Skip to main content
Log in

In Vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened vena tech-LGM vena caval filters

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been shown recently that Vena Tech-LGM (B. Braun Vena Tech, Evanston, IL) filters inserted into the inferior vena cava via the jugular route may be deployed sometimes in an incompletely opened (IO) position. The flow characteristics and clot capturing ability of IO Vena Tech-LGM filters are not clearly understood. Using a vena cava flow phantom, the clot-capturing abilities of the IO and opened Vena Tech-LGM, filters were assessed. For 5 × 5-mm clots, the IO Vena Tech-LGM filter captured only 40% of thrombi compared with a 90% capture rate for the opened filter. The capture rates were 90 and 100% for the IO and opened filter, respectively, for larger 5 × 15-mm clots. It was found that the IO filter could capture 2–7 × 25 mm thrombi prior to the development of a turbulent bypass channel which prevented subsequent clot capture. Using 5 × 15 mm clots, this same phenomenon occurred with the capture of 6 and 11 thrombi by the IO and opened Vena Tech-LGM filters, respectively. Our results suggest a significantly reduced filtering efficiency for the IO Vena Tech-LGM device. However, there is a high rate of clot capture with the opened Vena Tech-LGM filter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reed RA, Teitelbaum GP, Taylor RC, Vogelzang RC, Yedlicka JW, Pentecost MJ, Castenada-Zuniga W, Amplatz K (1991) Incomplete opening of LGM filters inserted via the transjugular approach. JVIR 2:441–447

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor FC, Watkins GE (1992) In vitro simulations of incomplete opening of the LGM/Vena-Tech filter using the original and the newly modified filter design (abstract). JVIR 3:40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katsamouris AA, Waltman AC, Delichatsios MA, Athanasoulis CA (1988) Inferior vena cava filters: In vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics. Radiology 166:361–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hung TC, Hochmuth RM, Joist HJ, Sutera SP (1976) Shear-induced aggregation and lysis of platelets. Trans Am Soc Artif Internal Organs 22:285–291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein PO, Sabbah HN (1974) Measured turbulence and its effect on thrombus formation. Circ Res 35:608–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith RL, Blick EF, Coalson F, Stein P (1972) Thrombus production by turbulence. J. Appl. Physiol 32:261–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Korbin CD, Reed RA, Teitelbaum GP, Pentecost MJ (1991) In vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of the Bird Nest's filter in oversized inferior venae cavae versus biiliac filters (abstract). JVIR 2:16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korbin, C.D., Reed, R.A., Taylor, F.C. et al. In Vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened vena tech-LGM vena caval filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16, 3–6 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603028

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603028

Key words

Navigation