Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To appraise women’s perceived risk of developing breast cancer and the effects of a physician’s educational intervention on this perception.
DESIGN: Longitudinal before-and-after study involving four measures of participants’ risk of developing breast cancer. Eligible women provided the data needed to calculate an objective estimate of their individual risk of developing breast cancer before age 80 using the Gail formula. They also provided a subjective estimate of their individual perceived risk. Then, each participant met with a general internal medicine physician who provided personalized information and education. Immediately after education, and again several months later, we reassessed each woman’s perceived risk.
SETTING: Physician’s office.
PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 59 women participating in the Tamoxifen Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Twenty-nine women returned for the follow-up risk assessment.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median calculated risk of breast cancer before age 80 (by the Gail formula) was 15%, but the median perceived risk before educational intervention was 50%. The perceived risk after educational intervention fell to 25%. At late follow-up, the median perceived risk remained at 25%. The difference between the pre-educational perceptions and the calculated estimates was significant (p<.0001). After educational intervention, perceived risk measures shifted closer to the calculated value, but still remained significantly higher (p<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Women often substantially overestimate their chances of getting breast cancer. Educational intervention by a physician, including explanation of an individual’s calculated risk, can reduce this error. The effect of education appears to persist at least for several months.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fisher B. NSABP Protocol P-l. A clinical trial to determine the worth of Tamoxifen for preventing breast cancer. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA. January 24, 1992.
Black WC, Nease RF Jr. Tosteson ANA. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:720–6.
Evans DGR, Burnell LD, Hopwood P, Howell A. Perception of risk in women with a family history or breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:612–4.
Stefanek M. Counseling women at high risk for breast cancer. Oncology. 1990;4:27–33.
Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B, et al. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:286–92.
Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:1074–80.
Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1879–86.
Sumner W, Nease R, Littenberg B. U-Titer: a utility assessment tool. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: McGraw-Hill, 1991;701–5.
Gail MH, Benichou J. Validation studies on a model for breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:573–5.
Siegel S. Non-parametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Lerman C, Sands CB, Balshem A. Breast cancer risk factors are underestimated among high risk women, [abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993;27:177.
Bondy ML, Lustbader ED, Halabi S, Ross E, Vogel VG. Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:620–5.
Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Hunter D, Hertzmark E. Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:600–7.
Schwartz S. Medical Thinking: The Psychology of Medical Judgment and Decision Making. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
Mazur DJ, Merz JF. How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients’ interpretations of verbal probability terms. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:268–71.
Littenberg B, Nease RF. When numbers get serious. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:295–6.
Tape TG, Krlpal J, Wigton RS. Comparing methods of learning clinical prediction from case simulations. Med Decis Making. 1992;12:213–21.
Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Quadrel MJ. Risk perception and communication. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:183–203.
Tversky A, Kahenman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.
Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the international workshop on screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer fast. 1993;85:1644–56.
Polednak AP, Lane DS, Burg MA. Risk perception, family history, and use of breast cancer screening tests. Cancer Detect Prev. 1991;15:258–63.
Hailey BJ. Family history of breast cancer and screening behaviors: an inverted U-shaped curve? Med Hypotheses. 1991;36:397–402.
Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, Miller DG. Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:24–30.
Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:843–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Reprints are not available.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alexander, N.E., Ross, J., Sumner, W. et al. The effect of an educational intervention on the perceived risk of breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med 11, 92–97 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599584
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599584