Skip to main content
Log in

Do previous acid reducing procedures protect patients from short bowel syndrome?—A case report

Eine vorherige Magensäure-reduzierende Operation verhindert das Kurzdarmsyndrom nach ausgedehnter Dünndarmresektion

  • The Interesting Case
  • Published:
Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

The resection of large segments of small intestine can cause short bowel syndrome.

Methods

A patient is described who underwent extensive bowel resection 15 years after vagotomy and antrectomy for peptic ulcer disease.

Results p The patient did not develop short bowel syndrome.

Conclusions

Acid reducing operations might have their place amongst other surgical procedures which have been proposed for treating refractory short bowel syndrome.

Zusammenfassung

Grundlagen

Nach Resektion großer Teile des Dünndarms entwickelt sich das Kurzdarmsyndrom.

Methodik p Ein Patient mit ausgedehnter Dünndarmresektion 25 Jahre nach Vagotomie und Antrektomie wegen Ulcus pepticum, wird beschrieben.

Ergebnisse

Der Patient entwickelte kein Kurzdarmsyndrom.

Schlu\folgerungen

Säurereduzierende Operationen haben neben anderen chirurgischen Maßnahmen ihren Stellenwert zur wirkungsvollen Beeinflussung des Kurzdarmsyndroms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson JS: Surgical considerations in the short bowel syndrome. Surg Gynec Obstet 1993;176:89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Albo RJ, Angotti D, Sorensen D: Value of selective and truncal vagotomy in massive bowel resection. Am J Surg 1974;128:234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burrington JD: Surgery after massive bowel resection. Am J Surg 1971;121:213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson JS, Harty RJ, Saigh JA: Morphological and nutritional responses to intestinal patching following intestinal resection. Surgery 1988;103:79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolff SA, Telander RL, Go VLW, et al: Effect of proximal gastre vagotomy and truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty on gastric functions and growth in puppies after massive small bowel resection. J Pediatr Surg 1979;14:441.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craig TV, Stewart WR: Massive bowel resection in a patient with a 75 percent gastrectomy. Surgery 1960;48:678.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shelton EL Jr, Blaine MD: Massive small bowel resection in postgastrectomy patients: report of two cases. Tex Med 1954;59:96.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Townsend CM Jr, Thompson JC: Small intestine, in Schwartz SI (ed): Principles of Surgery, Vol 1. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989, pp 1216.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clayton BE, Cotton DA: A study of malabsorption after resection of the entire jejunum and the proximal half of the ileum. Gut 1961;2:18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Opie LH, Hunt BG, Finlay JM: Massive small bowel resection with malabsorption and negative magnesium balance. Gastroenterology 1964;47:415.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brolin RE: Colon interposition for extreme short bowel syndrome: A case report. Surgery 1986;100:576.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calik, A., Kucuktulu, U., Bilgin, Y. et al. Do previous acid reducing procedures protect patients from short bowel syndrome?—A case report. Acta Chir Austriaca 27, 223–225 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616531

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616531

Schlüsselwörter

Key-words

Navigation