Skip to main content
Log in

Selective attention to orientation and closure: An event-related potential study

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded when the subjects attended selectively to stimuli in one visual field and responded to the targets including designated feature (orientation or closure) value. Attention to spatial location elicited enlarged P1 and N1 at posterior electrodes contralateral to the stimulus location, whereas selection to orientation or closure elicited selection negativity (SN) and a late negative component (LNC). The selection of spatial location was prior to the selection of orientation or closure. SN was elicited only by the stimuli in the attended visual field, suggesting that the selection of orientation and closure are contingent on the prior selection of location. Moreover, the onset latency of SN was earlier for closure selection than for orientation selection, indicating that the processing of closure occurred earlier than the processing of orientation. The results are consistent with the early-selection theories of attention and provide psycho-physiological evidence for the topology theory of visual perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Posner, M. I., Orienting of attention, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980, 32: 465.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksen, C. W., St. James, J. D., Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model, Perception and Psychophysics, 1986, 40: 225.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., Changing views of attention and automaticity, in Varieties of Attention, New York: Academic Press, 1984, 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Treisman, A. M., Gelade, A., A feature-integration, theory of attention, Cognitive Psychology, 1980, 12: 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Treisman, A. M., Gormican, S., Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries, Psychological Review, 1988, 95(1): 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duncan, J., Humphreys, G. W., Visual search and stimulus similarity, Psychological Review, 1989, 96(3): 433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillyard, S. A., Muente, T. F., Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials, Perception and Psychophysics, 1984, 36(2): 185.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anllo-vento, L., Hillyard, S. A., Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection, Perception and Psychophysics, 1996, 58(2): 191.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, V. P., Fan, S., Hillyard, S. A., Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses, Human Brain Mapping, 1995, 2(2): 170.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez Gonazalez, C. M., Clark, V. P., Fan, S. et al., Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials, Brain Topography, 1994, 7(1): 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A., Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance, Perception and Psychophysics, 1990, 47: 532.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harter, M. R., Aine, C. J., Brain mechanisms of visual selective attention, in Varieties, of Attention, New York: Academic Press, 1984, 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., Smulders, F. T., Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1993, 88: 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smid, H. G. O. M., Jakob, A., Heinze, H. J., The organization of multidimensional selection on the basis of color and shape: An event-related brain potential study, Perception and Psychophysics, 1997, 59(5): 693.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Naatanen, R., Attention and Brain Function, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, L., Topological structure in visual perception, Science, 1982, 218(12): 699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, L., Topological structure in the perception of apparent motion, Perception, 1985, 14: 197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, L., The detection of topological properties: a possible black cloud over the computational theory, in About Sciences of Thinking (in Chinese), Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press, 1986, 251–301.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, L., Holes and wholes: A reply to Rubin and Kanwisher, Perception and Psychophysics, 1990, 47(1): 47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimin Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, S., Fan, S. & Chen, L. Selective attention to orientation and closure: An event-related potential study. Sci. China Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 43, 232–241 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916827

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916827

Key words

Navigation