Abstract
Under a wide variety of dynamic environmental conditions, natural selection appears to favor reproductive investment in a sexually produced offspring, carrying only half of the mother’s genes, over the investment in an asexually produced offspring, genetically identical to her. It is maintained that the same environmental conditions must affect the evolutionary cost and benefit of an investment in the prolongation of one’s own life versus an investment in sexual reproduction, in favor of the latter. The effects of different environmental conditions on the division of resources among sexual reproduction, asexual reproduction and prolongation of life are studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell G. 1982The masterpiece of nature: The evolution and genetics of sexuality. (Berkeley: University of California Press)
Bell B. and Maynard Smith J. 1987 Short term selection for recombinations among mutually antagonistic species.Nature (London) 328: 66–68
Bernstein H. H. C., Byerly H. F., Hopf F. A. and Michod R. E. 1985 Genetic damage, mutation and the evolution of sex.Science 229: 1277–1281
Eshel I. 1983 Evolutionary and continuous stability.J. Theor. Biol. 103: 99–111
Eshel I. and Sansone E. 1990 On the evolution of age-dependent allocation of teproductive resources (to be published)
Eshel I. and Weinshall D. 1987 Sexual reproduction and viability of future offspring.Am. Nat. 130: 775–787
Hamilton W. D. 1964 The genetical evolution of social behavior.J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1–15, 17-52
Hamilton W. D. 1966 The moulding of senescence by natural selection.J. Theor. Biol. 12: 12–45
Hamilton W. D. 1967 Extraordinary sex ratios.Science 156: 447–488
Hamilton W. D. 1972 Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in the social insects.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3: 193–232
Hamilton W. D. 1980 Sex versus non-sex versus parasite.Oikos 35: 282–290
Hamilton W. D. 1982 Pathogens as causes of genetic diversity in their host populations. InPopulation biology of infectious diseases (eds) R. M. Anderson and R. M. May (Berlin: Springer)
Hamilton W. D., Henderson P. A. and Moran N. A. 1981 Fluctuation of environment and coevolved antagonist polymorphism as factors in the maintenance of sex. InNatural selection and social behaviour (eds) R. D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle (New York: Chiron)
Maynard Smith J. 1978Evolution of sex (Cambridge: University.Press)
Maynard Smith J. and Price G. R. 1973 The logic of animal conflicts.Nature (London) 246: 15–18
Weinshall D. 1986 Why is a two-environment system not rich enough to explain the evolution of sex?Am. Nat. 128: 736–750
Weinshall D. and Eshel I. 1987 On the evolution of an optimal rate of sexuality.Am. Nat. 130: 570–578
Williams G. C. 1975Sex and evolution. InMonographs in population biology. (Princeton: University Press)
Williams G. C. and Mitton J. B. 1973 Why reproduce sexually?J. Theor. Biol. 39: 545–554
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eshel, I. On the moulding of senescence by natural selection in sexual and partly sexual populations. J. Genet. 69, 33–44 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931665
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931665