Summary
To identify possible reasons that may contribute to recalcitrance in plant protoplasts, the time course of new cell wall deposition was studied by scanning electron microscopy in protoplasts of a recalcitrant species, the grapevine. Results showed that microfibrils were developed after 2 days of culture, that complete cell wall formation occurred on Day 6 to 7 of protoplast culture, and its ultrastructural appearance was identical to that of grapevine leaf-derived callus cells. In addition, a comparative study was undertaken on [U-14C]glucose uptake and incorporation in ethanol-soluble, cellulosic, and noncellulosic polysaccharide fractions in protoplasts of grapevine and of a readily regenerating species, tobacco, during culture. There was a significantly higher [U-14C]glucose uptake by tobacco than by grapevine protoplasts. The label distribution in the ethanol-soluble, cellulosic, and noncellulosic fractions of newly synthesized cell walls differed quantitatively between the two species. In particular, the labeled glucose incorporated in the noncellulosic cell wall fraction was threefold greater in tobacco than in grapevine protoplasts. Differences were also revealed in the monosaccharide composition of this fraction between the two species. Addition of dimethyl sulfoxide to the culture medium resulted in a dramatic increase in [U-14C]glucose uptake by grapevine protoplasts, whereas it exhibited a limited effect in tobacco protoplasts. It showed no effect on the ultrastructural characteristics of new cell wall nor on the incorporation rate of labeled glucose in the cellulosic and noncellulosic cell wall fractions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asamizu, T.; Tanaka K.; Takebe, L., et al. Change in molecular size of cellulose during regeneration of cell wall on carrot protoplasts. Physiol. Plant. 40:215–218; 1977.
Asamizu, T.; Nishi, A. Regenerated cell wall of carrot protoplasts isolated from suspension-cultured cells. Physiol. Plant. 48:207–212; 1980.
Blaschek, W.; Haass, D.; Koehler, H., et al. Cell wall regeneration byNicotiana tabacum protoplast: chemical and biochemical aspects. Plant. Sci. Lett. 22:47–57; 1981.
Brown, R. M., Jr. Haigler, C. H.; Suttie, J., et al. The biosynthesis and degradation of cellulose. J. Appl. Polymer. Sci. 37:33–78; 1983.
Burgess, J.; Fleming, E. N. Ultrastructural observations of cell wall regeneration around isolated tobacco protoplasts. J. Cell Sci., 14:439–449; 1974.
Burgess, J.; Linstead, P. J. Scanning electron microscopy of cell wall formation around isolated plant protoplasts. Planta 131:173–178; 1976.
Burgess, J.; Linstead, P. J.; Bonsall, V. E. Observations on the time course of wall development at the surface of isolated protoplasts. Planta 139:85–91; 1978.
Burgess, J.; Linstead, P. J. Structure and association of wall fibrils produced by regenerating tobacco protoplasts. Planta 146:203–210; 1979.
Darken, M. A. Applications of fluorescent brightness in biological techniques. Science 133:1704–1705; 1961.
Hahne, G.; Hoffmann, F. Dimethyl sulfoxide can initiate cell divisions of arrested callus protoplasts by promoting cortical microtubule assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:5449–5453; 1984.
Heiniger, U.; Delmer, D. P. UDP-glucose: glucan synthetase in developing cotton fibers. II Structure of the reaction product. Plant. Physiol. 59:719–723; 1977.
Ishii, S.. Factors influencing protoplasts viability of suspension-cultured rice cells during isolation process. Plant. Physiol. 88:26–29; 1988.
Katsirdakis, K. C.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K. A. Modified culture conditions for increased viability and cell wall synthesis (Vitis vinifera L. cv Sultanina) leaf protoplasts. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 28:255–260; 1992.
Klein, A. S.; Montezinos, D.; Delmer, D. P. Cellulose and 1,3-glucan synthesis during the early stages of wall regeneration in soybean protoplasts. Planta 152:105–114: 1981.
Mock, H.-P.; Emmerling, M.; Seitz, H. U. Cell wall synthesis in carrot cells: comparison of suspension-cultured cells and regenerating protoplasts. Physiol. Plant. 79:347–353; 1990.
Osborn, M.; Weber, K. Dimethyl sulfoxide and the ionophore A 23187 affect the arrangement of actin and induce, nuclear actin paracrystals in ptk2 cells. Exp. Cell Res. 129:103–114; 1980.
Seitz, M. V.; Seitz, U.; Alfermann, W. Pflanzliche gewebekultur. Ein stuttgart: Praktikum Gustav Fischer Verlag: 1985:85–87.
Takeuchi, Y.; Komamine, A. Composition of the cell wall formed by protoplasts isolated from cell suspension cultures ofVinca rosea. Planta 140:227–232; 1978.
Theodoropoulos, P. A.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K. A. Mechanism of arginine transport inVitis vinifera L. protoplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 40:1223–1230; 1989.
Theodoropoulos, P. A.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K. A. Progress in leaf protoplast isolation and culture from virus-free axenic shoot cultures ofVitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 20:15–23; 1990.
Theodoropoulos, P. A.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K. A. Glucose transport inVitis vinifera L. protoplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 42:237–244; 1991.
Updegraff, D. M. Semi-micro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal. Biochem. 32:420–424; 1969.
Watson, L. P.; McKee, A. E.; Merrell, B. P. Preparation of microbiological specimens for scanning electron microscopy. In: SEM/1980/II, O’Hare, IL: SEM Inc AMF; 1980:45–55.
Willison, J. H. M. Synthesis of cell walls by higher plant protoplasts. In: Peberdy, J. F.; Rose, A. H.; Cocking, E. C., eds. Microbial and plant protoplasts. London: Academic Press; 1976:283–298.
Willison, J. H. M.; Groot, B. W. Further observations on cell wall formation around isolated protoplasts of tobacco and tomato. Planta 140:53–58; 1978.
Zhong, H.; Lauchli, A. Incorporation of (14C)Glucose into cell polysaccharides of cotton roots: effects of NaCl and NaCl2. Plant Physiol. 88:511–514; 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katsirdakis, K.C., Roubelakis-Angelakis, K.A. Ultrastructural and biochemical aspects of cell wall reconstitution in recalcitrant (grapevine) and regenerating (tobacco) leaf protoplasts. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol –Plant 28, 90–96 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823025
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823025