Skip to main content
Log in

The origin of siphonostele in three species ofSelaginella spr.

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Conclusion

The observations recorded in the foregoing pages thus warrant the following general conclusion with regard to the origin of the amphiphloic siphonostele inSelaginella:

The origin of the siphonostele inSelaginella is correlated with the polystelic condition and the amphiphloic siphonostele originated as a result of a fusion of a number of separate steles. The polystelic condition probably originated in response to the necessity of increasing the amount of conducting and mechanical tissues in the absence of provision for secondary growth. The pith is extrastelar in origin and the presence of internal phloem and internal endodermis is directly due to the origin of the siphonostele from the polystelic condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boodle, L. A. “Comparative anatomy of the Hymenophyllaceæ, Schizæaceæ and Gleicheniaceæ. IV. Further observations on Schizæa,”Ann. Bot., 1903,17, 511.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bower, F. O. “On the primary xylem and the origin of medullation in the Ophioglossaceæ,” —, 1911,25, 537.

    Google Scholar 

  3. — “On the medullation in the Pteridophyta,” —, 1911,25, 555.

    Google Scholar 

  4. -Size and Form in Plants, 1930.

  5. Eames, A. J., and MacDaniels, L. H.An Introduction to Plant Anatomy, 1925.

  6. Gibson, R. J. H. “Contributions towards a knowledge of the anatomy of the genus Selaginella. I. The stem,”Ann. Bot., 1894,8, 133.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gwynne-Vaughan, D. T. “Some remarks on the anatomy of the Osmundaceæ,” —, 1911,25, 525.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffrey, E. C. “The morphology of the central cylinder in vascular plants,”Rep. Brit. Assocn., Toronto, 1897, 869; London, 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  9. -The Anatomy of Woody Plants, 1917, 283–91.

  10. - “The Pteropsida,”Bot. Gaz., 1910, 401.

  11. Mitchell, G. “Contribution towards a knowledge of the anatomy of the genusSelaginella Spr. V. The Strobilus,”Ann. Bot., 1910,24, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott, D.H. “Origin of polystele in dicotyledons,” —, 1891,5, 514.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tansley, A. G. “Lectures on the evolution of the Filicinean vascular system. Lecture V. The evolution of the solenostele,”New Phyt., 1907,6, 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. — “Lectures on the evolution of the Filicinean vascular system. Lecture IX. The leaf-trace. Ontogeny,” —, 1908,7, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. H. Chaudhuri

Read before the monthly meeting of the Botanical Society of Bengal, 1941.

My thanks are due to Dr. A. C. Joshi for his kindly going through the MSS. and many helpful suggestions which have considerably enhanced the value of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Majumdar, G.P. The origin of siphonostele in three species ofSelaginella spr.. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 15, 172–177 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048756

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048756

Keywords

Navigation