Skip to main content
Log in

Regenerating hyaline cartilage in articular defects of old chickens using implants of embryonal chick chondrocytes embedded in a new natural delivery substance

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Partial and full thickness defects were created mechanically in articular cartilage and subchondral bone of the tibiotarsal joint condyles of 3-year-old chickens. The wounds were then repaired using embryonal chick chondrocytes embedded in a new biocompatible, hyaluronic acid-based delivery substance. Controls were similarly operated on but received either no treatment or implants of the delivery substance only. Animals were killed from 1 week to 6 months postoperatively. Sections from the two groups were examined and compared macroscopically, histologically, and histochemically. Results of 6-month follow-up showed that only the defects of the experimental chickens were completely filled with reparative hyaline cartilage tissue, with no signs of inflammation or immunologic rejection. Initially the entire defect cavity, whether partial thickness or full thickness up to the deep regions in the subchondral bone, was filled with cartilaginous reparative tissue. Relatively rapid maturation occurred under the tidemark; chondrocytes hypertrophied, were invaded with vascular elements and ossified. In the superficial areas, the reparative tissue remained cartilaginous and matured as typical hyaline cartilage tissue. These results indicate that aged chicken cartilage and its accompanying thin and spongy osteoporotic bone offer a favorable host environment for embryonal cell implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell CJ (1969) The healing of cartilage defects. Clin Orthop 64:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghadially FN (1983) Fine structure of synovial joints. Butterworths, London, pp 261–307

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell N, Shepard N (1976) The resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilage by multiple perforations through the subchondral bone. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:230–233

    Google Scholar 

  4. Furukawa T, Eyre DR, Koide S, Glimcher MJ (1980) Biochemical studies on repair cartilage resurfacing experimental defects in the rabbit knee. J Bone Joint Surg 62A:79–89

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bentley G, Greci RB (1971) Homotransplantation of isolated epiphyseal and articular cartilage chondrocytes into joint surfaces of rabbits. Nature 230:385–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentley G, Smith AV, Mukerjhee R (1978) Isolated epiphyseal chondrocyte allograft into joint surface—an experimental study in rabbits. Ann Rheum Dis 37:449–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aston JE, Bentley G (1986) Repair of articular surfaces by allografts of articular and growth plate cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 68B:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  8. Itay S, Abramovici A, Nevo Z (1987) Use of cultured embryonal chick epiphyseal chondrocytes as grafts for defects in chick articular cartilage. Clin Orthop 220:284–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dustman HO, Puhl W (1976) Alterabhangige Heilungsmoglichkeiten von Knorpelwunden. Z Orthop 114:749–764

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vignon E, Arlot M, Patricot LM, Vignon G (1976) The cell density of human femoral head cartilage. Clin Orthop 121:303–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engkvist O (1979) Reconstruction of patellar articular cartilage with free autologous perichondral grafts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 13:361–369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kon M (1981) Cartilage formation from perichondrium in a weight-bearing joint. Eur Surg Res 13:387–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Driscoll SW, Salter RB (1986) The induction of neochondrogenesis in free intra-articular periosteal autografts under the influence of continuous passive motion. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:1248–1257

    Google Scholar 

  14. O'Driscoll SW, Salter RB (1986) The repair of major osteochondral defects in joint surfaces by neochondrogenesis with autogenous osteoperiosteal grafts stimulated by continuous passive motion. Clin Orthop 208:131–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubak JM (1982) Reconstruction of articular cartilage defects with free periosteal grafts. Acta Orthop Scand 53:175–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elves MW (1974) A study of the transplantation antigens on chondrocytes from articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 56B:178–185

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heyner S (1969) The significance of the intercellular matrix in the survival of cartilage allografts. Transplantation 8:666–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Plenk H, Passi R (1981) Trans-and replantation of articular cartilage using the fibrinogen adhesive system. In: Gastpar H (ed) Biology of the articular cartilage in health and disease. Proceedings of the 2nd Munich Symposium on Biology of Connective Tissue. Schattauer, Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, D., Halperin, N. & Nevo, Z. Regenerating hyaline cartilage in articular defects of old chickens using implants of embryonal chick chondrocytes embedded in a new natural delivery substance. Calcif Tissue Int 46, 246–253 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555003

Key words

Navigation