Skip to main content
Log in

Recognition schemes for protein-nucleic acid interactions

  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The molecular forces involved in protein-nucleic acid interaction are electrostatic, stacking and hydrogen-bonding. These interactions have a certain amount of specificity due to the directional nature of such interactions and the spatial contributions of the steric effects of different substituent groups. Quantum chemical calculations on these interactions have been reported which clearly bring out such features.

While the binding energies for electrostatic interactions are an order of magnitude higher, the differences in interaction energies for structures stabilised by hydrogen-bonding and stacking are relatively small. Thus, the molecular interactions alone cannot explain the highly specific nature of binding observed in certain segments of proteins and nucleic acids. It is therefore logical to assume that the sequence dependent three dimensional structures of these molecules help to place the functional groups in the correct geometry for a favourable interaction between the two molecules.

We have carried out 2D-FT nuclear magnetic resonance studies on the oligonucleotide d-GGATCCGGATCC. This oligonucleotide sequence has two binding sites for the restriction enzyme Bam H1. Our studies indicate that the conformation of this DNA fragment is predominantly B-type except near the binding sites where the ribose ring prefers a3E conformation. This interesting finding raises the general question about the presence of specificity in the inherent backbone structures of proteins and nucleic acids as opposed to specific intermolecular interactions which may induce conformational changes to facilitate such binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnott, S. (1971)Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.,21, 265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, S. and Hukins, P. W. L. (1972)Biochem. J.,130, 453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aue, P., Bartholdi, E. and Ernst, R. R. (1976)J. Chem. Phys.,64, 2229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown (1970)Biochim. Biophys, Acta.,213, 282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruskov, V. I. (1975)Molek. Biol.,9, 304.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caillet, J. and Claverie, P. (1975)Acta. Crystalogr.,31A, 448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claverie, P. (1978) inIntermodular Interactions; From Diatomics to Biopolymers, (ed. B. Pullman) (New York: Wiley) p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, E. J., Dastefano, R. and Sanford, K. (1972)Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,46, 155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govil, G. and Hosur, R. V. (1982)Conformation of Biological Molecules, (New York: Springer Verlag).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hosur, R. V. (1980)Curr. Sci.,49, 928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosur, R. V., Kumar, N. V. and Govil, G. (1981)Int. J. Q. Chem.,20, 23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosur, R. V. and Pohorille, A., (1981)Int. J. Q. Chem.,20, 33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosur, R. V., Ravi Kumar, M., Roy, K. B., Tan, Zu-Kun, Miles, H. T. and Govil, G. (1985) inMagnetic Resonance in Biology and Medicine (eds G. Govil, C. L. Khetrapal and A. Saran) (New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helene, C. (1977)FEBS Lett.,74, 10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helene, C. and Lancelot, G. (1982)Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.,39, 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Wagner, G., Ernst, R. R. and Wuthrich, K. (1980)Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,96, 1156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. V. and Govil, G. (1982) inConformation in Biology, (eds R. Srinivasan and R. H. Sarma) (New York: Adenine Press) p. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. V. and Govil, G. (1984a)Biopolymers,23, 1979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. V. and Govil, G. (1984b)Biopolymer,23, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. V. and Govil, G. (1984c)Biopolymer 23, 2009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Fevre, R. J. W. (1965)Adv. Phys. Org. Chem.,3, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pople, J. A. and Beveridge, D. L. (1970)Approximate Molecular Orbital Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheek, R. M., Zuiderweg, E. R. P., Boelens, R., Van Gunsteress, W. F. and Kaptein, R. (1985) inMagnetic Resonance in Biology and Medicine (eds G. Govil, C. L. Khetrapal and A. Saran), (New Delhi: Tata McGrawHill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemann, N. C., Rosenberg, J. M. and Rich, A. (1976)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,73, 804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Govil, G., Kumar, N.Y., Ravi Kumar, M. et al. Recognition schemes for protein-nucleic acid interactions. J. Biosci. 8, 645–656 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702763

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702763

Keywords

Navigation