Summary
Patterns of somatic embryo development from callus were elucidated inIpomoea batatas Poir. (sweet potato). Embryos at three stages of development were able to grow into plants. They included embryos arrested at the late torpedo and cotyledonary stages, and an arrested torpedo embryo that resulted from precocious hypocotyl expansion. Early torpedo-stage embryos rooted on reculture but did not form shoots. A diversity of other embryo stages were also produced which upon reculture formed only adventitious embryos and roots. Morphologic variants with similar growth potential were noted among embryos at similar stages of development. Plasticity in somatic embryo developmental patterns led to different forms that were mature enough to produce plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammirato, P. V. Patterns of development in culture. In: Henke, R. R.; Hughes, K. W.; Constantin, et al. eds. Tissue culture in forestry and agriculture. New York: Plenum Press; 1985:9–29.
Ammirato, P. V.; Steward, F. C. Some effects of the environment on the development of embryos from cultured free cells. Bot. Gaz. 132:149–158; 1971.
Dos Santos, A. V. P.; Cutter, E. G.; Davey, M. R. Origin and development of somatic inMedicago sativa L. (Alfalfa). Protoplasma 117:107–115; 1983.
Gray, D. J.; Conger, B. V. Time-lapse light photomicrography and scanning electron microscopy of somatic embryo ontogeny from cultured leaves ofDactylis glomerata (Gramineae). Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 104:395–399; 1985.
Haccius, B. Question of unicellular origin of non-zygotic embryos in callus cultures. Phytomorphology 28:74–81; 1978.
Haccius, B.; Bhandari, N. N. Delayed histogen differentiation as a common primitive character in all types of non-zygotic embryos. Phytomorphology 25:91–94; 1975.
Halperin, W. Alternative morphogenetic events in cell suspensions. Am. J. Bot. 53:443–453; 1966.
Jarret, R. L.; Salazar, S.; Fernandez, Z. R. Somatic embryogenesis in sweet potato. HortScience 19:397–398; 1984.
Konar, R. N.; Thomas, E.; Street, H. E. The diversity of morphogenesis in suspension cultures ofAtropa belladonna L. Ann. Bot. 36:249–258; 1972.
Liu, J. R.; Cantliffe, D. J. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in tissue culture of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Poir.). Plant. Cell. Rep. 3:112–115; 1984.
Lutz, J. D.; Wong, J. R.; Rowe, J., et al. Somatic embryogenesis for mass cloning in crop plants. In: Henke, R. R.; Hughes, K. W.; Constantin, M. J., et al. eds. Tissue culture in forestry and agriculture. New York: Plenum Press; 1985:105–116.
Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised media for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497; 1962.
Pierson, P.; Koehler, S.; Wright, M. Histology of structures from a soybean (Glycine max) somatic embryogenesis protocol. In: Henke, R. R.; Hughes, K. W.; Constantin, M. J., et al., eds. Tissue culture in forestry and agriculture. New York: Plenum Press; 1985:341.
Stuart, D. A.; Nelsen, J.; Strickland, S. G., et al. Factors affecting developmental processes in alfalfa cell cultures. In: Henke, R. R.; Hughes, K. W.; Constantin, M. J., et al., eds. Tissue culture in forestry and agriculture. New York: Plenum Press; 1985:59–73.
Tsay, H.-S.; Tseng, M.-T. Embryoid formation and plantlet regeneration from anther callus of sweet potato. Bot. Bull. Academia Sinica 20:117–122; 1979.
Vasil, I. K.; Hildebrandt, A. C. Variations of morphogenetic behavior in plant tissue cultures II.Petrolinum hortense. Am. J. Bot. 53:869–874; 1966.
Vasil, V.; Vasil, I. K. The ontogeny of somatic embryos ofPenisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum. I. in cultured immature embryos. Bot. Gaz. 143:454–465; 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work has been funded in part by an IFAS/Gas Research Institute cooperative grant. Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 8789.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chée, R.P., Cantliffe, D.J. Somatic embryony patterns and plant regeneration inIpomoea batatas poir. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 24, 955–958 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02623910
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02623910