Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for assessing program institutionalization

  • Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge in Society

Abstract

This article presents a framework for assessing the institutionalization of programmatic innovations in nonprofit community agencies and in schools. Institutionalization is the attainment of long-term viability and integration of innovations in organizations. Institutionalization is often characterized as the final stage in an innovation diffusion process.

The framework was derived from a qualitative study of ten health promotion programs that were innovations in their host organizations. The framework is a two dimensional matrix: one dimension consists of organizational subsystems; the other consists of levels of institutionalization termed passages, routines, and niche saturation. The cells of the matrix are the basis for assessing program institutionalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H.E. (1979).Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. (1978). Study of macro-implementation and micro-implementation.Public Policy, 26(2), 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1978).Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. 8: Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M. (1978).Implementing change: Alcoholism policies in work organizations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, A.F. (1981).The medically-oriented common-software computer-based information system adoption process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G.W., & Mohr, L.B. (1979). Toward a theory of innovation.Administration and Society, 10(4), 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, E. (1981). Durability of innovations in human services organizations.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 167–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P.S., Bazerman, M., & Conlon, E. (1980). Institutionalization of planned organizational change. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 1 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P.S., & Dean, J.W. (1982). Creating long-term organizational change. In P.S. Goodman (Ed.),Change in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R.M., & Steckler, A. (1987–88). The life and death of a health program: An institutionalization case study.International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 8(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G.E., & Loucks, S.F. (1977). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented.American Educational Research Journal, 14(3), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G.E., & Rutherford, W.L. (1976). Concerns of teachers about implementing team teaching.Educational Leadership, 34(3), 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1984).Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluzny, A.D., Schenck, A.P., Ricketts, T.C. (1986). Cancer prevention in the workplace: An organizational innovation.Health Promotion, 1, 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, R. (1983).The change masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978).The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, G.E. (1985). The persistence of planned organizational change: A process theory perspective.Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 12B. (University Microfilms No. 85-02,869).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. (1983). Unraveling the mystery of instituionalization.Educational Leadership, 41(3), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M.M. (1981). Stress management classes, a health promotion tool.Canadian Nurse, 77(6), 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelto, P.J., & Pelto, G.H. (1978).Anthropological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C.L., & Jessor, R. (1985). The concept of health promotion and the prevention of adolescent drug abuse.Health Education Quarterly, 12(2), 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1983).Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheirer, M.A., & Rezmovic, E.L. (1983). Measuring the degree of implementation: A methodological review.Evaluation Review, 7(5), 599–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J.P. (1980).Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L.G., & Klein, J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption—implementation: A meta-analysis of findings.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1979). Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health.Healthy people: The surgeon general's report on health promotion and disease prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. (1976). Implementation analysis and assessment. In W. Williams & R.F. Elmore (Eds.),Social program implementation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1979).Changing urban bureaucracies: How new practices become routinized. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1984).Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Robert M. Goodman is a research assistant professor in the Department of Health Behavior and Health Education at the University of North Carolina's School of Public Health. Currently, Dr. Goodman directs a four-year intervention study on the dissemination of tobacco prevention curricular funded by the National Cancer Institute.

Allan Steckler is an associate professor in the Department of Health Behavior and Health Education at the University of North Carolina's School of Public Health. Dr. Steckler is also the principal investigator of the National Cancer Institute tobacco prevention study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, R.M., Steckler, A. A framework for assessing program institutionalization. Knowledge in Society 2, 57–71 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737075

Keywords

Navigation