughout the West, and many geomorphic and hydrologic processes that influence riparian establishment are similar. Western riparian ecosystems have been greatly altered by human activity. Major factors include natural resource use, urbanization, alteration of stream flows through dam construction and ground-water withdrawal, modification of biotic conditions through grazing, agriculture, and introduction of non-native species, and alteration within watersheds. Better understanding of the ecology of western riparian ecosystems will increase potential for restoration and protection of remaining areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, B.W., R.D. Ohmart, and J. Rice. 1983. Avian and vegetation community structure and their seasonal relationships in the lower Colorado River Valley. Condor 85:392–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armour, C.L., D.A. Doff, and W. Elmore. 1991. Effects of livestock grazing on riparian and stream ecosystems. Fisheries (Bethesda, MD) 16:7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auble, G.T., J.M. Friedman, and M.L. Scott. 1994. Relating riparian vegetation to present and future streamflow. Ecological Applications 4:544–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auble, G.T. and M.L. Scott. 1998. Fluvial disturbance patches and cottonwood recruitment along the upper Missouri River, Montana. Wetlands 18:546–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, K. and T. Weaver. 1994. Changes in vegetation and nutrient pools during riparian succession. Wetlands 14:98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braatne, J.H., S.B. Rood, and P.E. Heilman. 1996. Life history, ecology and conservation of riparian cottonwoods in North America. p. 57–86.In R.F. Stettler, H.D Bradshaw, Jr., P.E. Heilman, and T.M. Hinckley (eds.) Biology ofPopulus and Its Implications for Management and Conservation. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, C.E. and D.G. Smith. 1986. Plains cottonwood recruitment and survival on a prairie meandering river floodplain, Milk River, southern Alberta and northen Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:1433–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, M.K. and S. Cornelius. 1998. Opportunities for ecological improvement along the lower Colorado River and delta. Wetlands 18:513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M.M., B.L. Swift, R.C. Plantico, and J.S. Barelay. 1981. Riparian ecosystems: their ecology and status. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Services Program, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-81/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, J.H. 1984.Tamarix spp. (salt cedar), an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of western USA. p. 27–44.In L. de Wall, L. Child, P. Wade, and J. Brock (eds.) Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, D.E. and S.D. Smith. 1995. Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the southwestern United States. Ecological Monographs 65:347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C.J. and W. Green. 1968. Perpetual succession of streamchannel vegetation in a semi-arid region. Journal Arizona Academy of Sciences 5:86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, M., R.H. Webb, and J.C. Schmidt. 1996. Dams and rivers: a primer on the downstream effects of dams. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1126.

  • Cooper, J.R., J.W. Gilliam, R.B. Daniel, and W.P. Robard. 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 51:416–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, T.E. and J.R. Ehleringer. 1991. Streamside trees that do not use stream water. Nature 350:335–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominick, D.S. and M.P. O’Neill. 1998. Effects of flow augmentation on stream channel morphology and riparian vegetation: upper Arkansas River Basin, Colorado. Wetlands 18:591–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius, M. and C. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753–762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, W. 1992. Riparian responses to grazing practices. p. 442–457.In R.B. Naiman (ed.) Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B.L. 1998. Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande. Wetlands 18:658–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, J.M. 1998. Recent developments in the law affecting livestock grazing on western riparian areas. Wetlands 18:646–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenneman, N.M. 1931. Physiography of Western United States. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, P., W.W. Brady, and D.R. Patton. 1985. Effects of regulated water flows on regeneration of Fremont cottonwood. Journal of Range Management 38:135–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, L.B., J.R. Ehleringer, and T.E. Dawson. 1992. Water sources of plants growing in woodland, desert, and riparian communities: evidence from stable isotope analysis. United States Forest Service General Technical Report INT-289:43–47.

