Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative effect of epinephrine and aminophylline in the treatment of asthma

  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-seven patients with severe asthma were randomized into three groups and treated double-blindly with either aminophylline, epinephrine, or a combination of these two for one hour and then with both drugs for an additional hour. All patients began with plasma theophylline levels less than 10 µg/ml and all achieved 17 µg/ml. Epinephrine produced 134% improvement in FEV1 in one hour compared to 38% improvement produced by aminophylline. Epinephrine and combination therapy produced the same amount of bronchodilatation in one hour. Patients whose initial PEFR was ≦100 l/min failed to improve with aminophylline alone. After two hours of treatment, there was no difference in FEV1 or PEFR among the three groups. Arrhythmias and vomiting occurred more frequently when aminophylline was used and these adverse responses did not correlate with plasma theophylline levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Thoracic Society, Commmitee on diagnostic standards for nontuberculous respiratory disease (1962) Definitions and classifications of chronic bronchitis, asthma and pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 85:762–768

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austen KF, Orange RP (1975) Bronchial asthma: the possible role of chemical mediators of immediate hypersensitivity in the pathogenesis of subacute chronic disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 112:423–436

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bresnick E, Beakey JF, Levinson L, Segal MS (1949) Evaluation of therapeutic substances employed for the relief of bronchospasm. V. Adrenergic agents. J Clin Invest 28:1182–1189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferris BG, Anderson DO, Zickmantel R (1965) Prediction values for screening tests of pulmonary function. Am Rev Respir Dis 91:252–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuleihan FJD, Abdel-Baki N, Arslanian A (1969) The effect of intravenous aminophylline on pulmonary function. Chest 56:481–487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Galant SP, Grancy CE, Duriseti S, Strick L (1978) The effect of metaproterenol in chronic asthmatic children receiving therapeutic doses of theophylline. J Allergy Clin Immunol 61:73–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hendeles L, Weinberger M (1979) Guidelines for avoiding theophylline overdosage (Letter to the Editor). N Engl J Med 300:1217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hume KM, Jones ER (1961) The response to bronchodilators in intrinsic asthma. Q J Med 30:189–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jenne JW, Wyze E, Rood FS, MacDonald FM (1972) Pharmacokinetics of theophylline: application to adjustment of the clinical dose of aminophylline. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13:349–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jusko WJ, Koup Jr, Vance JW, Schentag JJ (1977) Intravenous theophylline therapy: nomogram guidelines. Ann Intern Med 86:400–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karetzky MS, Brandstetter RD, Meyer RC, Tedaldi EM (1974) Acute asthma. A comparison of the immediate effects of six different modes of therapy. Am J Med Sci 267:213–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kory RC, Pribek RA, Sternlieb RO (1958) Comparative evaluation of epinephrine and aminophylline as bronchodilator agents. Am Rev Respir Dis 77:729–736

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kory RC, Callahan R, Boren HG, Snyder JC (1961) The Veterans Administration-Army cooperative study of pulmonary function. I. Clinical spirometry in normal man. Am J Med 30:243–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawyer CH, Kepple J, Bardana EJ, Jr (1977) Theophylline in liver disease (Letter to the Editor). N Engl J Med 297:1122–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenstein LM, Margolis S (1968) Histamine releasein vitro: Inhibition by catecholamines and methylxanthines. Science 161:920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindholm B, Helander E (1966) The effect on the pulmonary ventilation of different theophylline derivatives compared to adrenaline and isoprenaline. Allergy 21:299–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mangione A, Jusko WJ, Imhoff TE, Lee RV (1977) Theophylline in liver disease (Letter to the Editor). N Engl J Med 297:1122–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitenko PA, Ogilvie RI (1973) Rational intravenous doses of theophylline. N Engl Med 289:600–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mushin GJ (1967) Time factor in the measurement of response to bronchodilators. Thorax 22:538–542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholson DP, Chick TW (1973) A re-evaluation of parenteral aminophylline. Am Rev Respir Dis 108:241–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parker CW, Smith JW (1973) Alterations in cyclic adenosine monophosphate metabolism in human bronchial asthma. I. Leukocyte responsiveness to Beta-adrenergic agents. J Clin Invest 52:48–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Piafsky KM, Ogilvie RI (1975) Dosages of theophylline in bronchial asthma. N Engl J Med 292:1218–1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pihlajamaki K, Kanto J, Iisalo E (1972) Human and animal studies on the interactions between glyphylline and isoprenaline. J Asthma Res 9:255–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schack JA, Waxler SH (1949) An ultraviolet spectrophotometric method for the determination of theophylline and theobromine in blood and tissues. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 97:283–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Segal MS, Levinson L, Bresnick E, Beakey JF (1949) Evaluation of therapeutic substances employed for the relief of bronchospasm. VI. Aminophylline. J Clin Invest 28:1190–1195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shim CS, Scher SM, Williams MH (1976) Effect of bronchodilator agents on arrhythmia. NY State J Med 76:1973–1976

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Szentivanyi A, Fishel CW (1976) The Beta-adrenergic theory and cyclic-amp mediated control mechanisms in human asthma, Bronchial asthma. In: Weiss EB, Segal MS (eds) Mechanisms and therapeutics. Little Brown, Boston, p 137–154

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tai E, Read J: (1957) Response of blood gas tensions to aminophylline and isoprenaline in patients with asthma. Thorax 22:543–549

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weinberger MN, Bronsky, EA (1974) Evaluation of oral bronchodilator therapy in asthmatic children. J Pediat 84:421–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams SJ, Parrish RW, Seaton A (1975) Comparison of intravenous aminophylline and salbutamol in severe asthma. Br Med J IV:685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, p 514

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wolfe JD, Tushkin DP, Calvarese B, Simmons M (1978) Bronchodilator effects of terbutaline and aminophylline alone and in combination in asthmatic patients. N Engl J Med 298:363–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zar JH (1971) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, p 151–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Chest Service, Department of Medicine, Bronx Municipal Hospital Center, Bronx, New York, USA

    D. Appel & C. Shim

Authors
  1. D. Appel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Shim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Appel, D., Shim, C. Comparative effect of epinephrine and aminophylline in the treatment of asthma. Lung 159, 243–254 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02713922

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02713922

Key words

Search

Navigation