Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of some soil physical properties on potato yields and grade distribution

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Yields of U. S. No. 1 potatoes and numbers of deformed tubers were significantly correlated with air permeability near the surface and soil bulk densities down to 8 inches. Yields of No. 1 grade were correlated positively with soil air permeability and negatively with soil bulk density, whereas for deformed tuber production the correlations were the reverse. Total tuber production had a low correlation with soil factors because of the opposing responses of U. S. No. 1’s and deformed tubers. In a multiple-regression analysis, large variations in total yield, grade distribution, emergence rate, and final stand were accounted for by considering soil bulk density, soil strength, and air permeability. Production of quality tubers was closely associated with mechanical-impedance factors in the immediate zone of tuber development. Yields of U. S. No. 1’s were reduced 35% by a severe soil-compaction treatment in the beds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Barley, K. P. and E. L. Greacen. 1967. Mechanical resistance as a soil factor influencing the growth of roots and underground shoots. Adv. in Agron. 19: 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blake, G. R., D. H. Boelter, E. P. Adams, and J. K. Aase. 1960. Soil compaction and potato growth. Amer. Potato J. 37: 409–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, Lyle M. 1967. Portable recording penetrometer measures soil strength profiles. Agr. Eng. 48: 348–349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, Lyle M. 1969. Integrating penetrometer provides average soil strength. Agr. Eng. 50: 618–619.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flocker, W. J., H. Timm and J. A. Vomocil. 1960. Effect of soil compaction on tomato and potato yields. Agron. J. 52: 345–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flocker, W. J. and Herman Timm. 1966. Effect of soil moisture tension and physical condition of soil on utilization of water and nutrients by potatoes. Agron. J. 58: 290–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grover, Ben L. 1955. Simplified air permeameters for soil in place. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 19: 414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor, Howard M. and Herbert R. Gardner. 1963. Penetration of cotton seedling taproots as influenced by bulk density, moisture content, and strength of soil. Soil Sci. 96: 153–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Timm, Herman and W. J. Flocker. 1966. Responses of potato plants to fertilization and soil moisture tension under induced soil compaction. Agron. J. 58: 153–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from the departments of Water Science and Engineering and Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis 95616.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grimes, D.W., Bishop, J.C. The influence of some soil physical properties on potato yields and grade distribution. American Potato Journal 48, 414–422 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02863531

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02863531

Keywords

Navigation