Abstract
Selenium has been reported to affect glutathione (GSH) concentrations in short-term animal-feeding experiments. Given the central role that this tripeptide plays in maintaining cellular homeostasis, it was hypothesized that perturbations in glutathione metabolism induced by selenium might account for its cancer chemopreventive activity. In the present study, four experiments were conducted in which the effect of acute, short-, or long-term exposure to selenium was assessed. Selenium was provided as either sodium selenite orD,L-selenomethionine. Selenite was observed to induce a biphasic response in total liver GSH. Injected selenium caused an acute reduction in GSH, whereas short-term feeding (up to 8 wk) increased both total GSH and oxidized glutathione (GSSH), an effect that gradually diminished in magnitude with prolonged feeding. Our data suggest that such changes are unlikely to account for the chemopreventive activity of selenium for the following reasons: Perturbations in glutathione metabolism occurred only at doses of selenite that approached toxicity. These doses are higher than what would be required for producing cancer chemoprevention. The transient nature of these changes also contrasts with the need for a continuous supplementation of selenite in suppression of tumorigenesis. Furthermore, selenomethionine was found to have little activity in altering glutathione metabolism, even though it compares favorably with selenite as a cancer chemopreventive agent. Nonetheless, these findings do not discount the possibility that sulfhydryl compounds, such as glutathione, might be used to modify the toxicity and/or enhance the cancer prophylactic activity of selenium compounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. A. Milner,Fed. Proc. 44, 2568–2572 (1985).
C. Ip,J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 5, 7–20 (1986).
H. J. Thompson, E. J. Herbst, and L. D. Meeker,J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 77, 595–598 (1986).
D. Medina and C. J. Oborn,Cancer Res. 44, 4361–4365 (1984).
D. Medina and D. G. Morrison,Pathol. Immunopathol. Res. 7, 187–199 (1988).
C. Ip,J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 80, 258–262 (1988).
C. Ip and H. Ganther,Carcinogenesis 9, 1481–1484 (1988).
C. Ip and C. Hayes,Carcinogenesis 10, 921–925 (1989).
H. E. Ganther,J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 5, 1–5 (1986).
R. A. LeBoeuf and W. G. Hoekstra,J. Nutr. 113, 845–854 (1983).
R. A. LeBoeuf, K. L. Zentner, and W. G. Hoekstra,Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 180, 348–352 (1985).
N. S. Kosower and E. M. Kosower,Int. Rev. Cytol. 54, 109–160 (1978).
A. Meister,Nutr. Rev. 42, 397–410 (1984).
Report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies,J. Nutr. 107, 1340–1348 (1977).
J. L. Hoffman,Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 179, 136–140 (1977).
F. Tietze,Anal. Biochem. 27, 502–522 (1969).
G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran,Statistical Methods, Ed. 6, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, (1967) p. 325.
P. J. Hissin and R. Hilf,Anal. Biochem. 74, 214–226 (1976).
K. Mekhail-Ishak, D. Medina, and G. BatistCarcinogenesis 10, 2363–2366 (1989).
R. A. Sunde,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61, 1891–1900 (1984).
P. A. McAdam and O. A. Levander,Nutr. Res. 7, 601–610 (1987).
P. D. Whanger and J. A. Butler,J. Nutr. 118, 846–852 (1988).
C. Ip,Cancer Res. 41, 2683–2686 (1981).
C. Ip and F. B. Daniel,Cancer Res. 45, 61–65 (1985).
C. Ip,Cancer Lett. 39, 239–246 (1988).
H. J. Thompson, L. D. Meeker, and S. Kokoska,Cancer Res. 44, 2803–2806 (1984).
C. Ip,Cancer Res. 41, 4386–4390 (1981).
G. D. Frenkel, A. Walcott, and C. Middleton,Mol. Pharmacol. 31, 112–116 (1987).
L. N. Vernie, M. DeVries, L. Karreman, R. J. Topp, and W. S. Bont,Biochim. Biophys. Acta 739, 1–7 (1983).
G. Batist, A. G. Katki, R. W. Klecker, Jr., and C. E. Myers,Cancer Res. 46, 5482–5485 (1986).
J. P. Perchellet, E. M. Perchellet, D. K. Orten, and B. A. Schneider,Cancer Lett. 26, 283–293 (1985).
J. P. Perchellet, N. L. Abney, R. M. Thomas, Y. L. Guislain, and E. M. Perchellet,Cancer Res. 47, 477–485 (1987).
G. D. Frenkel and D. Falvey,Mol. Pharmacol. 34, 573–577 (1988).
G. D. Frenkel and D. Falvey,Biochem. Pharmacol. 38, 2849–2852 (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, H.J., Ip, C. Temporal changes in tissue glutathione in response to chemical form, dose, and duration of selenium treatment. Biol Trace Elem Res 30, 163–173 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990351
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990351