Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare nurse practitioner (NP) and physician rates of breast and cervical cancer screening among poor, elderly black women.

Design: A quasi-experimental design was used to compare pre- and postintervention annual screening rates. Rates were determined by medical record audits.

Setting: Two urban public hospital primary care clinics served as the study sites.

Patients: All women aged 65 years or more were eligible to participate.

Interventions: Women were offered screening by a NP during a routine visit in the intervention site; a physician reminder system was used in the control site.

Main results: Baseline annual screening rates were comparable in the two study sites. At the end of the study period, rates were significantly higher in the NP site, compared with the control. In the NP clinic, the annual rate of Pap tests increased to 56.9% from the baseline of 17.8%, and mammographies increased to 40% from 18.3%. In comparison, rates remained low in the control site, increasing only to 18.2% of women receiving Pap tests from a baseline of 11.8%, and remaining at 18% for mammography.

Conclusions: Use of a NP to deliver same-day screening is an effective strategy to target poor, elderly black women for breast and cervical cancer screening. However, even with the substantial increases in rates obtained with the NP intervention, screening in this vulnerable population remains below nationally targeted levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silverberg E, Boring CC, Squires TS. Cancer statistics 1990. CA Cancer Clin. 1990;40:9–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer statistics review 1973–1987. SEER Program. Bethesda, MD: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, PHS, NIH, NCI. NIH Public No 90-2789, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mortality, volume 2. In: Vital statistics of the United States, 1976. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1976, part A.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman HP, Wasfie TJ. Cancer of the breast in poor black women. Cancer. 1989;63:2562–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Axtell LM, Myers M. Contrasts in survival of black and white cancer patients, 1960–1973. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1978;60:1209–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bassett T, Krieger N. Social class and black—white differences in breast cancer survival. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1400–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dayal HH, Power RN, Chiu C. Race and social-economic status in survival from breast cancer. J Chron Dis. 1970;23:105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. American Cancer Society. Cancer in the economically disadvantaged. New York: Subcommittee on Cancer in the Economically Disadvantaged, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes FF, Hearne E. Cancer stage-to-age relationship: implications for cancer screening in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1981;29:55–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandelblatt J, Andrews H, Kerner J, Zauber A, Burnett W. Determinants of late stage diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer: the impact of age, race, social class, and hospital type. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:646–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodwin JS, Samet JM, Key CR, Humble C, Kutvirt D, Hunt C. Stage at diagnosis of cancer varies with the age of the patient. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:20–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Special Report. Access to health care in the United States: results of a 1986 survey. Number 2:1987;1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Cancer Society. 1986 survey of public awareness and use of cancer detection tests. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization, April 1986;1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Makuc DM, Fried VM, Kleinman JC. National trends in the use of preventive health care by women. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:21–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lieberman Research Inc. A study of women’s awareness and use of mammograms. New York: Leiberman Research, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Consortium. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? The results of the NCI breast cancer screening consortium and national health interview survey studies. JAMA. 1990;264:54–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, Rodnick JE, Osborn EH. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1991;266:538–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Fordham D. Promoting cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1866–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nattinger AB, Panzer RJ, Janus J. Improving the utilization of screening mammography in primary care practices. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2087–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance. Med Care. 1986;24:659–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolosin RJ. Effect of appointment scheduling and reminder postcards on adherence to mammography recommendations. J Fam Pract. 1990;30:542–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ornstein SM, Garr DR, Jenkins RG, Rust PF, Arnon A. Computergenerated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1991;32:82–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fox SA, Tsou CV, Klos DS. An intervention to increase mammography screening by residents in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1985;20:467–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, revised ed. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, second edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981;13–8, 212–21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume 1—The analysis of case-control studies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980;69–73, 131–4, vol 2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Greenwald P, Sondik E. Cancer control objectives for the nation: 1985–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, monograph 2, 1986;2:27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fletcher SW. The periodic health examination and internal medicine: 1984. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:866–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fruchter RG, Boyce J, Hunt M. Missed opportunities for the early diagnosis of cancer of the cervix. Am J Public Health. 1980;70:418–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McPhee D, Richard R, Solkowitz S. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:275–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Battista R. Adult cancer prevention in primary care. Am J Public Health. 1983;73:1036–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. American Cancer Society. Survey of physicians’ attitudes and practices in cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin. 1985;35:197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Battista RN, Williams JI, MacFarlane LA. Determinants of primary medical practice in adult cancer prevention. Med Care. 1986;24:216–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Arnold RM, Martin SC, Parker RM. Taking care of patients: does it matter whether the physician is a woman? West J Med. 1988;149:729–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hall JA, Palmer RH, Orav EJ, et al. Performance quality, gender, and professional role: a study of physicians and non-physicians in 16 ambulatory care practices. Med Care. 1990;28:489–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Maheux B, Dufort F, Beland F, et al. Female medical practitioners: more preventive and patient oriented? Med Care. 1990;28:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Osborn EH, Bird JA, McPhee SJ, Rodnick JE, Fordham D. Cancer screening by primary care physicians. Can we explain the differences? J Fam Pract. 1991;32:465–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Canadian Task Force. Cervical cancer screening programs (Walton report). Can Med Assoc J. 1976;114:1003–33.

