Skip to main content
Log in

Further studies on the role of monoterpenes in pine host selection and oviposition ofThaumetopoea pityocampa

  • Entomology
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a young mixed pine plantation (Pinus nigra andP. pinea) in central Italy, the influence of the pine needle monoterpenes (R)-(+)-limonene, (S)-(−)-limonene and (1S)-(−)-β-pinene on the oviposition activity of the pine processionary moth,Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis et Schiffermüller), was assessed. Two application methods were compared: spraying the trees with the substances emulsified with water, and setting up polyethylene dispensers from which the monoterpenes evaporated. During the moth’s flight period weekly treatments (at 500 mg of monoterpene /l water) were carried out and the evaporation from the polyethylene dispensers (each with 5 g of a single monoterpene) was checked on each occasion by weighing the dispensers. The GLM analysis did not uncover any difference between the methods of application or between the pine species.T. pityocampa laid a significantly (P=0.01) lower number of egg masses on the trees treated with (1S)-(−)-β-pinene than on those treated with the other substances and on the control trees. A ∼45% reduction in egg mass number was obtained on the pines treated with (1S)-(−)-β-pinene, independent of the level of infestation, method of application or pine species. (R)-(+)-limonene and (S)-(−)-limonene were not effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demolin, G. (1969) Comportement des adultes deThaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. Dispersion spatiale, importance écologique.Ann. Sci. For. (Paris) 26:81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dormont, L., Roques, A. and Malosse, C. (1997) Efficiency of spraying mountain pine cones with oleoresin of Swiss stone pine cones to prevent insect attack.J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2261–2274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1998) Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geri, C. (1980) Étude sur les populations de processionnaire du pin (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff., Lepidoptera Thaumetopoeidae).in: Grison, P. [Ed.] Études Ecologiques et Ethnologiques dans le Niolu. Ch. VII.Ecol. Mediterr. 6:151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huchon, H. and Demolin, G. (1970) La bioécologie de la Processionnaire du pin, dispersion potentielle, dispersion actuelle.Rev. For. Franc. n. spéc. “La lutte biologique en forét — 1970”: 220–233.

  6. Hull, C.D., Cunningham, J.P., Moore, C.J., Zalucki, M.P. and Cribb, B.W. (2004) Discrepancy between antennal and behavioral responses for enantiomers ofα-pinene: electrophysiology and behavior ofHelicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera).J. Chem. Ecol. 30:2071–2084.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leather, S.R. (1987) Pine monoterpenes stimulate oviposition in the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43:295–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loreto, F., Nascetti, P., Graverini, A. and Mannozzi, M. (2000) Emission and content of monoterpenes in intact and wounded needles of the Mediterranean pine,Pinus pinea.Funct. Ecol. 14:589–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mateus, E., Farral, H., Zhang, Q.H. and Paiva, M.R. (1998) Relationship between the attack level by the processionary mothThaumetopoea pityocampa and volatile monoterpene composition for twelve pine species.Abstr. International Soc. Chemical Ecology 13th Annual Meeting (Ithaca, NY, USA), no. O-53.

  10. Mendel, Z. (1988) Host selection by the Pine Processionary CaterpillarThaumetopoea wilkinsoni.Phytoparasitica 16:101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ntiamoah, Y.A., Borden, J.H. and Pierce, H.D. Jr. (1996) Identity and bioactivity of oviposition deterrents in pine oil for the onion maggot,Delia antiqua.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 79:219–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadof, C.S. and Grant, G.G. (1997) Monoterpene composition ofPinus sylvestris varieties resistant and susceptible toDioryctria zimmermani.J. Chem. Ecol. 23:1917–1927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shu, S., Grant, G.G., Langevin, D., Lombardo, D.A. and MacDonald, L. (1997) Oviposition and electroantennogram responses ofDioryctria abietivorella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) elicited by monoterpenes and enantiomers from eastern white pine.J. Chem. Ecol. 23:35–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Städler, E. (1974) Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition behaviour of the eastern spruce budworm.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17:176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Street, R.A., Owen, S., Duckham, S.C., Boissard, C. and Hewitt, C.N. (1997) Effect of habitat and age on variations in volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions fromQuercus ilex andPinus pinea.Atmosp. Environ. 31:89–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tiberi, R. (1983) [Distribution of egg masses ofThaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) on a young plantation ofPinus pinaster andP. insignis.]Redia 66:603–614 (Italian, with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tiberi, R., Niccoli, A., Curini, M., Epifano, F., Marcotullio, M.C. and Rosati, O. (1999) The role of the monoterpene composition inPinus spp. needles, in host selection by the pine processionary caterpillar,Thaumetopoea pityocampa.Phytoparasitica 27:263–272.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiberi, R., Niccoli, A., Panzavolta, T., Marziali, L. and Bonuomo, L. (2002) Plant-phytophagous interactions in pine-forests. Oviposition preferences of pine processionary moth for different host-plants.Proc. IUFRO Conf. on Collecting and Analyzing Information for Sustainable Forest Management and Biodiversity Monitoring with Special Reference to Mediterranean Ecosystems (Palermo, Italy, 2001), pp. 176–178.

  19. Tiberi, R., Panzavolta, T., Niccoli, A. and Marziali, L. (2002) [Influence of monoterpenes on ovipositing females of the pine processionary moth.]Atti XIX Congresso Nazionale Italiano di Entomologia (Catania, Italy), pp. 823–829 (Italian, with English summary).

  20. Trexler, J.C. and Travis, J. (1993) Nontraditional regression analyses.Ecology 74:1629–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Q.H., Schlyter, F., Battisti, A., Birgersson, G. and Anderson, P. (2003) Electrophysiological responses ofThaumetopoea pityocampa females to host volatiles: implications for host selection of active and inactive terpenes.Anz. Schaedlkd. 76:103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, C.H. and Yan, Y.H. (2003) Oviposition behaviour of the pine caterpillar moth,Dendrolimus punctatus influenced by needle volatiles ofPinus massoniana.Sci. Silv. Sin. 39:91–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Tiberi.

Additional information

http://www.phytoparasitica.org posting July 29, 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niccoli, A., Panzavolta, T., Marziali, L. et al. Further studies on the role of monoterpenes in pine host selection and oviposition ofThaumetopoea pityocampa . Phytoparasitica 36, 313–321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980810

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980810

Key words

Navigation