Skip to main content
Log in

New ethical challenges to mental health services research in the era of community-based care

  • Articles
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Research on the use and effectiveness of mental health services conducted across a wide variety of settings, under new and diverse state-based legal statutes, and requiring the linking of a variety of existing and proposed data sources raises a number of ethical considerations. These new conditions are reviewed in the context of federal regulations for the protection of human subjects and, in particular, informed consent. Illustrations, suggestions, and resources are offered from recent experiences in a longitudinal, multisource study of the impact of a hospital closing on individual consumers, families, workers, and system costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dworkin RJ:Researching Persons with Mental Illness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diener E, Crandall R:Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Isaac RJ, Armat VC:Madness in the Streets: How Psychiatry and the Law Abandoned the Mentally Ill. New York: Free Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute of Mental Health:Caring for People with Severe Mental Disorders: A National Plan to Improve Services. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 91-1762. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cook JA, Wright ER: Medical sociology and the study of severe mental illness: Reflections on past accomplishments and directions for future research.Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1995; 36(Supplementary Issue):95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Penslar RL:Protecting Human Research Subjects: Institutional Review Board Guidebook. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations; Title 45, Part 46, 1995.

  8. Attkisson C, Cook JA, Karno M, et al.: Clinical services research.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1992; 18(4):561–626.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fulford KWM, Howse K: Ethics of research with psychiatric patients: Principles, problems, and the primary responsibilities of researchers.Journal of Medical Ethics 1993; 19:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research:Research Involving Those Institutionalized as Mentally Infirm. DHHS Publication No. OS 78-0007. Washington, DC. Department of Health and Welfare, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Benson PR, Roth LH, Applebaum PS, et al.: Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research.Law and Human Behavior 1988; 12(4):455–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stanley B, Sieber JE, Melton GB: Empirical studies of ethical issues in research.American Psychologist 1987; 42(7):735–741.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley B, Stanley M, Lautin A, et al.: Preliminary findings on psychiatric patients as research participants: A population at risk?American Journal of Psychiatry 1981; 138(5):669–671.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DeRenzo EG: The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 1994; 16(6):7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wear S:Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence within Clinical Medicine. Dordrecht, Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher JC, Dommel FW, Cowell DD: Consent to research with impaired human subjects.IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 1985; 7(6):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adult abuse, neglect, and exploitation: Duty to report cases of abuse, neglect or exploitation of vulnerable adults.Idaho Code, Annotated. Title 39, sec. 5303(1). Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company, 1993, 1995 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abuse of adults: Persons required to report abuse.Arkansas Code of 1987, Annotated. Title 5, sec. 28-203. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company, 1993, 1996 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Adult protective services: Reporting abuse, etc.Maryland Code, Annotated. Title 14, sec. 302. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company, 1991, 1995 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Social welfare act: Report of abuse, neglect, exploitation of adults: Reports.Michigan Compiled Laws, Annotated. c. 400, sec. 11a. St. Paul, MN: West, 1988, 1995 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Adult protective services: Duty to report.Delaware Code, Annotated. Title 31, c. 39, sec. 3910. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company, 1985, 1994 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Protection from abuse, neglect and exploitation: Mandatory reporting of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of disabled adults or elderly persons; mandatory reports of death.West's Florida Statutes, Annotated. Title 30, c. 415, sec. 1034. St. Paul, MN: West, 1993, 1996 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Adult protective services: Duty to report endangered adult.West's Annotated Indiana Code. Title 12, art. 10, c. 3, sec. 9. St. Paul, MN: West, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abuse and neglect of adults: Reports.West's Louisiana Revised Statutes. Title 14, c. 2, pt. V, sec. 403.2(C). St. Paul, MN: West, 1986, 1995 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reports of domestic abuse, neglect, or exploitation.West's Smith-Hurd Illinois Compiled Statutes, Annotated. c. 20, act 2435, sec. 25. St. Paul, MN: West, 1993.

  26. Protective services for adults at risk of mistreatment or self-neglect: Reporting requirements.West's Colorado Revised Statutes, Annotated. Title 26, art. 3.1, sec. 102. St. Paul, MN: West, 1990, 1995 supp.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Othmer E, Othmer SC:The Clinical Interview Using DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Waldinger RJ:Fundamentals of Psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Instructions for authors.Journal of the American Medical Association 1996; 275(1):6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Instructions to authors.Neuroscience 1996; 70 (1):vi.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Instructions to authors.Journal of Comparative Psychology 1995; 109(4):338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, E.R., Pescosolido, B.A. & Penslar, R.L. New ethical challenges to mental health services research in the era of community-based care. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 24, 139–151 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898509

Keywords

Navigation