Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Glacial and postglacial vegetation

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersson, G. Die Veränderungen des Klimas seit dem Maximum der letzten Eiszeit. Cong. Geol. Internat. 11th Session1: 371–377. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antevs, E. The Quaternary ice age in North America. Brooklyn Bot. Gard. Rec.21: 186–202. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auer, V. Peat bogs in southeastern Canada. Can. Geol. Surv. Mem.162: 1–32. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, F. C. Molluscan life of the loess deposits of Illinois. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci.20:269–292. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barkley, F. A. The statistical theory of pollen analysis. Ecology15: 283–289. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowman, P. W. Study of a peat bog near the Matamek River, Quebec, Canada, by the method of pollen analysis. Ecology12: 694–708. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brückner, E. Über die Klimaschwankungen der Quartärzeit und ihre Uhrsachen. Congr. Geol. Internat. 11th Session1: 379–389. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bryan, K., et al. Reviews of papers on the geomorphology of North America, 1932/33. Zeitschr. Geomorphologie7: 1–42. 1932/33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cocke, E. C., Lewis, I. F., andPatrick, R. A further study of Dismal Swamp peat. Am. Journ. Bot.21: 374–395. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman, A. P. Ice ages recent and ancient. 1–296. New York, 1929.

  11. Cooper, W. S. A third expedition to Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecology12:61–95. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper, W. S., andFoot, H. Reconstruction of a late-Pleistocene biotic community in Minneapolis, Minn. Ecology.13: 63–72. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dachnowski-Stokes, A. Records of climatic cycles in peat deposits. Rep. 2nd. Conf. on Cycles. 55–64. Washington, 1929.

  14. Dokturowsky, W. S. Die interglaziale Flora in Russland. Geol. Foren. Förhandl.51: 389–410. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Erdtman, G. Boreal forests and the theory of pollen statistics. Journ. Ecol.19: 158–163. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. —. Worpswede-Wabamun. Abh. Nat. Ver. Bremen.28: 11–17. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  17. —. Literature on pollen-statistics and related topics published in 1932 and 1933. Geol. Fören. Förhandl.56: 463–481. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. —, andErdtman, H. The improvement of pollen-analysis technique. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.27: 347–357. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Firbas, F. Die Vegetationsentwicklung des mitteleuropäischen Spätglazials. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen VI. NF1: 17–24. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  20. —. Zur spät- und nacheiszeitlichen Vegetationsgeschichte der Rheinpfalz. Beih. Bot. Centr52: 119–156. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  21. —, andGrahmann, R. Über jungdiluviale und alluviale Torflager in der Grube Marga bei Senftenberg (Niederlausitz). Abh. Math.-Phys. Kl. Sächs. Akad. Wiss.40: 1–63. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gams, H. Die vegetations- und klimageschichtliche Bedeutung der Alpenseen und Alpenmoore. Forsch, u. Fortschr.8: 197. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gleason, H. A. The vegetational history of the Middle West. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geog.12: 39–85. 1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Griggs, R. F. The edge of the forest in Alaska and the reasons for its position. Ecology15: 80–96. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gross, H. Das Problem der nacheiszeitlichen Klima- und Florenentwicklung in Nord- und Mitteleuropa. Beih. Bot. Centr. Abt.II, 47:1–110. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —. Zur Frage des weberschen Grenzhorizontes in den östlichen Gebieten der ombrogenen Moorregion. Beih. Bot. Centr.51: 305–353. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hanna, G. D. Diatoms of the Florida peat deposits. Ann. Rep. Fla. State Geol. Surv.23-24: 65–96. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harper, H. J. Further investigations of buried soils in relation to climatic changes in Oklahoma. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci.14: 65–67. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hollick, A. Plant remains from a pleistocene lake deposit in the upper Connecticut River valley. Brittonia1: 35–55. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hotchkiss, W. O., andIngersoll, L. R. Postglacial time calculations from recent geothermal measurements in the Calumet copper mines. Jour. Geol.42: 113–122. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Houdek, P. K. Pollen statistics from two Indiana bogs. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci.42: 3–7. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jessen, K., andMilthers, V. Stratigraphical and paleontological studies of interglacial freshwater deposits in Jutland and northwest Germany. Danm. geol. Unders. II,48: 1–379. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jimbo, T. Pollen analytical studies of peat formed on volcanic ash. Sci. Rep. Tôhoku Imp. Univ. ser. 4.7: 129–132. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Keller, P. Wandlungen des Landschaftbildes in prähistorischer Zeit. Arb. Prähist. Abt. hist. Mus. St. Gallen1: 1–57. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lane, G. H. A preliminary pollen analysis of the East McCulloch peat bed. Ohio Journ. Sci.31: 165–171. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lindsey, A. J. Preliminary fossil pollen analysis of the Merrillville white pine bog. Butler Univ. Bot. Stud.2: 179–182. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Potzger, J. E. Succession of forests as indicated by fossil pollen from a northern Michigan bog. Science75: 366. 1932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Premik, J., andPiech, K. Zur Kenntnis des Diluviums im süd-westlichen Mittelpolen. Ann. de la Soc. Géol. de Pologne8: 1–132. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rudolph, K. Grundzüge der nacheiszeitlichen Waldgeschichte Mitteleuropas. Beih. bot. Centr.47: 111–176. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sayles, R. W. Bermuda during the Ice Age. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and Sci.66: 379–467. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sears, P. B. Postglacial climate in eastern North America. Ecology13: 1–6. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. —. Climatic change as a factor in forest succession. Journ. For.31: 934–942. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sernander, R. The warm postglacial period and the postglacial climatic deterioration of northern Europe. Proc. Int. Congr. Plant Sci. Ithaca1: 663–666. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Szafer, W. The climatic character of the last interglacial period in Europe. Proc. Int. Congr. Plant Sci. Ithaca1: 647–653. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thwaites, F. T. Outline of glacial geology. 1–115. Ann Arbor, 1934.

  46. von Post, L. Problems and working-lines in the postarctic forest history of Europe. Proc. 5th Int. Bot. Congr. Cambridge. 48–54. 1930.

  47. Voss, J. Pleistocene forests of central Illinois. Bot. Gaz.94: 808–814. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. —. Postglacial migration of forests in Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota. Bot. Gaz.96: 3–43. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilson, L. R. The Two Creeks forest bed, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. Trans. Wisc. Acad. Sci.27: 31–46. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oklahoma, USA

    Paul B. Sears

Authors
  1. Paul B. Sears
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Contribution No. 31, Bot. Lab., Univ. of Okla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sears, P.B. Glacial and postglacial vegetation. Bot. Rev 1, 37–51 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869925

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869925

Keywords

Search

Navigation