Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal changes in tissue glutathione in response to chemical form, dose, and duration of selenium treatment

Relevance to cancer chemoprevention by selenium

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selenium has been reported to affect glutathione (GSH) concentrations in short-term animal-feeding experiments. Given the central role that this tripeptide plays in maintaining cellular homeostasis, it was hypothesized that perturbations in glutathione metabolism induced by selenium might account for its cancer chemopreventive activity. In the present study, four experiments were conducted in which the effect of acute, short-, or long-term exposure to selenium was assessed. Selenium was provided as either sodium selenite orD,L-selenomethionine. Selenite was observed to induce a biphasic response in total liver GSH. Injected selenium caused an acute reduction in GSH, whereas short-term feeding (up to 8 wk) increased both total GSH and oxidized glutathione (GSSH), an effect that gradually diminished in magnitude with prolonged feeding. Our data suggest that such changes are unlikely to account for the chemopreventive activity of selenium for the following reasons: Perturbations in glutathione metabolism occurred only at doses of selenite that approached toxicity. These doses are higher than what would be required for producing cancer chemoprevention. The transient nature of these changes also contrasts with the need for a continuous supplementation of selenite in suppression of tumorigenesis. Furthermore, selenomethionine was found to have little activity in altering glutathione metabolism, even though it compares favorably with selenite as a cancer chemopreventive agent. Nonetheless, these findings do not discount the possibility that sulfhydryl compounds, such as glutathione, might be used to modify the toxicity and/or enhance the cancer prophylactic activity of selenium compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Milner,Fed. Proc. 44, 2568–2572 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Ip,J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 5, 7–20 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. J. Thompson, E. J. Herbst, and L. D. Meeker,J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 77, 595–598 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Medina and C. J. Oborn,Cancer Res. 44, 4361–4365 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Medina and D. G. Morrison,Pathol. Immunopathol. Res. 7, 187–199 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Ip,J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 80, 258–262 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Ip and H. Ganther,Carcinogenesis 9, 1481–1484 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Ip and C. Hayes,Carcinogenesis 10, 921–925 (1989).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. E. Ganther,J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 5, 1–5 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. A. LeBoeuf and W. G. Hoekstra,J. Nutr. 113, 845–854 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. A. LeBoeuf, K. L. Zentner, and W. G. Hoekstra,Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 180, 348–352 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. S. Kosower and E. M. Kosower,Int. Rev. Cytol. 54, 109–160 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Meister,Nutr. Rev. 42, 397–410 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies,J. Nutr. 107, 1340–1348 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. L. Hoffman,Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 179, 136–140 (1977).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Tietze,Anal. Biochem. 27, 502–522 (1969).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran,Statistical Methods, Ed. 6, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, (1967) p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. J. Hissin and R. Hilf,Anal. Biochem. 74, 214–226 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Mekhail-Ishak, D. Medina, and G. BatistCarcinogenesis 10, 2363–2366 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. A. Sunde,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61, 1891–1900 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. A. McAdam and O. A. Levander,Nutr. Res. 7, 601–610 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. D. Whanger and J. A. Butler,J. Nutr. 118, 846–852 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Ip,Cancer Res. 41, 2683–2686 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Ip and F. B. Daniel,Cancer Res. 45, 61–65 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Ip,Cancer Lett. 39, 239–246 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. H. J. Thompson, L. D. Meeker, and S. Kokoska,Cancer Res. 44, 2803–2806 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Ip,Cancer Res. 41, 4386–4390 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. G. D. Frenkel, A. Walcott, and C. Middleton,Mol. Pharmacol. 31, 112–116 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. L. N. Vernie, M. DeVries, L. Karreman, R. J. Topp, and W. S. Bont,Biochim. Biophys. Acta 739, 1–7 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. G. Batist, A. G. Katki, R. W. Klecker, Jr., and C. E. Myers,Cancer Res. 46, 5482–5485 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. J. P. Perchellet, E. M. Perchellet, D. K. Orten, and B. A. Schneider,Cancer Lett. 26, 283–293 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. J. P. Perchellet, N. L. Abney, R. M. Thomas, Y. L. Guislain, and E. M. Perchellet,Cancer Res. 47, 477–485 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. G. D. Frenkel and D. Falvey,Mol. Pharmacol. 34, 573–577 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. G. D. Frenkel and D. Falvey,Biochem. Pharmacol. 38, 2849–2852 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, H.J., Ip, C. Temporal changes in tissue glutathione in response to chemical form, dose, and duration of selenium treatment. Biol Trace Elem Res 30, 163–173 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990351

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990351

Index Entries

Navigation