    Google Scholar 

  41. American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the cancer-related check-up: recommendations and rationale. CA Cancer J Clin. 1980;30:194–240.

    Google Scholar 

  42. National Institute of Health Consensus Development Panel. Cervical cancer screening: the Pap smear. South Med J. 1981;74:87–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. National Institutes of Health. Press release. Bethesda, MD: NIH, Jan 19, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fink DJ. Change in American Cancer Society checkup guidelines for detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1988;38:127–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Med Assoc J. 1991;145:1301–25.

    Google Scholar 

  46. U.S. Preventive Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mandelblatt JS. Papanicolaou testing after hysterectomy. JAMA. 1991;266:1239.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mandelblatt J, Gopaul I, Wistreich M. Gynecological care of elderly women. Another look at Papanicolaou smear testing. JAMA. 1986;256:367–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mandelblatt JS, Wheat ME, Monane M, Moshief R, Hollenberg J. Breast cancer screening for elderly women with and without co-morbid conditions: a decision model. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:722–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vital statistics of the United States, 1981. Volume II—Mortality, A. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Weinberger M, Saunders AF, Samsa GP, et al. Breast cancer screening in older women: practices and barriers reported by primary care physicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:22–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Burack RC, Liang J. The early detection of cancer in the primarycare setting. Prev Med. 1987;16:739–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Black JS, Kapoor W. Health promotion and disease prevention in older people. Our current state of ignorance. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:168–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gemson DH, Elinson J, Messeri P. Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients. J Community Health. 1988;13:53–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Belcher DW, Inui TS, Carter WB. Disease prevention program trial for VA outpatients. Arlington, VA: presented at the 11th annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, April 27–29, 1988.

  57. Stromborg M. Early detection of cancer in the elderly. Int J Nurs Stud. 1982;19(3):139–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Davidson RA, Fletcher SW, Retchin S, Duh S. A nurse-initiated reminder system for the periodic health examination. Implementation and evaluation. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:2167–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. O’Rourke N, Hamilton PA. Gynecological exams, a must for older women. Am J Nurs. 1979;79:2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ansell D, Dillard J, Rothenberg M, et al. Breast cancer screening in an urban black population. Cancer 1988;62:425–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Mandelblatt J, Fahs M. The cost—effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for low-income elderly women. JAMA. 1988;259:2409–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan—Kettering Cancer Center, USA

    Jeanne Mandelblatt MD, MPH & Peter Kanetsky MPH

  2. the Departments of Medicine, Harlem Hospital Center, New York, New York

    Maryann Traxler MD

  3. Nursing, Harlem Hospital Center, New York, New York

    Patricia Lakin NP

  4. Pathology, Harlem Hospital Center, New York, New York

    Louys Thomas MD & Prem Chauhan MD

  5. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harlem Hospital Center, New York, New York

    Stephen Matseoane MD

Authors
  1. Jeanne Mandelblatt MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maryann Traxler MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia Lakin NP
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Louys Thomas MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Prem Chauhan MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stephen Matseoane MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peter Kanetsky MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the Harlem Study Team

Additional information

Supported in part by National Institute on Aging Academic Award #KO8 AG00471, and National Cancer Institute Grant #RO3 CA51614-01 (Dr. Mandelblatt).

Members of the Harlem Study Team at Harlem Hospital Center included Evangelyn Ramsey, NP, Sook McGrath, NP, Lillian Jeremiah, NP, Charlena Pace, NP, Janice Dye, RN, and Regina Dunlap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mandelblatt, J., Traxler, M., Lakin, P. et al. A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women. J Gen Intern Med 8, 173–178 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599260

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599260

Key words

Search

Navigation