Skip to main content
Log in

Subsumption checking between concept queries in different ontologies based on mutual instances

  • Semantic Web and Intelligent Web
  • Published:
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences

Abstract

This paper proposes a checking method based on mutual instances and discusses three key problems in the method: how to deal with mistakes in the mutual instances and how to deal with too many or too few mutual instances. It provides the checking based on the weighted mutual instances considering fault tolerance, gives a way to partition the large-scale mutual instances, and proposes a process greatly reducing the manual annotation work to get more mutual instances. Intension annotation that improves the checking method is also discussed. The method is practical and effective to check subsumption relations between concept queries in different ontologies based on mutual instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guarino N. Formal Ontology and Information Systems.Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, Trento, 1998. 3–15.

  2. Kalfoglou Y, Schorlemmer M. Ontology Mapping: the State of the Art.The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2003,18 (1):1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deen S M, Al-Qasem M. A Query Subsumption Technique.Proceedings of the 10th International Conference Database and Expert Systems Applications, Florence, 1999. 362–371.

  4. Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D L,et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Doan A, Madhavan J, Domingos P,et al. Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web.Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on World Wide Web, Honolulu, 2002. 662–673.

  6. Rodriguez M A, Egenhofer M J. Determining Semantic Similarity Among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2003,15: 442–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Everitt B S, Landau S, Leese M.Cluster Analysis (4th edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Bao-wen.

Additional information

Foundation item: Supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (60373066, 60425206, 90412003), National Grand Fundamental Research 973 Program of China(2002CB312000), National Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20020286004)

Biography: KANG Da-zhou(1980-), male, Ph.D. candidate, research direction: semantic Web, knowledge representation on the Web.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Da-zhou, K., Jian-jiang, L., Bao-wen, X. et al. Subsumption checking between concept queries in different ontologies based on mutual instances. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 11, 68–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02831706

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02831706

Key words

CLC number

Navigation