Skip to main content
Log in

Integration and backfitting methods in additive models-finite sample properties and comparison

  • Published:
Test Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine and compare the finite sample performance of the competing back-fitting and integration methods for estimating additive nonparametric regression using simulated data. Although, the asymptotic properties of the integration estimator, and to some extent the backfitting, method too, are well understood, its small sample properties are not well investigated. Apart from some small experiments in the above cited papers, there is little hard evidence concerning the exact distribution of the estimates. It is our purpose to provide an extensive finite sample comparison between the backfitting procedure and the integration procedure using simulated data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breiman, L. and J.H. Friedman (1985). Estimating optimal transformations for multiple regression and correlation (with discussion).Journal of the American Statistical Association,80, 580–619.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buja, A., T. Hastic and R. Tibshirani (1989). Lincar smoothers and additive models (with discussion).The Annals of Statistics,17, 453–555.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer (1980).Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge University, Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W., and P. Hall (1993). On the backfitting algorithm for additive regression models.Statistica Neederlandica,47, 43–57.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W., and O.B. Linton (1994). Applied nonparametric methods,The Handbook of Econometrics vol. IV, ch. 38 (R.F. Engle and D.F. McFadden, eds.) Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastic, T. and R. Tibshirani (1990).Generalized Additive Models, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibragimov, I.A. and R.Z. Hasminskii (1980). On nonparametric estimation of regression,Soviet Math. Dokl.,21, 810–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, O.B. (1997). Efficient estimation of additive nonparamteric regression models.Biometrika,84, 469–473.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, O.B., R. Chen, N. Wang, and W. Härdle (1995). An analysis of transformation for additive nonparametric regression.Journal of the American Statistical Association,92, 1512–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, O.B. and W. Härdle, (1996). Estimation of additive regression models with known links.Biometrika,83, 529–540.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, O.B., E. Mammen and J. Nielson (1998). The Existence and Asymptotic Properties of a Backfitting Projection Algorithm under weak conditions. Manuscript, Yale University.

  • Linton, O.B. and J.P. Nielsen (1995). A kernel method of cstimating structured nonparametric regression based on marginal integration.Biometrika,82, 93–100.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Masry, E. and D. Tjøstheim (1995). Nonparametric estimation and identification of nonlinear ARCH time series: strong convergence and asymptotic normality.Econometric Theory,11, 258–289.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Masry, E. and D. Tjøstheim, (1997). Additive nonlinear ARX time series and projection estimates.Econometric Theory,13, 214–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W.K. (1990). Semiparametric efficiency bounds.Journal of Applied Econometrics,5, 99–135.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W.K. (1994). Kernel estimation of partial means.Econometric Theory,10, 233–253.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J.P. (1996). Multiplicative and additive marker dependent hazard estimation based on marginal integration. Manuscript, PFA Pension.

  • Nielsen, J.P. and O.B. Linton (1997). An optimization interpretation of integration and backfitting estimators for separable nonparametric models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,60, 217–222.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Opsomer, J.D. and D. Ruppert (1997). Fitting a bivariate additive model by local polynomial regression.The Annals of Statistics,25, 212–243.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. (1996). Essays in Semiparametric Econometrics.PhD Thesis, MIT.

  • Powell, J.L. (1994). Estimation in semiparametric models.The Handbook of Econometrics, vol. IV, ch. 41 (R.F. Engle and D.F. McFadden, eds.) Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert, D. and M.P. Wand (1995). Multivariate Locally Weighted Least Squares.The Annals of Statistics,22, 1346–1370.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Severance-Lossin, E. and S. Sperlich (1997). Estimation of Derivatives for Additive Separable Models.Discussion Paper, SFB 373, Humboldt-University Berlin, Germany.

  • Stone, C.J. (1980). Optimal rates of convergence for nonparametric estimators.The Annals of Statistics,8, 1348–1360.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C.J. (1982). Optimal global rates of convergence for nonparametric regression.The Annals of Statistics,8, 1040–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C.J. (1985). Additive regression and other nonparametric models.The Annals of Statistics,13, 685–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C.J. (1986). The dimensionality reduction principle for generalized additive models.The Annals of Statistics,14, 592–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjøstheim, D. and B. Auestad (1994). Nonparametric identification of nonlinear time series: projections.Journal of the American Statistical Association,89, 1398–1409.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Venables, W.N. and B. Ripley (1994).Modern applied statistics with S-Plus. Springer Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wand, M.P. and M.C. Jones (1995).Kernel Smoothing. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 60. Chapman and Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, NATO, and Deutsche Forschungsmemeinschaft, SFB 373.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sperlich, S., Linton, O.B. & Härdle, W. Integration and backfitting methods in additive models-finite sample properties and comparison. Test 8, 419–458 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595879

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595879

Key words

AMS subject classification

Navigation