  • Freeman, C.E. and W.A. Dick-Peddie. 1970. Woody riparian vegetation in the Bluck and Sacramento Mountain ranges of southern New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 15:145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.M., W.R. Osterkamp, and W.M. Lewis, Jr. 1996. Channel narrowing and vegetation development following a Great Plains flood. Ecology 77:2167–2181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.M., W.R. Osterkamp, M.L. Scott, and G.T. Auble. 1998. Downstream effects of dams on channel geometry and bottomland vegetation: regional patterns in the Great Plains. Wetlands 18:619–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.M., M.L. Scott, and G.T. Auble. 1997. Water management and cottonwood forest dynamics along prairie streams. p. 49–71.In E. Knopf and F. Samson (eds.) Ecology and Conservation of Great Plains Vertebrates. Ecological Studies 125. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.M., M.L. Scott, and W.L. Lewis, Jr. 1995. Restoration of riparian forest using irrigation, artificial disturbance, and natural seedfall. Environmental Management 19:547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, D.N. and J.E. Roelle. 1998. Survival of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides subsp.monilifera) and salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima) seedlings in response to flooding. Wetlands 18:669–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, J.B., R.H. Webb, and R. Hereford. 1991. Relation of sediment load and floodplain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona. Geological Society of America Bulletin 103:1405–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, W.L. 1988. Fluvial Processes in Dryland Rivers. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.E. 1986. Downstream effects of timber harvest activities on the channel and valley floor morphology of western Cascade streams. Ph.D. Dissertation. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S.V., F.J. Swanson, W.A. McKee, and K.W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41: 540–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griggs, R.F. 1938. Timberlines in the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecology 19:548–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.R., C.A. Fox, and R.J. Risser. 1987. Impacts of hydroelectric development on riparian vegetation in the Sierra Nevada region, California. Environmental Management 11:519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A.R. 1996. Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. Journal Environmental Quality 25:743–755.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.T., W.S. Platts, and R.L. Beschta. 1991. Ecological and geomorphological concepts for instream and out-of-channel flow requirements. Rivers 2:198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, R.M., J.F. Walker, J.C. Day, and R. Kallio. 1990. The influence of man on hydrologic systems. p. 329–359.In M.G. Wolman and H.C. Riggs (eds.) The Geology of North America, Volume 0–1. Surface Water Hydrology. Geological Society of America. Boulder. CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W.C., B.S. Anderson, and R.D. Ohmart. 1987. Avian communtiy structure changes in a mature floodplain forest after extensive flooding. Journal Wildlife Management 51:495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupp, C.R. and W.R. Osterkamp. 1996. Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphie processes. Geomorphology 14:277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J.R. and N.E. West. 1979. Riparian tree species distribution and succession along the lower Escalante River, Utah. Southwest Naturalist 24:331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.R. 1991. Historic changes in vegetation along the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon. p. 178–206.In National Research Council, Colorado River Ecology and Management. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.R. and S.W. Carothers. 1982. Riparian habitats and recreation: interrelationships in the Southwest and Rocky Mountain region. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Eisenhower Consortium Bulletin 12:1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.C. 1992. Dams and riparian forests: case study from the upper Missouri River. Rivers 3:229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.C. 1994. Woodland expansion in the Platt River, Nebraska: patterns and causes. Ecological Monographs 64:45–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.C. 1998. Adjustment of riparian vegetation to river regulation in the Great Plains, USA. Wetlands 18:608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.C. R.L. Burgess, and W.R. Keammerer. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 64:45–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J.B. 1988. The status of riparian habitats in Pacific Northwest forests. p. 45–55.In K.J. Raedeke (ed.) Streamside Management: Riparian Wildlife and Forestry Interactions. Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Contribution 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf, G.M., R. Kattelmann, M. Embury, and D.C. Erman. 1996. Status of riparian habitat. In Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress. Center for Water Wildlands Research. University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf, G.M. and E.A. Kellen 1991. Management of urbanizing watersheds. p. 27–40.In J. DeVries and S. Conard (eds.) California Watersheds at the Urban Interface. California Water Research Center Report 75.

  • Leopold, L.B., M.G. Wolman, and J.P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, F.K., W.E. Dietrich, and W.J. Trush. 1995. Downstream ecological effects of dams, a geomorphic perspective. Bioscience 45: 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth, D.J. and D.T. Patten. 1975. Conversion of chaparral to grass in central Arizona: effects on selected ions in watershed runoff. American Midland Naturalist 93:25–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrence, R., J. Fail, Jr., O. Hendrickson, R. Leonard, Jr., and L. Rasmussen. 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. Bioscience 34:374–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.M. and S.B. Rood. 1998. Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—an integrative model. Wetlands 18:634–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, A.L. 1990. Possible effects of residential development on streamflow, riparian plant communities and fisheries in small mountain streams in central Arizona. Forest Ecological Management 33/34:351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigliano, M.F. 1998. Cottonwood and willow demography on a young island, Salmon River, Idaho. Wetlands 18:571–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R.J. and H. Decamps. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 621–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R.J., H. Decamps, M. Pollock. 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications 3:209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.L., M.L. McHenry, and W.S. Platts. 1991. Mining. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19:425–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmart, R.D., B.W. Anderson, and W.C. Hunter. 1988. The ecology of the lower Colorado River from Davis Dam to the Mexico-United States boundry: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Biological Report 85:1–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterkamp, W.R. 1998. Processes of fluvial island formation, with examples from Plum Creek, Colorado and Snake River, Idaho. Wetlands 18:530–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D.T. 1968. Dynamics of the shrub continuum along the Gallatin River in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 49:1107–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D.T. 1989. Effects of phased highway improvements, browsing and moisture stress on the riparian ecosystem along the Upper Gallatin River, Montana. p. 185.In R.E. Gresswell, B.A. Barton, and J.L. Kersher (eds.) Proceedings of a Workshop on Riparian Resource Management, 8–11 May 1989, Billings, MT. U.S. Bureau of Land Management. Billings, MT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D.T. 1993. Herbivore optimization and overcompensation, does response of western rangelands to native herbivory support these theories? Ecological Applications 3:35–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K. 1988. Forests of the Rocky Mountains. p. 61–101.In M.G. Barbour and D.W. Billings (eds.) North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N.L., J.D. Atlan, M.B. Bain, J.R. Karr, K.L. Prestgaard, B.D. Richter, R.E. Sparks, and J.C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rood, S.B., C. Hillman, T. Sanche, and J.M. Mahoney. 1994. Clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 72:1766–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rood, S.B., A.R. Kalishchuk, and J.M. Mahoney. 1998. Initial cottonwood seedling recruitment following the flood of the century of the Oldman River, Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 18:557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rood, S.B. and J.M. Mahoney. 1990. Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in western prairies: probably causes and prospects for mitigation. Environmental Management 14: 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rood, S.B. and J.M. Mahoney. 1995. River damming and riparian cottonwoods along the Marias River, Montana. Rivers 5:195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabine, B.J. (ed.). 1994. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands—Regions 4, 5, and 8. Resource Management Group, Inc., Grand Haven, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, A. and S.D. Smith. 1996. Water use byTamarix ramosissima and associated phreatophytes in a Mojave Desert floodplain. Ecological Applications 6:888–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M.L., G.T. Auble, and J.M. Friedman. 1997. Flood dependency of cottonwood establishment along the Missouri River. Montana. Ecological Applications 7:677–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M.L., J.M. Friedman, and G.T. Auble. 1996. Fluvial process and the establishment of bottomland trees. Geomorphology 14: 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M.L., P.B. Shafroth, and G.T. Auble. 1999. Responses of riparian cottonwoods to alluvial water declines. Environmental Management 23: (in press).

