Summary
A rapid, efficient assay that is nondestructive and semiquantitative for identifying transgenic plants and progeny from Biolistic® and protoplast transformations is described. Leaf sections of maize and wheat plants are placed on an indicator medium containing chlorophenol red and the selection agent. Changes in the color of the medium from red to yellow resulting from altered pH indicate transformed plants within 2-5 d. The method is particularly suited to use with phosphinothricin and could be used with other suitable selectable markers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deblock, M. The cell biology of plant transformation current state, problems, prospects and the implications for the plant breeding. Euphytica 71:1-14; 1993.
DeBlock, M.; DeBrouwer, D.; Tenning, P. Transformation ofBrassica napus andBrassica oleracea usingAgrobacterium tumefaciens and the expression of thebar andneo genes in the transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 91:694-701; 1989.
DeKeyser, R.; Claes, B.; Marichal, M., et al. Evaluation of selectable markers for rice transformation. Plant Physiol. 90:217-223; 1989.
Geiser, M.; Schweitzer, S.; Grimm, C. The hypervariable region in the genes coding for entomopathogenic crystal proteins ofBacillus thuringiensis: nucleotide sequence of the kurhdI gene of subsp. kurstaki HD1. Gene 48:109-118; 1986.
Harms, C. T.; Armour, S. L.; DiMaio, J. J., et al. Herbicide resistance due to amplification of a mutant acetohydroxyacid synthase gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 233:427-435; 1992.
Hudspeth, R. L.; Grula, J. W. Structure and expression of the maize gene encoding the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase isozyme involved in C4 photosynthesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 12:579-589; 1989.
Koziel, M. G.; Beland, G. L.; Bowman, C., et al. Field performance of elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal protein derived fromBacillus thuringiensis. Bio/technology 11:194-200; 1993.
Kramer, C.; DiMaio, J.; Carswell, G., et al. Selection of transformed protoplast-derivedZea mays colonies with phosphinothricin and a novel assay using the pH indicator chlorophenol red. Planta 190:454-458; 1993.
Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497; 1962.
Reed, J.; Jayne, S.; Nahory, J., et al. Production of fertile transgenic wheat plants by particle bombardment of immature embryos. In: Abstracts VIIIth International Congress of Plant Tissue and Cell Culture; 1994; p. 149.
Ryu, D. D. Y.; Lee, S. O.; Romani, R. J. Determination of growth rate for plant cell cultures: comparative studies. Biotech. Bioeng. 35:305-311; 1990.
Shang, X. M.; Huang, J. Y.; Haigler, C. H., et al. Buffer capacity of cotton cells and effects of extracellular pH on growth and somatic embryogenesis in cotton cell suspensions. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 27P:147-152; 1991.
Shillito, R. D.; Carswell, G. K.; Johnson, C. M., et al. Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of elite inbred maize. Bio/technology 7:581-587; 1989.
Thompson, D. J.; Movya, N. R.; Tizard, R., et al. Characterization of the herbicide-resistance genebar fromStreptomyces hygroscopus. EMBO J. 6:2519-2524; 1987.
Vasil, V.; Srivastava, V.; Castillo, A. M., et al. Rapid production of transgenic wheat plants by direct bombardment of cultured immature embryos. Bio/technology 11:1553-1558; 1993.
Weeks, T.; Anderson, O. D.; Blechl, A. E. Rapid production of multiple independent lines of fertile transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiol. 102:1077-1084; 1993.
Weeks, T., et al. Stable transformation of wheat (T. aestivum) by microprojectile bombardment. Keystone Symposium: Improved crop and plant products through biotechnology, Jan 9-16, 1994.
Weymann, K.; Urban, K.; Ellis, D., et al. Isolation of transgenic progeny of maize by embryo rescue under selective conditions. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 29P:33-37; 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, M.S., Launis, K., Bowman, C. et al. A rapid visual method to identify transformed plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol – Plant 32, 11–13 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823006
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823006