Abstract
Structure-property relationships of two HY-100 steel weldments prepared by submerged arc (SAW) and gas metal arc (GMAW) welding processes using identical heat input (2.2 kJ mm-1) have been studied. It has been found that submerged arc welded (SAW) HY-100 steel weldments have a lower weld toughness than welds produced by the gas metal arc welding (GMAW) process. Optical, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy were used in conjunction with microhardness traverses to characterize and compare the various microconstituents that are present in the last weld pass of both weldments. TEM examination revealed the presence of coarse upper bainite, B-II bainite, and carbides in a highly dislocated ferrite matrix as well as in ferrite laths in the SAW weldment, while the GMAW weldment exhibited a typical fine low carbon lath martensite, autotempered martensite, and mixed B-II and B-III bainites which occasionally contained small regions of twinned martensite. The measured cooling rate in the SAW was found to be about 40 pct slower than that in GMAW. It was also found in the SAW that the weld metal inclusion number density was about 25 pct greater than that in GMAW. Micro-hardness traverses exhibited significantly lower hardness (about 50 HV) in the SAW weldment compared with GMAW, but the tempered weld metal microhardness in both the weldments was measured about the same, at 250 HV. The ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT) of both weldments was determined by Charpy impact test. Based on an average energy criterion, the DBTT of the SAW weldment was 323 K (50 °C) higher than that of the GMAW weldment. This difference in fracture resistance is due to the different weld metal microstructures. The different microstructures most probably result from differences in cooling rate subsequent to welding; however, the SAW weld also has a higher inclusion number density which could promote a higher transformation temperature for the austenite.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Deb and K. D. Challenger:Metallography, 1984, vol. 17, pp. 253–272.
G.T.B. Kellock, A. R. Sollars, and E. Smith:J.I.S.I., 1971, vol. 44(12), pp. 969–74.
E. Smith and R. L. Apps: Cranfield Institute of Technology Report Mat. No. 2, 1970.
K. D. Challenger, R. B. Brucker, W. M. Elger, and M.J. Sorek:Welding Journal, 1984, vol. 63(8), pp. 254s-62s.
Current Welding Processes: American Welding Society, 1968, pp. 2-3.
R. W. Flax, R. E. Keith, and M. D. Randall: ASTM STP 494, 1971, pp. 1-25.
“Military Specification Steel Plate, Alloy, Structural, High Yield Strength HY-80 and HY-100,” Department of the Navy Military Specification MIL-S-16216J (Ships), 15 March 1972.
D. J. Abson, R. E. Dolby, and P. H. M. Hart: Welding Institute Members Report, 67/1978/M, 1978.
Y. Ito and M. Nakanishi:The Sumitomo Search, 1976, vol. 15(5), pp. 42–62.
R. E. Dolby: Welding Institute Members Report, 14/1976/M, 1976.
D. J. Abson and R. E. Dolby: Welding Institute Research Bulletin, 1978, vol. 19(7), pp. 202–07.
E. Levine and D. C. Hill:Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1453–63.
R. W. Hertzberg:Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineer-ing Materials, John Wiley and Sons, 2nd ed., 1976, pp. 393-99.
T. Kunitake, F. Terasaki, Y. Ohmori, and H. Obtani:J.I.S.I., 1972, vol. 45(6), pp. 647–53.
J. P. Naylor and P. R. Krahe:Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 1699–1701.
D. Rosenthal:Trans. ASME, 1946, vol. 68, pp. 849–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Formerly Adjunct Research Professor with the Materials Engineering Group, Naval Postgraduate School
Formerly Graduate Student at NPS
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deb, P., Challenger, K.D. & Therrien, A.E. Structure-property correlation of submerged-arc and gas-metal-arc weldments in HY-100 steel. Metall Trans A 18, 987–999 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02668547
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02668547