  • Scott, M.L., M.A. Wondzell, and G.T. Auble. 1993. Hydrograph characteristics relevant to the establishment and growth of western riparian vegetation. p. 237–246.In H.J. Morel-Seytoux (ed.) Proceedings of the thirteenth annual American Geophysical Union Hydrology Days. Hydrology Days Publications, Atherton, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafroth, P.B., G.T. Auble, and M.L. Scott. 1995. Germination and establishment of the native plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marshall subsp.monilifera) and the exotic Russian-olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.). Conservation Biology 9:1169–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafroth, P.B., G.T. Auble, J.C. Stromberg, and D.T. Patten. 1998. Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18: 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle, R.C., A.J. Pierce, and C.L. O’Loughlin. 1985. Hillslope stabillity and land use. Water Resources Monograph 11. American Geophysical Union. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. 1980. River ice processes: thresholds and geomorphic effects in northern and mountain rivers. p. 323–343.In D.R. Coats and J.D. Vitek (eds.) Thresholds in Geomorphology. Allen and Unwin, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.D., D.A. Devitt, A. Sala, J.R. Cleverly, and D.E. Busch. 1998. Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions. Wetlands 18:687–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C. 1993. Instream flow models for mixed deciduous riparian vegeetation within a semiarid region. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8:225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C. 1998. Functional equivalency of salt cedar (Tamarix chinensis) and Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) along a free-flowing river. Wetlands 18:675–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C. and M.K. Chew. 1997. Herbaceous exotics in Arizona’s riparian ecosystems. Desert Plants 13:11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C., J. Fry, and D.T. Patten. 1997. Marsh development after large floods in an alluvial, arid-land river. Wetlands 17:292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C. and D.T. Patten. 1989. Early recovery of an eastern Sierran riparian system following forty years of stream diversion. p. 399–404.In Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference, U.S. Forest Service, Berkeley, CA, USA. General Technical Report PSW-110.

  • Stromberg, J.C. and D.T. Patten. 1996. Instream flow and cottonwood growth in the eastern Sierra Nevada of California, USA. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C., D.T. Patten, and B.D. Richter. 1991. Flood flows and dynamics of Sonoran riparian forests. Rivers 2:221–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C., B.D. Richter, D.T. Patten, and W.G. Wolden. 1993a. Response of a Sonoran riparian forest to 10-year return flood. Great Basin Naturalist 53:18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C., M.R. Sommerfeld, D.T. Patten, J. Fry, C. Kramer, F. Amalfi, and C. Christian. 1993b. Release of effluent into the upper Santa Cruz River, southern Arizona: ecological considerations. p. 81–92.In M. Wallace (ed.) Proceedings of the Symposium on Effluent Use and Management. American Water Resources Association, Tucson, AZ. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C., R. Tiller, and B. Richter. 1996. Effects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: The San Pedro, Arizona. Ecological Applications 6:1133–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J.C., J.A. Tress, S.D. Wilkins, and S. Clark. 1992. Response of velvet mesquite to groundwater decline. Journal of Arid Environments 23:45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F.J., L.E. Benda, S.H. Duncan, G.E. Grant, W.F. Megahan, L.M. Reid, and R.R. Ziemer. 1987. Mass failures and other processes of sediment production in Pacific Northwest forest landscapes. p. 9–38.In E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy (eds.). Streamside Management, Forestry and Fishery Interactions. Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Contribution 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenciano, D. 1992. Elevational and cross-sectional gradients in montane riparian plant communities of sub-Mogollon Arizona: a comparison to adjacent upland communities. M.S. Thesis. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. and W.A. Neiring. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. II. A gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology 46:429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. and W.A. Neiring. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, production and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56:771–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patten, D.T. Riparian ecosytems of semi-arid North America: Diversity and human impacts. Wetlands 18, 498–512 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161668

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161668

Key Words

Navigation