Skip to main content
Log in

European exports and outward foreign direct investment: A dynamic panel data approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

European Exports and Outward Foreign Direct Investment: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. — This paper implements a panel data approach for studying the determinants of and relationships between bilateral economic activities in terms of both trade and foreign direct investment between the EU member states. The familiar equation for testing the determinants of bilateral exports is reformulated to reflect recent theoretical work. It is specified as a dynamic panel data model designed to answer questions about their relationship according to changes in different exogenous determinants. Exports and stocks of outward FDI are found to be substitutes with respect to changes in transport costs and complements with respect to most of the other determinants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arellano, M., and S. Bond (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. (1994).Towards an Integrated Europe. London: CEPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. (1995).Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T., and B. Eichengreen (1995). Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion? Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and EFTA. NBER Working Paper 5283. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Bellak, C. (1996). International Capital Mobility — A Note.Journal of International Money and Finance 15 (5): 825–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and Factor Proportions Theory in International Trade.Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (1): 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1990). The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade.Economic Journal 100 (403): 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., and A. Kokko (1994). Home Country Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Sweden. NBER Working Paper 4639. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, L. S. (1993). A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with a Trade-off between Proximity and Concentration. NBER Working Paper 4269. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, L. S. (1997). An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Tradeoff between Multinational Sales and Trade.American Economic Review 87 (4): 520–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton P., F. DiMauro, and M. Lücke (1999). Economic Integration and FDI: An Empirical Analysis of Foreign Investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe.Empirica 26 (2): 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. L., J. R. Markusen, and K. E. Maskus (1998). Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise. NBER Working Paper 6773. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1996).Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, D. O. (1988). Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 124 (2): 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., and J. E. Stiglitz (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.American Economic Review 67 (3): 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1981).International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P., and M. Pfaffermayr (2000). Trade, Multinational Sales, and FDI in a Three-Factors Model. University of Linz Working Paper 0013. University of Linz.

  • Frank, R. H., and R. T. Freeman (1978).Distributional Consequences of Direct Foreign Investment. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraci, V. J., and W. Prewo (1976). Bilateral Trade Flows and Transport Costs.Review of Economics and Statistics 59 (1): 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman (1991).Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large Sample Properties of Generalized Methods of Moments Estimators.Econometrica 50 (4): 1029–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1984). A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations.Journal of Political Economy 92 (3): 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1987). Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries.Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1 (1): 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., and P. R. Krugman (1985).Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D., and J. Levinsohn (1995). Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence.Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 799–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, T., and K. J. Kopecky (1980). Foreign Direct Investment, Technology Transfer and Domestic Employment Effects.Journal of International Economics 10 (1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann, H. (1966).An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E., and M. Y. Weiss (1981). Foreign Production and Exports in Manufacturing Industries.Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (4): 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E., and M. Y. Weiss (1984). Foreign Production and Exports of Individual Firms.Review of Economics and Statistics 66 (2): 304–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1967). Optimal Investment Policy and the Flexible Accelerator.International Economic Review 8 (1): 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl, H. (1993).Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen J. R., and K. E. Maskus (1999a). Multinational Firms: Reconciling Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper 7163. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen J. R., and K. E. Maskus (1999b). Discriminating among Alternative Theories of the Multinational Enterprise. NBER Working Paper 7164. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R., and A. Venables (1998). Multinational Firms and the New Trade Theory.Journal of International Economics 46 (2): 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R., and A. Venables (2000). The Theory of Endowment, Intra-Industry, and Multinational Trade.Journal of International Economics 52 (2): 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín, C., and F. Velàzquez (1997). The Determining Factors of Foreign Direct Investment in Spain and the Rest of the OECD: Lessons for the CEECs. CEPR Discussion Paper 1637. CEPR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, C. (1995). Panel Data, Multinational Enterprises and Direct Investment. In L. Mátyás and P. Sevestre (ed.),The Econometrics of Panel Data. A Handbook of the Theory with Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mátyás, L. (1997). Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model.World Economy 20 (3): 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennel, A., and J. Foerster (1997).Steuern in Europa, Amerika und Asien. Berlin: Verlag Neue Wirtschafts-Briefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999).Measuring Globalization: The Role of Multinationals in OECD Economies. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oguledo, V. I., and C. R. MacPhee (1994). Gravity Models: A Reformulation and an Application to Discriminatory Trade Arrangements.Applied Economics 26 (2): 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffermayr, M. (1996). Foreign Outward Direct Investment and Exports in Austrian Manufacturing: Substitutes or Complements?Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132 (3): 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90 (1): 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargan, J. D. (1958). The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables.Econometrica 26 (2): 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevestre, P., and A. Trognon (1995). Dynamic Linear Models. In L. Mátyás and P. Sevestre (ed.),The Econometrics of Panel Data. A Handbook of the Theory with Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, R. (1996). Effects of Overseas Production on Home Country Exports: Evidence Based on Swedish Multinationals.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132 (2): 304–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedenborg, B. (1979).The Multinational Operations of Swedish Firms. An Analysis of Determinants and Effects. Stockholm: The Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1962).Shaping the World Economy. Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Egger, P. European exports and outward foreign direct investment: A dynamic panel data approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137, 427–449 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707625

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707625

C33

Navigation